David Amouroux

Dr. David Amouroux

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 1999 in Global Biogeochemical Cycles
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AKA. J. Kettle
A. J. Kettle
MAM. O. Andreae
M. O. Andreae
DADavid Amouroux
David Amouroux
TAT. W. Andreae
T. W. Andreae
TBT. S. Bates
T. S. Bates
GUG. Uher
G. Uher
A database of 15,617 point measurements of dimethylsulfide (DMS) in surface waters along with lesser amounts of data for aqueous and particulate dimethylsulfoniopropionate concentration, chlorophyll concentration, sea surface salinity and temperature, and wind speed has been assembled. The database was processed to create a series of climatological annual and monthly 1°×1° latitude‐longitude squares of data. The results were compared to published fields of geophysical and biological parameters. No significant correlation was found between DMS and these parameters, and no simple algorithm could be found to create monthly fields of sea surface DMS concentration based on these parameters. Instead, an annual map of sea surface DMS was produced using an algorithm similar to that employed byConkright et al.[1994]. In this approach, a first‐guess field of DMS sea surface concentration measurements is created and then a correction to this field is generated based on actual measurements. Monthly sea surface grids of DMS were obtained using a similar scheme, but the sparsity of DMS measurements made the method difficult to implement. A scheme was used which projected actual data into months of the year where no data were otherwise present.

1 October 2007 in Marine Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MMMonperrus Mathilde
Monperrus Mathilde
ETE. Tessier
E. Tessier
DADavid Amouroux
David Amouroux
ALA. Leynaert
A. Leynaert
PHP. Huonnic
P. Huonnic
ODO.F.X. Donard
O.F.X. Donard

19 November 2009 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PRPablo Rodríguez-Gonzálvez
Pablo Rodríguez-Gonzálvez
VEVladimir N. Epov
Vladimir N. Epov
RBRomain Bridou
Romain Bridou
ETEmmanuel Tessier
Emmanuel Tessier
RGRemy Guyoneaud
Remy Guyoneaud
DADavid Amouroux
David Amouroux

1 November 2006 in Biochimie
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CLCatherine Leblanc
Catherine Leblanc
CCCarole Colin
Carole Colin
ACAudrey Cosse
Audrey Cosse
LDLudovic Delage
Ludovic Delage
SBStéphane La Barre
Stéphane La Barre
PPPhilippe POTIN
Philippe POTIN

1 January 1997 in Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CTChun Mao Tseng
Chun Mao Tseng
ADAlberto De Diego
Alberto De Diego
FMFabienne M. Martin
Fabienne M. Martin
DADavid Amouroux
David Amouroux
ODOlivier F. X. Donard
Olivier F. X. Donard
A rapid and simple microwave-assisted digestion method with alkaline solution (tetramethylammonium hydroxide or methanolic KOH solution) for speciation analysis of inorganic mercury and methylmercury (MeHg + ) in biological tissues was developed. Extracts with quantitative recoveries of mercury species after microwave-assisted alkaline dissolution of the sample were directly analysed by an automated on-line hyphenated system incorporating aqueous hydride generation, cryogenic trapping, gas chromatography and detection by atomic absorption spectrometry. Optimum conditions allow sample throughput to be controlled by the instrumental analysis time (≈10 min per sample) and not by the sample preparation step. At a power of 40–60 W, sample preparation time is only 2–4 min, which is much faster than previous literature methods. The proposed method was validated by the analysis of three biological certified reference materials, CRM 463, DORM-1 and TORT-1, and one BCR sample from an interlaboratory study, Tuna Fish 2. The detection limit of the overall procedure was found to be 3 ng per gram of pulverised dried biological tissue, for both labile Hg 2+ and MeHg + . After alkaline extraction, a mean recovery of 102% with a relative standard deviation of 7% was obtained for methylmercury concentrations ranging from 0.128 to 3.464 µg g -1 as Hg in the four reference fish tissues mentioned above. Total mercury, calculated as the sum of determined inorganic mercury and methylmercury, was also in agreement with the certified values. The methylmercury extraction efficiency of five extractants, viz. , nitric, hydrochloric and acetic acid, and tetramethylammonium hydroxide and methanolic KOH solution, the temperature profile of these extractants under microwave irradiation and the behaviour and stability of methylmercury in a focused microwave field were also investigated.

29 October 2010 in Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RBRomain Bridou
Romain Bridou
MMMonperrus Mathilde
Monperrus Mathilde
PGPablo Rodriguez Gonzalez
Pablo Rodriguez Gonzalez
RGRemy Guyoneaud
Remy Guyoneaud
DADavid Amouroux
David Amouroux