Paul Norman

Dr. Paul Norman

Centre for Spatial Analysis & Policy, School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

36Years (1991-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2012 in Pediatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LFLorna K. Fraser
Lorna K. Fraser
MMMichael Miller
Michael Miller
RHRichard Hain
Richard Hain
PNPaul Norman
Paul Norman
JAJan Aldridge
Jan Aldridge
RPRoger C. Parslow
Roger C. Parslow
BACKGROUND: Life-limiting conditions (LLCs) describe diseases with no reasonable hope of cure that will ultimately be fatal. For children with these diseases, palliative care services should be available but few data are available to estimate the burden of these conditions. METHODS: Children (0–19 years) with LLCs were identified within an English Hospital Episode Statistics dataset (2000/2001–2009/2010) by applying a customized coding framework of the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, disease codes. Prevalence per 10 000 population (0–19 years) was calculated by age, diagnostic group, ethnicity, deprivation, and region for each year. RESULTS: The Hospital Episode Statistics extract contained 175 286 individuals with 1 or more LLCs of which congenital anomalies were the most common (31%). Prevalence increased over 10 years from 25 to 32 per 10 000 population. Prevalence in the South Asian (48 per 10 000); black (42 per 10 000); and Chinese, mixed, and “other” (31 per 10 000) populations were statistically significantly higher compared with the white population (27 per 10 000). Prevalence shows an inverse J-shaped relationship with 5 categories of deprivation, with the highest prevalence in the most deprived areas and the lowest in the second least deprived. CONCLUSIONS: In 2010, the prevalence of LLCs in children in England was double the previously reported estimates and had increased annually in all areas over the past decade. This clearly identifies an escalating need for specialist pediatric palliative care services. When planning services for these increasing needs, the excess prevalence in ethnic minority groups, especially in deprived areas, needs to be considered.

1 June 2005 in Social Science & Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PNPaul Norman
Paul Norman
PBPaul Boyle
Paul Boyle
PRPhilip Rees
Philip Rees

15 December 2020 in Palliative Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LFLorna Fraser
Lorna Fraser
DGDeborah Gibson-Smith
Deborah Gibson-Smith
SJStuart Jarvis
Stuart Jarvis
PNPaul Norman
Paul Norman
RPRoger C Parslow
Roger C Parslow
Background: Previous studies showed increasing number of children with a life-limiting or life-threatening condition who may benefit from input from pediatric palliative care services. Aim: To estimate the current prevalence of children with a life-limiting condition and to model future prevalence of this population. Design: Observational study using national inpatient hospital data. A population-based approach utilizing ethnic specific population projections was used to estimate future prevalence. Setting/participants: All children aged 0–19 years with a life-limiting condition diagnostic code recorded in Hospital Episodes Statistics data in England from 2000/01 to 2017/18. Results: Data on 4,543,386 hospital episodes for 359,634 individuals were included. The prevalence of children with a life-limiting condition rose from 26.7 per 10,000 (95%CI 26.5–27.0) in 2001/02 to 66.4 per 10,000 (95% CI: 66.0–66.8) in 2017/18. Using a more restricted definition of a life-limiting condition reduced the prevalence from 66.4 to 61.1 per 10,000 (95%CI 60.7–61.5) in 2017/18. Highest prevalence was in the under 1-year age group at 226.5 per 10,000 and children with a congenital abnormality had the highest prevalence (27.2 per 10,000 (95%CI: 26.9–27.5)). The prevalence was highest among the most deprived group and in children of Pakistani origin. Predicted future prevalence of life-limiting conditions ranged from 67.0 (95%CI 67.7–66.3) to 84.22 (95%CI 78.66–90.17) per 10,000 by 2030. Conclusions: The prevalence of children with a life-limiting or life-threatening condition in England has risen over the last 17 years and is predicted to increase. Future data collections must include the data required to assess the complex health and social care needs of these children.

1 September 2018 in Applied Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PRPhilippa Roddis
Philippa Roddis
SCStephen Carver
Stephen Carver
MDMartin Dallimer
Martin Dallimer
PNPaul Norman
Paul Norman
GZGuy Ziv
Guy Ziv

1 May 2014 in Ear & Hearing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDPiers Dawes
Piers Dawes
HFHeather Fortnum
Heather Fortnum
DMDavid R. Moore
David R. Moore
RERichard Emsley
Richard Emsley
PNPaul Norman
Paul Norman
KMKevin Munro
Kevin Munro
Objectives: To report population-based prevalence of hearing impairment based on speech recognition in noise testing in a large and inclusive sample of U.K. adults aged 40 to 69 years. The present study is the first to report such data. Prevalence of tinnitus and use of hearing aids is also reported. Design: The research was conducted using the UK Biobank resource. The better-ear unaided speech reception threshold was measured adaptively using the Digit Triplet Test (n = 164,770). Self-report data on tinnitus, hearing aid use, noise exposure, as well as demographic variables were collected. Results: Overall, 10.7% of adults (95% confidence interval [CI] 10.5–10.9%) had significant hearing impairment. Prevalence of tinnitus was 16.9% (95%CI 16.6–17.1%) and hearing aid use was 2.0% (95%CI 1.9–2.1%). Odds of hearing impairment increased with age, with a history of work- and music-related noise exposure, for lower socioeconomic background and for ethnic minority backgrounds. Males were at no higher risk of hearing impairment than females. Conclusions: Around 1 in 10 adults aged 40 to 69 years have substantial hearing impairment. The reasons for excess risk of hearing impairment particularly for those from low socioeconomic and ethnic minority backgrounds require identification, as this represents a serious health inequality. The underuse of hearing aids has altered little since the 1980s, and is a major cause for concern.

12 August 2009 in Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PNPaul Norman
Paul Norman