Background and objectives: FSGS recurrence after kidney transplantation is a major risk factor for graft loss. However, the natural history, clinical predictors, and response to treatment remain unclear because of small sample sizes and poor generalizability of single-center studies, and disease misclassification in registry-based studies. We therefore aimed to determine the incidence, predictors, and treatment response of recurrent FSGS in a large cohort of kidney transplant recipients. Design, setting, participants, & measurements: The Post-Transplant Glomerular Disease (TANGO) project is an observational, multicenter, international cohort study that aims to investigate glomerular disease recurrence post-transplantation. Transplant recipients were screened for the diagnosis of idiopathic FSGS between 2005 and 2015 and details were recorded about the transplant, clinical outcomes, treatments, and other risk factors. Results: Among 11,742 kidney transplant recipients screened for FSGS, 176 had a diagnosis of idiopathic FSGS and were included. FSGS recurred in 57 patients (32%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 25% to 39%) and 39% of them lost their graft over a median of 5 (interquartile range, 3.0–8.1) years. Multivariable Cox regression revealed a higher risk for recurrence with older age at native kidney disease onset (hazard ratio [HR], 1.37 per decade; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.56). Other predictors were white race (HR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.08 to 4.22), body mass index at transplant (HR, 0.89 per kg/m²; 95% CI, 0.83 to 0.95), and native kidney nephrectomies (HR, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.16 to 6.57). Plasmapheresis and rituximab were the most frequent treatments (81%). Partial or complete remission occurred in 57% of patients and was associated with better graft survival. Conclusions: Idiopathic FSGS recurs post-transplant in one third of cases and is associated with a five-fold higher risk of graft loss. Response to treatment is associated with significantly better outcomes but is achieved in only half of the cases.

Membranous nephropathy (MN) is a leading cause of kidney failure worldwide, and frequently recurs after transplant. Available data originated from small retrospective cohort studies or registry analyses. Therefore, uncertainties remain on risk factors for MN recurrence and response to therapy. Within the Post-Transplant Glomerular Disease (TANGO) Consortium, we conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study examining the MN recurrence rate, risk factors, and response to treatment. This study screened 22,921 patients across three continents and included 194 patients who underwent a kidney transplant due to biopsy-proven MN. The cumulative incidence of MN recurrence was 31% at 10 years post-transplant. Patients with a faster progression towards end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) were at higher risk of developing recurrent MN (hazard ratio (HR) of 0.55 per decade (95%CI; 0.35-0.88). Moreover, elevated pre-transplant levels of anti-PLA2R antibodies were strongly associated with recurrence (HR 18.58; 95%CI; 5.37- 64.27). Patients receiving rituximab for MN recurrence had a higher likelihood of achieving remission than patients receiving RAAS inhibition alone. In sum, MN recurs in one-third of patients post-transplant and serum PLA2R antibodies shortly before transplant could aid in risk-stratifying patients for MN recurrence. Moreover, patients receiving rituximab had a higher rate of treatment response.

Frailty is associated with poorer outcomes among patients waiting for kidney transplantation (KT). Several different tools to measure frailty have been used; however, their predictive value is unknown. This is a prospective longitudinal study of 449 KT candidates evaluated for frailty by the Physical Frailty Phenotype (PFP) and the FRAIL scale. During the study period, 296 patients received a KT, while 153 remained listed. Patients who did not get receive a transplant were more frequently frail according to PFP (16.3 vs. 7.4%, p = 0.013). Robust patients had fewer hospital admissions during the 1st year after listing (20.8% if PFP = 0 vs. 43.4% if ≥1, and 27.1% if FRAIL = 0 vs. 48.9% if ≥1) and fewer cardiovascular events (than FRAIL ≥ 1) or major infectious events (than PFP ≥ 1). According to PFP, scoring 1 point had an impact on patient survival and chance of transplantation in the univariate analysis. The multivariable analysis corroborated the result, as candidates with PFP ≥ 3 had less likelihood of transplantation (HR 0.45 [0.26–0.77]). The FRAIL scale did not associate with any of these outcomes. In KT candidates, pre-frailty and frailty according to both the PFP and the FRAIL scale were associated with poorer results while listed. The PFP detected that frail patients were less likely to receive a KT, while the FRAIL scale did not.

The evaluation of the measured Glomerular Filtration Rate (mGFR) or estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) is key in the proper assessment of the renal function of potential kidney donors. We aim to study the correlation between glomerular filtration rate estimation equations and the measured methods for determining renal function. We analysed the relationship between baseline GFR values measured by Tc-⁹⁹m-DTPA (diethylene-triamine-pentaacetate) and those estimated by the four-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD4) and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations in a series of living donors at our institution. We included 64 donors (70.6% females; mean age 48.3±11 years). Baseline creatinine was 0.8±0.1 mg/dl and it was 1.1±0.2 mg/dl one year after donation. The equations underestimated GFR when measured by Tc⁹⁹m-DTPA (MDRD4-9.4 ± 25ml/min, P<.05, and CKD-EPI-4.4 ± 21ml/min). The correlation between estimation equations and the measured method was superior for CKD-EPI (r=.41; P<.004) than for MDRD4 (r=.27; P<.05). eGFR decreased to 59.6±11 (MDRD4) and 66.2±14ml/min (CKD-EPI) one year after donation. This means a mean eGFR reduction of 28.2±16.7 ml/min (MDRD4) and 27.31±14.4 ml/min (CKD-EPI) at one year. In our experience, CKD-EPI is the equation that better correlates with mGFR-Tc⁹⁹m-DTPA when assessing renal function for donor screening purposes.

Background Frailty is common among advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients who are kidney transplant (KT) candidates, and predisposes to poor outcomes after transplantation. However, frailty is not routinely measured during pretransplant work-up and it is unknown which metric should be used in this specific population. Our aim was to establish frailty prevalence in KT candidates according to different frailty scales. Methods Prospective longitudinal study of 451 KT candidates evaluated for frailty by both Physical Frailty Phenotype (PFP) and FRAIL scale at the time of inclusion on the KT waiting list. Clinical and functional characteristics including sociodemographics, comorbidities, disability and nutritional status were recorded. Agreement between PFP and FRAIL scales as well as dissonant patients were analyzed. Results Mean age was 60.9 years and 31.7% were female. Comorbidity burden among patients was high, with 36.9% and 16.2% presenting with diabetes and ischemic coronary disease, respectively. Disabilities were also frequent. More than 70% of patients presented with ≥ 1 PFP criteria while this percentage for ≥ 1 FRAIL criteria was 45.4%. Agreement between PFP and FRAIL was not good (kappa index 0.317). There were 132 patients who were pre-frail or frail according to PFP but non-frail according to the FRAIL scale and they presented with fewer comorbidities and less disability. Conclusions Frailty is frequent in advanced CKD patients, although its prevalence may vary according to different scales. Agreement between PFP and FRAIL scale is not good, and FRAIL scale might misclassify as robust patients those frail/prefrail patients who are in better health conditions. Graphical abstract

Introduction Delayed graft function (DGF) is associated with poorer graft survival and higher rate of acute rejection (AR). It is unknown if this negative influence relies on the increased risk of AR or the DGF itself. The different Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) values may also play a role in this interaction. Methods Retrospective study aimed to evaluate the impact of DGF on graft function and graft survival in a subset of KT recipients (2004‐2017). We also analyzed the relationship between KDPI and DGF. Results The study includes601 KT,226of them (37%) developed DGF. Graft survival was lower in patients with DGF compared with non‐DGF patients. Multivariable analysis revealed DGF as risk factor for graft loss, independently of the presence or not of acute rejection. Between DGF patients we observed poorer graft survival in patients with higher KDPI value (>85%).We observed a trend of a greater impact of KDPI in patients with DGF, although this interaction was not statistically significant. Additionally, we observed poorer 12‐month graft function in DGF patients. Conclusion DGF is related to poorer graft survival independently of the developed of acute rejection. This negative impact might be influenced by high KDPI values.