Danuta Wasserman

Danuta Wasserman


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

37Years (1990-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2015 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DWDanuta Wasserman
Danuta Wasserman
CHChristina W Hoven
Christina W Hoven
CWCamilla Wasserman
Camilla Wasserman
MWMelanie Wall
Melanie Wall
RERuth Eisenberg
Ruth Eisenberg
VCVladimir Carli
Vladimir Carli

26 July 2012 in Addiction
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TDTony Durkee
Tony Durkee
MKMichael Kaess
Michael Kaess
VCVladimir Carli
Vladimir Carli
PPPeter Parzer
Peter Parzer
CWCamilla Wasserman
Camilla Wasserman
DWDanuta Wasserman
Danuta Wasserman

1 February 2012 in European Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DWDanuta Wasserman
Danuta Wasserman
ZRZ. Rihmer
Z. Rihmer
DRD. Rujescu
D. Rujescu
Marco SarchiaponeMarco Sarchiapone
Marco Sarchiapone
MSM. Sokolowski
M. Sokolowski
VCV. Carli
V. Carli
Suicide is a major public health problem in the WHO European Region accounting for over 150,000 deaths per year.Suicidal crisis: Acute intervention should start immediately in order to keep the patient alive.Diagnosis: An underlying psychiatric disorder is present in up to 90% of people who completed suicide. Comorbidity with depression, anxiety, substance abuse and personality disorders is high. In order to achieve successful prevention of suicidality, adequate diagnostic procedures and appropriate treatment for the underlying disorder are essential.Treatment: Existing evidence supports the efficacy of pharmacological treatment and cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) in preventing suicidal behaviour. Some other psychological treatments are promising, but the supporting evidence is currently insufficient. Studies show that antidepressant treatment decreases the risk for suicidality among depressed patients. However, the risk of suicidal behaviour in depressed patients treated with antidepressants exists during the first 10–14 days of treatment, which requires careful monitoring. Short-term supplementary medication with anxiolytics and hypnotics in the case of anxiety and insomnia is recommended. Treatment with antidepressants of children and adolescents should only be given under supervision of a specialist. Long-term treatment with lithium has been shown to be effective in preventing both suicide and attempted suicide in patients with unipolar and bipolar depression. Treatment with clozapine is effective in reducing suicidal behaviour in patients with schizophrenia. Other atypical antipsychotics are promising but more evidence is required.Treatment team: Multidisciplinary treatment teams including psychiatrist and other professionals such as psychologist, social worker, and occupational therapist are always preferable, as integration of pharmacological, psychological and social rehabilitation is recommended especially for patients with chronic suicidality.Family: The suicidal person independently of age should always be motivated to involve family in the treatment.Social support: Psychosocial treatment and support is recommended, as the majority of suicidal patients have problems with relationships, work, school and lack functioning social networks.Safety: A secure home, public and hospital environment, without access to suicidal means is a necessary strategy in suicide prevention. Each treatment option, prescription of medication and discharge of the patient from hospital should be carefully evaluated against the involved risks.Training of personnel: Training of general practitioners (GPs) is effective in the prevention of suicide. It improves treatment of depression and anxiety, quality of the provided care and attitudes towards suicide. Continuous training including discussions about ethical and legal issues is necessary for psychiatrists and other mental health professionals.

3 June 2014 in European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MKMichael Kaess
Michael Kaess
TDTony Durkee
Tony Durkee
RBRomuald Brunner
Romuald Brunner
VCVladimir Carli
Vladimir Carli
PPPeter Parzer
Peter Parzer
DWDanuta Wasserman
Danuta Wasserman
Rising global rates of pathological Internet use (PIU) and related psychological impairments have gained considerable attention in recent years. In an effort to acquire evidence-based knowledge of this relationship, the main objective of this study was to investigate the association between PIU, psychopathology and self-destructive behaviours among school-based adolescents in eleven European countries. This cross-sectional study was implemented within the framework of the European Union project: Saving and Empowering Young Lives in Europe. A representative sample of 11,356 school-based adolescents (M/F: 4,856/6,500; mean age: 14.9) was included in the analyses. PIU was assessed using the Young’s Diagnostic Questionnaire. Psychopathology was measured using the Beck Depression Inventory-II, Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale and Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Self-destructive behaviours were evaluated by the Deliberate Self-Harm Inventory and Paykel Suicide Scale. Results showed that suicidal behaviours (suicidal ideation and suicide attempts), depression, anxiety, conduct problems and hyperactivity/inattention were significant and independent predictors of PIU. The correlation between PIU, conduct problems and hyperactivity/inattention was stronger among females, while the link between PIU and symptoms of depression, anxiety and peer relationship problems was stronger among males. The association between PIU, psychopathology and self-destructive behaviours was stronger in countries with a higher prevalence of PIU and suicide rates. These findings ascertain that psychopathology and suicidal behaviours are strongly related to PIU. This association is significantly influenced by gender and country suggesting socio-cultural influences. At the clinical and public health levels, targeting PIU among adolescents in the early stages could potentially lead to improvements of psychological well-being and a reduction of suicidal behaviours.

1 March 2021 in Asia-Pacific Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DWDanuta Wasserman
Danuta Wasserman
VCVladimir Carli
Vladimir Carli
MIMiriam Iosue
Miriam Iosue
AJAfzal Javed
Afzal Javed
HHHelen Herrman
Helen Herrman
Introduction: Suicide is a global mental health problem for people of all ages. While rates of suicide in children and adolescents are reported as lower than those in older populations worldwide, they represent the third leading cause of death in 15–19‐year‐olds. The rates are higher among boys than girls worldwide, though the death rates for girls exceed those for boys in Bangladesh, China, India, and Nepal. There has been a general decrease in adolescent suicide rates over recent decades. However, increases are reported in South East Asia as well as South America over the same time period.Methods: A narrative review method has been used to summarize current knowledge about risk and protective factors for suicide among children and adolescents and to discuss evidence‐based strategy for suicide prevention in this age group.Results: Identified suicide risk and protective factors for children and adolescents largely overlap with those for adults. Nevertheless, developmental characteristics may strengthen the impact of some factors, such as decision‐making style, coping strategies, family and peer relationships, and victimization. The implementation of evidence‐based suicide preventive strategies is needed. Restricting access to lethal means, school‐based awareness and skill training programs, and interventions delivered in clinical and community settings have been proven effective. The effectiveness of gatekeeper training and screening programs in reducing suicidal ideation and behavior is unproven but widely examined in selected settings.Discussion: Since most studies have been conducted in western countries, future research should assess the effectiveness of these promising strategies in different cultural contexts. The use of more rigorous study designs, the use of both short‐ and long‐term follow‐up evaluations, the larger inclusion of individuals belonging to vulnerable groups, the evaluation of online intervention, and the analysis of programs' cost‐effectiveness are also required.

TDTony Durkee
Tony Durkee
VCVladimir Carli
Vladimir Carli
BFBirgitta Floderus
Birgitta Floderus
CWCamilla Wasserman
Camilla Wasserman
Marco SarchiaponeMarco Sarchiapone
Marco Sarchiapone
DWDanuta Wasserman
Danuta Wasserman
Risk-behaviors are a major contributor to the leading causes of morbidity among adolescents and young people; however, their association with pathological Internet use (PIU) is relatively unexplored, particularly within the European context. The main objective of this study is to investigate the association between risk-behaviors and PIU in European adolescents. This cross-sectional study was conducted within the framework of the FP7 European Union project: Saving and Empowering Young Lives in Europe (SEYLE). Data on adolescents were collected from randomized schools within study sites across eleven European countries. PIU was measured using Young’s Diagnostic Questionnaire (YDQ). Risk-behaviors were assessed using questions procured from the Global School-Based Student Health Survey (GSHS). A total of 11,931 adolescents were included in the analyses: 43.4% male and 56.6% female (M/F: 5179/6752), with a mean age of 14.89 ± 0.87 years. Adolescents reporting poor sleeping habits and risk-taking actions showed the strongest associations with PIU, followed by tobacco use, poor nutrition and physical inactivity. Among adolescents in the PIU group, 89.9% were characterized as having multiple risk-behaviors. The significant association observed between PIU and risk-behaviors, combined with a high rate of co-occurrence, underlines the importance of considering PIU when screening, treating or preventing high-risk behaviors among adolescents.