The purpose of this study was to compare the results of the Alvarado and Pediatric Appendicitis Score (PAS) scoring systems and to establish which one is more reliable in setting the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children. All children operated on because of acute appendicitis from October 2011 to May 2013 were enrolled in this prospective study. Both clinical scoring systems have been compared over the same patients, and cutoff values were determined by the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. A total of 311 patients were included in the study, and 265 (85.2%) of them had acute appendicitis. Mean Alvarado score for patients with appendicitis was 8.2 and 6.7 for those without (P < 0.001). Mean PAS for patients with appendicitis was of 7.8 and 6.6 for those without (P < 0.001). Based on the ROC curve analysis, a cutoff value for both scoring systems was 7. In patients with acute appendicitis and Alvarado score of 7 or higher, the correct diagnosis would have been set in 236 patients (sensitivity, 89%; specificity, 59%; positive predictive value, 93.1%), whereas in patients with acute appendicitis and a PAS of 7 or higher, the correct diagnosis would have been set in 228 patients (sensitivity, 86%; specificity, 50%; positive predictive value, 90.1%). No significant difference was found in sensitivity and specificity between the observed scoring systems. Both scoring systems can be of assistance in setting the diagnosis of acute appendicitis, but none has adequate predictive values in assessing acute appendicitis and none can be used as an exclusive standard in setting the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children. The final decision still remaines on the opinion of an expert pediatric surgeon.

New hemostatic technologies are often employed in open and laparoscopic surgery to reduce duration of surgery and complications. Monopolar diathermy, Harmonic scalpel and LigaSure are routinely used in open and laparoscopic surgery for tissue cutting and hemostasis. We compared lateral thermal damage following in vivo application of 3 commonly used instruments. We used monopolar diathermy, Harmonic scalpel and LigaSure to coagulate and divide the peritoneum of patients who underwent median laparotomy. After anesthesia, median supraumbilical laparotomy was performed, and the peritoneum of each patient was coagulated using different devices. Using light microscopy and morphometric imaging analysis, the width of tissue lateral thermal damage was measured from the point of the peritoneal incision. We included 100 patients in our study. After a peritoneal incision, the mean lateral thermal damage of monopolar diathermy, Harmonic scalpel (output power 3), Harmonic scalpel (output power 5) and LigaSure were 215.79 μm, 90.42 μm, 127.48 μm and 144.18 μm, respectively. The degree of lateral thermal spread varied by instrument type, power setting and application time. LigaSure and Harmonic scalpel were the safest and most efficient methods of tissue coagulation. Monopolar diathermy resulted in the greatest degree of thermal damage in tissues.

Background: The aim of this study is the evaluation of clinical signs and outcomes of treatment in children under five years of age who underwent appendectomy because of acute appendicitis. Patients and Methods: From January 2009 until December 2018, 90 patients (54 boys and 36 girls) younger than five years of age, treated with appendectomy because of acute appendicitis, were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups, depending on the intra-operative finding of non-perforated (Group I; n = 32) or perforated (Group II; n = 58) appendicitis. The groups were compared regarding demographic, clinical, and laboratory data and outcomes of treatment. Results: Of 1687 appendectomies in this period, 90 (5.3%) of them were performed in patients aged five years or younger. There were 58 (64.4%) patients with perforated appendix. Positive correlation between the rate of perforation and the age of patients was found. Perforation rates were significantly higher in younger patients (100%, <1 year; 100%, 1–2 y; 83.3%, 2–3 y; 71.4%, 3–4 y; 78.6%, 4–5 y, and 47.3%, 5 y) (p = 0.037). Vomiting and diarrhea were found more commonly in the group of perforated appendix (p < 0.002, p < 0.001), while constipation was found more often in the patients whose appendix was not perforated (p < 0.001). The median duration of symptoms (48 h vs. 16 h; p < 0.001) and median duration of hospitalization (7.5 d vs. 5 d; p < 0.001) were notably longer for the group of patients with perforated than the group of patients with non-perforated appendix. All complications occurred in the group of perforated appendix with total incidence of 4.4%. Conclusion: The clinical presentation of acute appendicitis for children aged five years or younger is often unusual, and establishing the proper diagnosis is often delayed. Patient age is tied closely to the stage of acute appendicitis, so the youngest patients present with more advanced stages of disease and are at greater risk of perforation. Acute appendicitis should be considered in all cases where a child is having abdominal pain, fever, and diarrhea, which has been shown to be present significantly more often in children with perforated appendix.