Nicolas Penel

Prof. Nicolas Penel

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
10 November 2008 in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NPNicolas Penel
Nicolas Penel
BBBinh Nguyen Bui
Binh Nguyen Bui
JBJacques-Olivier Bay
Jacques-Olivier Bay
DCDidier Cupissol
Didier Cupissol
IRIsabelle Ray-Coquard
Isabelle Ray-Coquard
Jaen-Yves BlayJaen-Yves Blay
Jaen-Yves Blay
Purpose: The objective of this phase II trial was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of weekly paclitaxel for patients with metastatic or unresectable angiosarcoma. Patients and Methods: Thirty patients were entered onto the study from April 2005 through October 2006. Paclitaxel was administered intravenously as a 60-minute infusion at a dose of 80 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 4-week cycle. The primary end point was the nonprogression rate after two cycles. Results: The progression-free survival rates after 2 and 4 months were 74% and 45%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 8 months, the median time to progression was 4 months and the median overall survival was 8 months. The progression-free survival rate was similar in patients pretreated with chemotherapy and in chemotherapy-naïve patients (77% v 71%). Three patients with locally advanced breast angiosarcoma presented partial response, which enabled a secondary curative-intent surgery with complete histologic response in two cases. One toxic death occurred as a result of a thrombocytopenia episode. Six patients presented with grade 3 toxicities and one patient presented with a grade 4 toxicity. Anemia and fatigue were the most frequently reported toxicities. Conclusion: Weekly paclitaxel at the dose schedule used in the current study was well tolerated and demonstrated clinical benefit.

1 November 2012 in The Lancet Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
IRIsabelle Ray-Coquard
Isabelle Ray-Coquard
Jaen-Yves BlayJaen-Yves Blay
Jaen-Yves Blay
AIAntoine Italiano
Antoine Italiano
ACAxel Le Cesne
Axel Le Cesne
NPNicolas Penel
Nicolas Penel
BBBinh Nguyen Bui
Binh Nguyen Bui

23 June 2017 in Annals of Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Bernd KasperBernd Kasper
Bernd Kasper
CBC. Baumgarten
C. Baumgarten
JGJ. Garcia
J. Garcia
SBS. Bonvalot
S. Bonvalot
Rick HaasRick Haas
Rick Haas
MWM. Wartenberg
M. Wartenberg
Desmoid-type fibromatosis is a rare and locally aggressive monoclonal, fibroblastic proliferation characterized by a variable and often unpredictable clinical course. Currently, there is no established or evidence-based treatment approach available for this disease. Therefore, in 2015 the European Desmoid Working Group published a position paper giving recommendations on the treatment of this intriguing disease. Here, we present an update of this consensus approach based on professionals’ AND patients’ expertise following a round table meeting bringing together sarcoma experts from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group with patients and patient advocates from Sarcoma PAtients EuroNet. In this paper, we focus on new findings regarding the prognostic value of mutational analysis in desmoid-type fibromatosis patients and new systemic treatment options.

1 January 2018 in JAMA Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MTMaud Toulmonde
Maud Toulmonde
NPNicolas Penel
Nicolas Penel
JAJulien Adam
Julien Adam
CCChristine Chevreau
Christine Chevreau
JBJean-Yves Blay
Jean-Yves Blay
ANTOINE ITALIANOANTOINE ITALIANO
ANTOINE ITALIANO
Importance There is a strong rationale for treating sarcomas with immunotherapy. Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) targeting in combination with metronomic chemotherapy in sarcomas. Design, Setting, and Participants This was an open-label, multicenter, phase 2 study of 4 cohorts of patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma (STS), including leiomyosarcoma (LMS), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS), other sarcomas (others), and gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). All patients received 50 mg twice daily cyclophosphamide 1 week on and 1 week off and 200 mg of intravenous pembrolizumab every 3 weeks. Intervention or Exposure Pembrolizumab in combination with metronomic cyclophosphamide. Main Outcomes and Measures There was a dual primary end point, encompassing both the nonprogression and objective responses at 6 months per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) v1.1 for LMS, UPS, and others and 6-month nonprogression for GIST. An objective response rate of 20% and/or a 6-month nonprogression rate of 60% were determined as reasonable objectives for treatment with meaningful effect. Correlative studies of immune biomarkers were planned from patient tumor and plasma samples. Results Between June 2015 and July 2016, 57 patients were included (median [range] age, 59.5 [18.5-84.0] years; 24 women [42%]); 50 patients were assessable for the efficacy end point. Three patients experienced tumor shrinkage, resulting in a partial response in a single solitary fibrous tumor. The 6-month nonprogression rates were 0%, 0%, 14.3% (95% CI, 1.8%-42.8%) for LMS, UPS, and others, respectively, and 11.1% (95% CI, 2.8%-48.3%) for GIST. The most frequent adverse events were grade 1 or 2 fatigue, diarrhea, and anemia. The only patient who experienced partial response was the only one with strong programmed cell death 1 ligand 1–positive staining in immune cell. Strong infiltration by macrophage expressing the inhibitory enzyme indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) was observed in the majority of cases. Moreover, a significant increase in the kynurenine to tryptophan ratio was observed in patient plasma samples during the study treatment. Conclusions and Relevance We found that PD-1 inhibition has limited activity in selected STS and GIST. This may be explained by an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment resulting from macrophage infiltration and IDO1 pathway activation. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier:NCT02406781

28 August 2017 in Annals of Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Jaen-Yves BlayJaen-Yves Blay
Jaen-Yves Blay
PSP. Soibinet
P. Soibinet
NPNicolas Penel
Nicolas Penel
EBE. Bompas
E. Bompas
FDF. Duffaud
F. Duffaud
ACA. Le Cesne
A. Le Cesne
Sarcomas are rare but aggressive diseases. Specialized multidisciplinary management is not implemented for all patients in most countries. We investigated the impact of a multidisciplinary tumor board (MDTB) presentation before treatment in a nationwide study over 5 years. NETSARC (netsarc.org) is a network of 26 reference sarcoma centers with specialized MDTB, funded by the French National Cancer Institute to improve the outcome of sarcoma patients. Since 2010, presentation to an MDTB and second pathological review are mandatory for sarcoma patients in France. Patients’ characteristics and follow-up are collected in a database regularly monitored and updated. The management and survival of patients presented to these MDTB before versus after initial treatment were analyzed. Out of the 12 528 patients aged ≥15 years, with a first diagnosis of soft tissue and visceral sarcoma obtained between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2014, 5281 (42.2%) and 7247 (57.8%) were presented to the MDTB before and after the initiation of treatment, respectively. The former group had generally worse prognostic characteristics. Presentation to a MDTB before treatment was associated with a better compliance to clinical practice guidelines, for example, biopsy before surgery, imaging, quality of initial surgery, and less reoperations (all P < 0.001). Local relapse-free survival and relapse-free survival were significantly better in patients presented to a MDTB before initiation of treatment, both in univariate and multivariate analysis. The compliance to clinical practice guidelines and relapse-free survival of sarcoma patients are significantly better when the initial treatment is guided by a pre-therapeutic specialized MDTB.

7 October 2013 in Annals of Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ANTOINE ITALIANOANTOINE ITALIANO
ANTOINE ITALIANO
OMOlivier Mir
Olivier Mir
ACA. Cioffi
A. Cioffi
Emanuela PalmeriniEmanuela Palmerini
Emanuela Palmerini
SPS. Piperno-Neumann
S. Piperno-Neumann
Jaen-Yves BlayJaen-Yves Blay
Jaen-Yves Blay
There are limited data about the role of chemotherapy in patients with advanced chondrosarcomas. The medical charts of 180 patients with advanced chondrosarcomas having received chemotherapy in 15 participating institutions between 1988 and 2011 were reviewed. Median age was 52 years. Sixty-three percent of patients had conventional chondrosarcoma and 88% had metastatic disease. Combination chemotherapy was delivered in 98 cases (54.5%). One hundred and thirty-one patients (73%) received an anthracycline-containing regimen. Using RECIST, the objective response rate was significantly different according to histological subtype, being 31% for mesenchymal chondrosarcoma, 20.5% for dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma, 11.5% for conventional chondrosarcoma and 0% for clear-cell chondrosarcoma (P = 0.04). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 3–6.5]. Performance status (PS) ≥2, number of metastatic sites ≥1 and single-agent regimen were independently associated with poor PFS. Median overall survival (OS) was 18 months (95% CI 14.5–21.6). PS, number of metastatic sites and palliative surgery were independently associated with OS. Conventional chemotherapy have very limited efficacy in patients with advanced chondrosarcoma, the highest benefit being observed in mesenchymal and dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma. These data should be used as a reference for response and outcome in the assessment of investigational drugs in advanced chondrosarcoma.