IFN-I and IFN-III immunity in the nasal mucosa is poorly characterized during SARS-CoV-2 infection. We analyze the nasal IFN-I/III signature, namely the expression of ISGF-3–dependent IFN-stimulated genes, in mildly symptomatic COVID-19 patients and show its correlation with serum IFN-α2 levels, which peak at symptom onset and return to baseline from day 10 onward. Moreover, the nasal IFN-I/III signature correlates with the nasopharyngeal viral load and is associated with the presence of infectious viruses. By contrast, we observe low nasal IFN-I/III scores despite high nasal viral loads in a subset of critically ill COVID-19 patients, which correlates with the presence of autoantibodies (auto-Abs) against IFN-I in both blood and nasopharyngeal mucosa. In addition, functional assays in a reconstituted human airway epithelium model of SARS-CoV-2 infection confirm the role of such auto-Abs in abrogating the antiviral effects of IFN-I, but not those of IFN-III. Thus, IFN-I auto-Abs may compromise not only systemic but also local antiviral IFN-I immunity at the early stages of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Torque teno virus (TTV) has been proposed as a surrogate biomarker of T-cell function in allogeneic–haematopoietic–stem-cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Conflicting data exists regarding the value of TTV to assess the degree of immunosuppression. The aim of the present study was to investigate the correlation between TTV viral load and immune function. Using samples from a prospective cohort composed of healthy-volunteers (HV) and allo-HSCT recipients at 6 months post-transplantation, we assessed the correlation between TTV viraemia and immune cell counts or T-cell proliferation capacity post-phytohaemagglutinin stimulation. TTV viraemia was detected in 68% of HV (n = 80) and 100% of allo-HSCT recipients (n = 41; p < 0.001); it was significantly higher in allo-HSCT recipients (3.9 vs. 2.1 Log copies/mL, p < 0.001). There was no correlation between T-cell function and CD3⁺T-cell count (rho: 0.002) suggesting that T-cell count can normalise without full functional recovery. Furthermore, no significant correlation was observed between TTV viraemia and absolute total/subset lymphocyte counts (rho: <0.13). The highest correlation was observed between TTV viral load and T-cell proliferation capacity (rho: −0.39). We therefore report an inverse correlation between T-cell function and TTV viraemia that is independent of T-cell count. Monitoring of TTV viraemia could be a fast suitable option to objectively assess the competence of immune function in at-risk populations.

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved

Immune reconstitution (IR) following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is currently monitored by measuring the absolute number of immune effectors. However, this approach does not capture functional immune capacities. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the temporal evolution of functional IR alongside traditional immune cell counts measurements. Whole-blood stimulation with TruCulture® tubes containing lipopolysaccharides or Staphylococcal enterotoxin B was performed on 55 allo-HSCT recipients at 6- and 12-months post-transplant, and on 10 healthy volunteers. The expression of 144 immune-related genes was quantified using NanoString® technology. The temporal follow-up of functional immune profiles was analyzed over time according to demographic, clinical characteristics, and immune cell counts. The evaluation of IR in allo-HSCT recipients up to 12-months post-transplant showed a significant discrepancy between quantitative and qualitative assessments. While immune cell counts improved, e.g. the proportion of recipients reaching normal CD4⁺ T-cell values, increasing from 25% to 46%, transcriptomic profiles showed persistent functional alterations. More than 78% of less-induced genes observed at 6-months still exhibited a reduced expression at 12-months post-transplant. Transcriptomic immune profiling divulged diverse functional outcomes linked to clinical characteristics, which were not reflected by cell count assessments alone. Herein, we emphasize that quantitative assessment of immune effectors alone is not informative enough to classify allo-HSCT recipients regarding functional immune capacity. Our findings highlight the value of implementing IFA as an additional tool for a comprehensive understanding of functional IR post-allo-HSCT, which could serve as a straightforward and efficient method for enabling personalized post-transplant management.

Recent advances in the immunotherapy field require evaluation of the immune function to adapt therapeutic decisions. Immune functional assays (IFA) are able to reveal the immune status and would be useful to further adapt and/or improve patient's care. However, standardized methods are needed to implement IFA in clinical settings. We carried out an independent validation of a published method used to characterize the underlying host response to infectious conditions using an IFA. We evaluated the reproducibility and robustness of this IFA and the associated readout using an independent healthy volunteers (HV) cohort. Expression of a 44-gene signature and IFNγ protein secretion was assessed after stimulation. We observed a strong host-response correlation between the two cohorts. We also highlight that standardized methods for immune function evaluation exist and could be implemented in larger-scale studies. This IFA could be a relevant tool to reveal innate and adaptive immune dysfunction in immune-related disorders patients.

Immune reconstitution after allogeneic-hematopoietic-stem-cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is a complex and individual process. In this cross-sectional study, whole-blood (WB) immune functional assay (IFA) was used to characterize immune function by assessing immune-related gene/pathway alterations. The usefulness of this tool in the context of infection, 6 months after transplantation, was evaluated. Sixty allo-HSCT recipients at 6 months after transplantation and 10 healthy volunteers (HV) were included. WB was stimulated in standardized TruCulture tubes using lipopolysaccharides and Staphylococcal enterotoxin B. Gene expression was quantified using a custom 144-gene panel using NanoString nCounter technology and analyzed using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. The relationships between immune function and clinical characteristics, immune cell counts, and post-transplantation infections were assessed. Allo-HSCT recipients were able to activate similar networks of the innate and adaptive immune response compared to HV, with, nevertheless, a lower intensity. A reduced number and a lower expression of genes associated with immunoregulatory and inflammatory processes were observed in allo-HSCT recipients. The use of immunosuppressive treatments was associated with a protracted immune reconstitution revealed by transcriptomic immunoprofiling. No difference in immune cell counts was observed among patients receiving or not receiving immunosuppressive treatments using a large immunophenotyping panel. Moreover, the expression of a set of genes, including CCL3/CCL4, was significantly lower in patients with Herpesviridae reactivation (32%, 19/60), which once again was not identified using classical immune cell counts. Transcriptional IFA revealed the heterogeneity among allo-HSCT recipients with a reduced immune function, a result that could not be captured by circulating immune cell counts. This highlights the potential added value of this tool for the personalized care of immunocompromised patients.