This paper uses techniques from evolutionary robotics to predict the most energy-efficient upright walking gait for the early human relativeAustralopithecus afarensis, based on the proportions of the 3.2 million year old AL 288-1 ‘Lucy’ skeleton, and matches predictions against the nearly contemporaneous (3.5–3.6 million year old) Laetoli fossil footprint trails. The technique creates gaitsde novoand uses genetic algorithm optimization to search for the most efficient patterns of simulated muscular contraction at a variety of speeds. The model was first verified by predicting gaits for living human subjects, and comparing costs, stride lengths and speeds to experimentally determined values for the same subjects. Subsequent simulations forA. afarensisyield estimates of the range of walking speeds from 0.6 to 1.3 m s⁻¹at a cost of 7.0 J kg⁻¹ m⁻¹for the lowest speeds, falling to 5.8 J kg⁻¹ m⁻¹at 1.0 m s⁻¹, and rising to 6.2 J kg⁻¹ m⁻¹at the maximum speed achieved. Speeds previously estimated for the makers of the Laetoli footprint trails (0.56 or 0.64 m s⁻¹for Trail 1, 0.72 or 0.75 m s⁻¹for Trail 2/3) may have been underestimated, substantially so for Trail 2/3, with true values in excess of 0.7 and 1.0 m s⁻¹, respectively. The predictions conflict with suggestions thatA. afarensisused a ‘shuffling’ gait, indicating rather that the species was a fully competent biped.

We present force plate data on vertical free moments (force couples in the horizontal plane between the foot and the ground) and on transverse force during unloaded walking in different modes and at different speeds (including running) by adults of both sexes and by children, and examine loaded walking by adult males and one boy. Free moments in slow and normal-speed walking are characterised by a lateral peak in the accelerative phase of stance, but the peak during running, and in some cases of fast walking, occurs in the deceleration phase. Free moments are strongly affected by arm fixation in males, but less so in females. The pattern, but not the scale, of free moments is affected by loading position and side, but load magnitude has little effect if the loaded weight is treated as part of the body. Transverse force is more variable than sagittal force. In males, the transverse force curve shows a marked trough at mid-stance, whereas in females this trough is rarely seen. The transverse force of males also differs from that of females in response to arm fixation, showing a local medial inflection at three-quarters of the stance phase that is not present in females. Adults differ from children younger than 9 years in the presence of a very short, medially directed peak following heel-strike. Analysis of the effects of arm fixation and the timing of forces suggests strongly that arm-swing and free moments tend to reinforce each other in balancing trunk torques induced by the lower limbs. Both are of reduced importance in slow walking.

Forward head posture (FHP) is a common postural deviation. An increasing number of studies have reported that people with FHP present with impaired postural control and gait; however, there is conflicting evidence. A systematic review focusing on these relationships has been unavailable to date. Is there a relationship between FHP, postural control and gait? This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement (PROSPERO ID: CRD42021231908). Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL Plus (via EBSCO) were systematically searched, and a manual search was performed using the reference lists of included studies. Eligible studies included observational studies addressing the relationship between FHP, postural control and/or gait. Quality assessment was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Cross-Sectional Studies. Nineteen studies were selected for this review. Consistent evidence supported that people with FHP had significant alterations in limits of stability (n = 3), performance-based balance (n = 3), and cervical proprioception (n = 4). Controversial evidence existed for a relationship of FHP with static balance (n = 4) and postural stability control (n = 4). Limited evidence existed to support an alteration in gait and vestibular function. Three studies on induced FHP consistently identified no reduced postural control. Current evidence supports an association between FHP and a detrimental alteration in limits of stability, performance-based balance, and cervical proprioception. Instead of simply indicating impaired overall balance, the findings of this review indicate that a reduction in specific aspects of the postural control requires to be clarified in clinical evaluation for individuals with FHP, which would facilitate the planning and application of appropriate interventions to prevent dysfunctions and disability.