Lennart Elfgren

Prof. Dr. Lennart Elfgren

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

55Years (1972-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2017 in Engineering Structures
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RNRasoul Nilforoush
Rasoul Nilforoush
MNMartin Nilsson
Martin Nilsson
LELennart Elfgren
Lennart Elfgren
Cast-in-place anchor bolts embedded in plain and steel fibre-reinforced normal- and high-strength concrete members were subjected to monotonic tensile loads. The influence of the concrete member thickness, concrete strength, and the addition of steel fibres to the concrete mixture, on the anchorage capacity and performance was evaluated. The experimental results were evaluated in terms of anchorage capacity, anchorage ductility and stiffness as well as failure mode and geometry. Furthermore, the validity of Concrete Capacity (CC) method for predicting the tensile breakout capacity of anchor bolts in plain and steel fibre-reinforced normal- and high-strength concrete members was evaluated. The anchorage capacity and ductility increased slightly with increasing member thickness, whereas the anchorage stiffness decreased slightly. In contrast to the anchorage ductility, the anchorage capacity and stiffness increased considerably with increasing concrete compressive strength. The anchorage capacity and ductility also increased significantly with the addition of steel fibres to the concrete mixtures. This enhanced capacity and ductility resulted from the improved flexural tensile strength and post-peak cracking behavior of steel fibre-reinforced concrete. The average ratio of measured strengths to those predicted by the CC method for anchors in plain concrete members was increased from 1.0 to 1.17 with increasing member thickness. In steel fibre-reinforced concrete, this ratio varied from 1.29 to 1.51, depending on the member thickness and the concrete strength.Validerad;2017;Nivå 2;2017-06-12 (andbra)

1 October 2016 in Construction and Building Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XQXiao-Chuan Qin
Xiao-Chuan Qin
SMShao-Ping Meng
Shao-Ping Meng
DCDa-Fu Cao
Da-Fu Cao
YTYong-Ming Tu
Yong-Ming Tu
NSNatalia Sabourova
Natalia Sabourova
LELennart Elfgren
Lennart Elfgren

12 January 2018 in Structure and Infrastructure Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CPCosmin Popescu
Cosmin Popescu
BTBjörn Täljsten
Björn Täljsten
TBThomas Blanksvärd
Thomas Blanksvärd
LELennart Elfgren
Lennart Elfgren
Routine bridge inspections usually consist of visual observations. These inspections are time-consuming and subjective. There is a need to identify new inspection techniques for infrastructure that reduce traffic disturbance, and improve the efficiency and reliability of the acquired data. This study compared the performance of three different imaging technologies for the three-dimensional (3D) geometric modeling of existing structures: terrestrial laser scanning, close-range photogrammetry, and infrared scanning. Each technology was used to assess six existing concrete railway bridges. The technologies were compared in terms of geometric deviations, visualization capabilities, the level of the inspector’s experience, and degree of automation. The results suggest that all methods investigated can be used to create 3D models, however, with different level of completeness. Measurements such as span length, deck widths, etc. can be extracted with good accuracy. Although promising, a full off-site inspection is currently not feasible as some areas of the bridges were difficult to capture mainly due to restricted access and narrow spaces. Measurements based on terrestrial laser scanning were closer to the reality compared to photogrammetry and infrared scanning. The study indicates the no special training is needed for photogrammetry and infrared scanning to generate a 3D geometric model.

1 March 2017 in Engineering Structures
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NBNiklas Bagge
Niklas Bagge
Jonny NilimaaJonny Nilimaa
Jonny Nilimaa
LELennart Elfgren
Lennart Elfgren

1 March 2000 in Composites Part B: Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BTB Täljsten
B Täljsten
LELennart Elfgren
Lennart Elfgren

1 April 2018 in Journal of Structural Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RNRasoul Nilforoush
Rasoul Nilforoush
MNMartin Nilsson
Martin Nilsson
LELennart Elfgren
Lennart Elfgren
Cast-in-place headed anchors with different head sizes embedded in plain and reinforced concrete members of various thicknesses were subjected to pullout tests. The influence of member thickness, anchor-head size, and orthogonal surface reinforcement on the tensile capacity and performance of anchor bolts was evaluated. The member thickness varied from 1.5 to 3.0 times the anchor embedment depth, and headed anchors with small, medium, and large heads were tested. The experimental results of the study showed that increasing member thickness and/or use of orthogonal surface reinforcement lead to increased anchorage capacity and ductility, whereas the anchorage stiffness decreases slightly. In contrast to anchorage ductility, tensile breakout resistance and anchorage stiffness increased significantly with increasing size of the anchor head. The experimental results corresponded closely to the results of a previous numerical study that suggested a modified model incorporating several modification factors for improving the predictive capability of the concrete capacity (CC) method. In the present study, these factors yielded improved prediction of the tensile breakout capacity of the tested headed anchors.