Barbara Klaudia Klik

Dr. Barbara Klaudia Klik

Institute of Environmental Engineering, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications

Mariusz GusiatinMariusz Gusiatin
Mariusz Gusiatin
DKDorota Kulikowska
Dorota Kulikowska
Barbara Klaudia KlikBarbara Klaudia Klik
Barbara Klaudia Klik
Soil quality is seriously reduced due to chemical pollution, including heavy metal (HM) pollution. To meet quality standards, polluted soils must be remediated. Soil washing/soil flushing offers efficient removal of heavy metals and decreases environmental risk in polluted areas. These goals can be obtained by using proper washing agents to remove HMs from soil. These washing agents should not pose unacceptable threats to humans and ecosystems, including soil composition. Currently, it is desirable to use more environmentally and economically attractive washing agents instead of synthetic, environmentally problematic chemicals (e.g., ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)). The usefulness of novel washing agents for treatment of heavy metal-contaminated soils is being intensively developed, in terms of the efficiency of HM removal and properties of washed soils. Despite the unquestionable effectiveness of soil washing/flushing, it should be remembered that both methods generate secondary fluid waste (spent washing solution), and the final stage of the process should be treatment of the contaminated spent washing solution. This paper reviews information on soil contamination with heavy metals. This review examines the principles and status of soil washing and soil flushing. The novel contribution of this review is a presentation of the sources and characteristics of novel washing agents and chemical substitutes for EDTA, with their potential for heavy metal removal. Methods for treating spent washing solution are discussed separately.

1 August 2021 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Barbara Klaudia KlikBarbara Klaudia Klik
Barbara Klaudia Klik
ZGZygmunt M. Gusiatin
Zygmunt M. Gusiatin
DKDorota Kulikowska
Dorota Kulikowska

1 September 2017 in Journal of Hazardous Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Mariusz GusiatinMariusz Gusiatin
Mariusz Gusiatin
DKDorota Kulikowska
Dorota Kulikowska
Barbara Klaudia KlikBarbara Klaudia Klik
Barbara Klaudia Klik

25 November 2020 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Barbara Klaudia KlikBarbara Klaudia Klik
Barbara Klaudia Klik
ZGZygmunt M. Gusiatin
Zygmunt M. Gusiatin
DKDorota Kulikowska
Dorota Kulikowska
Remediation of soils contaminated with metal must ensure high efficiency of metals removal, reduce bioavailability of residual metals and decrease ecological risk. Thus, for comprehensive environmental soil quality assessment, different indices must be used. In this study, suitability of 8 indices was used for soil highly contaminated with Cu (7874.5 mg kg−1), moderately with Pb (1414.3 mg kg−1) and low with Zn (566.1 mg kg−1), washed in batch and dynamic conditions with both conventional and next-generation washing agents. The following indices were used: modified contamination factor (mCf), modified contamination factor degree (mCdeg), mobility factor (MF), reduced partition index (IR), potential ecological risk factor (Er,Z), modified potential ecological risk factor (Er,m), potential ecological risk index (RIZ) and modified ecological risk index (RIm). For mCf,mCdeg and IR own classification scale was proposed. It was proven that most useful indices for assessment of soil pollution with metals were mCf and mCdeg. The mCf together with the IR allow to simultaneous assessment of soil pollution and stability for individual metals. These indices were appropriate for soil contaminated with different concentrations of metals, washed under both hydrodynamic conditions using various washing agents and different effectiveness of metals removal. Thus, they may be considered as most useful for evaluation of remediation method, feasibility of washing agent and assessing soil quality after washing.

1 February 2019 in CATENA
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DKDorota Kulikowska
Dorota Kulikowska
Barbara Klaudia KlikBarbara Klaudia Klik
Barbara Klaudia Klik
Mariusz GusiatinMariusz Gusiatin
Mariusz Gusiatin
RJRafał Jabłoński
Rafał Jabłoński