Ute Botzenhart

Dr. Ute Botzenhart

Department of Orthodontics, Carl Gustav Carus Campus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, D-01307 Dresden, Germany
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2016 in Biomedical Engineering / Biomedizinische Technik
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Jacek MatysJacek Matys
Jacek Matys
Ute BotzenhartUte Botzenhart
Ute Botzenhart
TGTomasz Gedrange
Tomasz Gedrange
Marzena DominiakMarzena Dominiak
Marzena Dominiak
Many inserted implants are affected by peri-implantitis. The aim of our study was to evaluate increases in implant temperature, depending on the diameter and chemical composition of implants. In particular we measured the time it takes for the temperature of an implant to rise by 10°C and evaluated laser power settings required to prevent thermal injury when an implant surface is decontaminated during the treatment of peri-implantitis. The study analysed six implants placed in porcine ribs and divided into two groups according to their diameter and chemical composition (grade IV and grade V titanium). The implants were irradiated with Diode and Er:YAG lasers using different laser parameters. The temperature was measured with a K-type thermocouple. The temperature on the implant surface rose as the laser power increased and the implant diameter decreased. The time required to increase the temperature of an implant by 10°C was less than it was for titanium grade IV. The temperature gradient was below 10°C for all implants treated using a laser power up to 1 W. It is important to choose the correct laser parameters, depending on the chemical composition and diameter of the implant, so that decontamination of the implant surface is thorough, effective and safe.

30 June 2017 in Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PKPawel Kubasiewicz-Ross
Pawel Kubasiewicz-Ross
Marzena DominiakMarzena Dominiak
Marzena Dominiak
TGTomasz Gedrange
Tomasz Gedrange
Ute BotzenhartUte Botzenhart
Ute Botzenhart
The authors present the contemporary state of knowledge concerning alternative materials for dental implantology. First of all, factors influencing osseointegration are stated. The most important factors seem to be the type of implant surface. Among the numerous parameters describing them, the most important are: average roughness and porous density. Some studies proved that materials with comparable surface roughness provide similar osseointegration. In modern implantology titanium is the material still considered as a "gold standard". However, aesthetic features of titanium still bear several disadvantages, especially in the case of periodontium with a thin biotype in the anterior, aesthetic sensitive area of the jaw. If a titanium implant is used in such a case, the mucosa at the implant's neck may become grayish and, consequently limits the success of the overall treatment. That was the reason for seeking alternative materials to manufacture dental implants. Initiated by general medicine, mainly orthopedics, the search led to the discovery of zirconium dioxide used in dental implantology. A small number of complications, good chemical parameters, anticorrosion, mechanical strength, elasticity module close to the one of steel, and especially biocompatibility made zirconium a perfect material for this purpose, although this material presents several problems in achieving optimal roughness. In this overview one of the probable methods, a process of partial synterization, is presented.

1 January 2015 in Materials Science and Engineering: C
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CKChristiane Kunert-Keil
Christiane Kunert-Keil
Tomasz GredesTomasz Gredes
Tomasz Gredes
FHFriedhelm Heinemann
Friedhelm Heinemann
Marzena DominiakMarzena Dominiak
Marzena Dominiak
Ute BotzenhartUte Botzenhart
Ute Botzenhart
TGTomasz Gedrange
Tomasz Gedrange

11 February 2021 in BMC Oral Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LMLiesa Heidi Möller
Liesa Heidi Möller
WPWinnie Pradel
Winnie Pradel
TGTomasz Gedrange
Tomasz Gedrange
Ute BotzenhartUte Botzenhart
Ute Botzenhart
BackgroundThe distribution of dental abnormalities among cleft patients concerning cleft type frequently poses ambiguity wherefore the aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of hypodontia and supernumerary teeth in an exemplary German cleft population dependent on the cleft type.MethodsRadiographs and dental records of cleft patients, which had been treated and followed up in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Campus, Dresden, Germany (investigation period of 22 years) were evaluated concerning hypodontia and supernumerary teeth dependent on the cleft type. Out of 386 records, 108 patients met the inclusion criteria: non-syndromic cleft of the alveolus with or without palate (CL/P), at least one clear panoramic x-ray, sufficient dental records. Statistical analysis was performed using x-square and binominal test (p <= 0.05).ResultsHypodontia was more frequent (54/50%) than supernumerary teeth (36/33.3%) and was more common in bilateral clefts of the lip and palate (BCLP) (70.1%) than in unilateral clefts of the lip and palate (UCLP) (51.6%) or clefts of the lip and alveolus (CLA) (34.5%) (p<<0.001). There was an average of 0.9 missing teeth per patient, thereof the upper lateral incisor was most often affected (23.2%). In contrast, supernumerary teeth were more frequent in CLA (51.7%; p=0.014) than UCLP (29.0%) and BCLP patients (17.6%).ConclusionThe prevalence for numerical dental anomalies was significantly different among the cleft types. Hypodontia significantly increased with the extend of the cleft, whereas the prevalence of supernumerary teeth decreased.

1 May 2015 in Annals of Anatomy - Anatomischer Anzeiger
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Ute BotzenhartUte Botzenhart
Ute Botzenhart
CKChristiane Kunert-Keil
Christiane Kunert-Keil
FHFriedhelm Heinemann
Friedhelm Heinemann
TGTomasz Gredes
Tomasz Gredes
JSJuliane Seiler
Juliane Seiler
TGTomasz Gedrange
Tomasz Gedrange

7 August 2018 in Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Ute BotzenhartUte Botzenhart
Ute Botzenhart
RGRicarda Gerlach
Ricarda Gerlach
TGTomasz Gredes
Tomasz Gredes
IRInes Rentzsch
Ines Rentzsch
TGTomasz Gedrange
Tomasz Gedrange
CKChristiane Kunert-Keil
Christiane Kunert-Keil
Background. The mdx mouse, the most approved animal model for basic research in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), has the ability to compensate muscle degeneration by regeneration process, which is obvious at approx. 3 months of age. Hence, this mouse model is only temporarily suitable to proof craniofacial changes which are usually evident in humans with the progression of the disease. Objectives. The purpose of our study was to examine the impact of botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) in influencing muscle regeneration in the masticatory muscles of healthy and mdx mice. Material and methods. Chemo-denervation of the right masseter muscle was induced in 100-day-old, healthy and dystrophic mice by a specific intramuscular BTX-A injection. Gene expression and protein content of myogenic regulatory factors and muscle growth factor (MyoD1, myogenin and myostatin) in the right and left masseter, temporal and the tongue muscle were determined 4 and 21 days after injection, respectively, using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and western blot technique. Results. The 4 day and 21 day interval proved significant but varying changes of mRNA expression in both control and mdx mice. At the protein level, myogenin expression was increased in the temporal and masseter muscle on the injection side in controls, whereas dystrophic mice showed the same effect for MyoD1 expression. Additionally, increased protein expression of all studied genes could be found in dystrophic mice compared to controls, except the left temporal and the tongue muscle. Conclusions. Muscle regeneration is not constant in BTX-A injected mdx masticatory muscles, presumably due to the already exhausted capacity or functional loss of satellite cells caused by dystrophin deficiency, and, therefore, disturbed regeneration potential of myofibrils. Botulinum toxin A injection cannot fully break down regulatory processes at molecular level in 100-day-old mdx mice. Further investigations are necessary to fully understand the regeneration process following BTX-A injection into dystrophic muscles.