Eric Ford

Dr. Eric Ford

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2006 in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EFEric Ford
Eric Ford
NMNir Menachemi
Nir Menachemi
MPMsha M. Thad Phillips
Msha M. Thad Phillips
Objectives: The purpose of this study was threefold. First, we gathered and synthesized the historic literature regarding electronic health record (E

7 July 2021 in Science Translational Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HKHeather Kalish
Heather Kalish
CKCarleen Klumpp-Thomas
Carleen Klumpp-Thomas
SHSally Hunsberger
Sally Hunsberger
HBHolly Ann Baus
Holly Ann Baus
MFMichael P. Fay
Michael P. Fay
KSKaitlyn Sadtler
Kaitlyn Sadtler
Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection and delayed implementation of diagnostics have led to poorly defined viral prevalence rates in the United States and elsewhere. To address this, we analyzed seropositivity in 9089 adults in the United States who had not been diagnosed previously with COVID-19. Individuals with characteristics that reflected the U.S. population (n = 27,716) were selected by quota sampling from 462,949 volunteers. Enrolled participants (n = 11,382) provided medical, geographic, demographic, and socioeconomic information and dried blood samples. Survey questions coincident with the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System survey, a large probability-based national survey, were used to adjust for selection bias. Most blood samples (88.7%) were collected between 10 May and 31 July 2020 and were processed using ELISA to measure seropositivity (IgG and IgM antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and the spike protein receptor binding domain). The overall weighted undiagnosed seropositivity estimate was 4.6% (95% CI, 2.6 to 6.5%), with race, age, sex, ethnicity, and urban/rural subgroup estimates ranging from 1.1% to 14.2%. The highest seropositivity estimates were in African American participants; younger, female, and Hispanic participants; and residents of urban centers. These data indicate that there were 4.8 undiagnosed SARS-CoV-2 infections for every diagnosed case of COVID-19, and an estimated 16.8 million infections were undiagnosed by mid-July 2020 in the United States.

1 May 2009 in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EFEric Ford
Eric Ford
NMNir Menachemi
Nir Menachemi
LPLori T. Peterson
Lori T. Peterson
THT. R. Huerta
T. R. Huerta
Objective: The purpose of this study is to reassess the projected rate of Electronic Health Record (EHR) diffusion and examine how the federal govern

30 March 2016 in Journal of Medical Internet Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
EFEric Ford
Eric Ford
BHBradford W Hesse
Bradford W Hesse
THTimothy R Huerta
Timothy R Huerta
Journal of Medical Internet Research - International Scientific Journal for Medical Research, Information and Communication on the Internet

1 May 2004 in Journal of Applied Social Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KZKelly L. Zellars
Kelly L. Zellars
WHWayne A. Hochwarter
Wayne A. Hochwarter
PPPamela L. Perrewé
Pamela L. Perrewé
NHNicole Hoffman
Nicole Hoffman
EFEric Ford
Eric Ford

7 August 2018 in Journal of Medical Internet Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
HKHadi Kharrazi
Hadi Kharrazi
CGClaudia P Gonzalez
Claudia P Gonzalez
KLKevin B Lowe
Kevin B Lowe
THTimothy R Huerta
Timothy R Huerta
EFEric Ford
Eric Ford
Journal of Medical Internet Research - International Scientific Journal for Medical Research, Information and Communication on the Internet #Preprint #PeerReviewMe: Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint. Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn. Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period. Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author). Background: The Meaningful Use (MU) program has promoted the EHR adoption among U.S. hospitals. Studies have shown that EHR adoption has been slower than desired in certain types of hospitals; but generally, the overall adoption rate has increased among hospitals. However, these studies have neither evaluated the adoption of advanced functionalities of EHRs (beyond MU) nor forecasted EHR maturation over an extended period in holistic fashion. Additional research is needed to assess U.S. hospitals’ EHR technology adoption and advancement patterns prospectively. Objective: This study forecasts the maturation of EHR functionality adoption among U.S. hospitals through 2035. Methods: The HIMSS Analytics’ Electronic Medical Record Adoption Model (EMRAM) dataset was used to track historic uptakes of various EHR functionalities considered critical to improving healthcare quality and efficiency in hospitals. The Bass model was used to predict the technological diffusion rates for repeated EHR adoptions where upgrades undergo rapid technological improvements. The forecast used EMRAM data from 2006 to 2014 to estimate adoption levels to the year 2035. Results: In 2014, over 5,400 hospitals completed HIMSS’ annual EMRAM survey (86%+ of total U.S. hospitals). In 2006, the majority of the U.S. hospitals were in EMRAM stages zero, one and two. By 2014, most hospitals had achieved stages three, four and five of EMRAM. The overall technology diffusion model (i.e., the Bass Model) reached an adjusted R-squared of .91. The final forecast depicted differing trends for each of the EMRAM stages. In 2006, the first year of observation, peaks of stages zero and one were shown as EHR adoption predates HIMSS’ EMRAM. By 2007, Stage-2 reached its peak. Stage-3 reached its full height by 2011, while Stage-4 maxed out by 2014. The first three stages created a graph that exhibits the expected ‘S-curve’ for technology diffusion with inflection point being the peak diffusion rate. The forecast indicates that Stage-5 will reach its peak by 2019 and Stage-6 will top out in 2026. Though this forecast extends to the year 2035, no peak was readily observed for Stage-7. Overall, most hospitals will achieve stages five, six or seven of EMRAM by 2020; however, a considerable number of hospitals will not achieve Stage-7 by 2035. Conclusions: We forecasted the adoption of EHR capabilities from a paper-based environment (Stage-0) to an environment where only electronic information is used to document and direct care delivery (Stage-7). According to our forecasts, the majority of hospitals will not reach Stage-7 until 2035, absent major policy changes or leaps in the technologies’ capabilities. These results indicate that U.S. hospitals are decades away from fully implementing sophisticated decision support applications and interoperability functionalities into their EHR as defined by EMRAM’s Stage-7.