In the context of the Covid-19 pandemic, the development and validation of rapid and easy-to-perform diagnostic methods are of high priority. We evaluated a novel rapid antigen detection test (RDT) for SARS-CoV-2 in respiratory samples. The fluorescence immunochromatographic SARS-CoV-2 antigen test (Bioeasy Biotechnology Co., Shenzhen, China) was evaluated using universal transport medium with nasopharyngeal (NP) and oropharyngeal (OP) swabs from suspected Covid-19 cases. Diagnostic accuracy was determined in comparison to SARS-CoV-2 real time (RT)-PCR. A total of 127 samples were included; 82 were RT-PCR positive. Median patients' age was 38 years, 53.5% were male, and 93.7% were from the first week after symptom onset. Overall sensitivity and specificity were 93.9% (CI95% 86.5-97.4) and 100% (CI95% 92.1-100), respectively, with a diagnostic accuracy of 96.1% and Kappa coefficient of 0.9. Sensitivity was significantly higher in samples with high viral loads. The evaluated RDT showed a high sensitivity and specificity in samples mainly obtained during the first week of symptoms and with high viral loads, despite the use of a non-validated sample material. The assay has the potential to become an important tool for early diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2, particularly in situations with limited access to molecular methods.
8 September 2016 in New England Journal of Medicine
Scrub typhus is a life-threatening zoonosis caused by Orientia tsutsugamushi organisms that are transmitted by the larvae of trombiculid mites. Endemic scrub typhus was originally thought to be confined to the so called “tsutsugamushi triangle” within the Asia–Pacific region. In 2006, however, two individual cases were detected in the Middle East and South America, which suggested that the pathogen was present farther afield. Here, we report three autochthonous cases of scrub typhus caused by O. tsutsugamushi acquired on Chiloé Island in southern Chile, which suggests the existence of an endemic focus in South America. (Funded by the Chilean Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica and the Wellcome Trust.)
1 July 2006 in Clinical Microbiology and Infection
Stool samples from patients with abdominal symptoms were used to evaluate different copro-diagnostic assays for the detection of Giardia and Cryptosporidium. Results from microscopical examination following conventional stool concentration and direct fluorescent-antibody methods were compared with various commercially available immunochromatographic and enzyme immunoassays. Of 220 samples, 45 were positive for Giardia and 17 for Cryptosporidium. For Giardia, the sensitivities obtained by Ridascreen Giardia, Rida Quick Giardia, Rida Quick Combi and Giardia-Strip were 82%, 80%, 80% and 44%, respectively. For Cryptosporidium, the sensitivities obtained by Rida Quick Cryptosporidium, Ridascreen Cryptosporidium, Rida Quick Combi and Cryptosporidium-Strip were 88%, 82%, 82% and 75%, respectively. The specificity of all tests was > or = 98%. Other intestinal parasites were present in 68 samples, but cross-reactions with other protozoan or helminthic parasites were not observed. Overall, the copro-antigen assays were less time-consuming and easier to perform, but were less sensitive than conventional microscopical methods. Thus, these tests might be a useful addition to, but not a substitute for microscopical methods in the diagnosis of travel-associated giardiasis and cryptosporidiosis.
The diagnosis of schistosomiasis in individuals from countries where the disease is not endemic is challenging, and few data are available on the accuracy of serological diagnosis in those patients. We evaluated the performance of eight serological assays, including four commercial kits, in the diagnosis of imported schistosomiasis in individuals from areas where the disease is not endemic, including six enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays using three different antigens, an indirect hemagglutination assay, and an indirect immunofluorescent-antibody test. To analyze the assays, we used a total of 141 serum samples, with 121 derived from patients with various parasitic infections (among which were 37 cases of schistosomiasis) and 20 taken from healthy volunteers. The sensitivity values for detection of schistosomiasis cases ranged from 41% to 78% and were higher for Schistosoma mansoni than for S. haematobium infections. Specificity values ranged from 76% to 100%; false-positive results were most frequent for samples from patients with cestode infections. By combining two or more tests, sensitivity improved markedly and specificity decreased only moderately. Serological tests are useful instruments for diagnosing imported schistosomiasis in countries where the disease is not endemic, but due to limitations in test sensitivities, we recommend the use of two or more assays in parallel.