Gustavo Turecki

Prof. Dr. Gustavo Turecki

Department of Psychiatry, McGill University/ Douglas Mental Health Institute, Frank B. Common Pavilion, F-2101, 6875 LaSalle Boulevard Montreal, Quebec H4H 1R3, Canada
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

38Years (1989-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 February 2009 in Nature Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PMPatrick O McGowan
Patrick O McGowan
ASAya Sasaki
Aya Sasaki
ADAna C D'Alessio
Ana C D'Alessio
SDSergiy Dymov
Sergiy Dymov
BLBenoit Labonté
Benoit Labonté
MMMichael J Meaney
Michael J Meaney

1 March 2016 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GTGustavo Turecki
Gustavo Turecki
DBDavid A Brent
David A Brent

8 July 2010 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AMAlika K. Maunakea
Alika K. Maunakea
RNRaman P. Nagarajan
Raman P. Nagarajan
MBMikhail Bilenky
Mikhail Bilenky
TBTracy J. Ballinger
Tracy J. Ballinger
CDCletus D’souza
Cletus D’souza
JCJoseph F. Costello
Joseph F. Costello
DNA methylation plays an important role in the maintenance of cell identity through its effect on gene expression. Methylation of 5′ promoters is known to suppress gene expression, while the role of intragenic DNA methylation — where methylation occurs within the body of a gene itself — has been less extensively studied and remains controversial. A map of DNA methylation from the human brain has now been constructed with unprecedented coverage using next-generation sequencing. Integration of this map with brain tissue ChIP-sequencing for histone methylation, and gene expression in mouse and human, highlights a major role for intragenic methylation in regulating tissue-specific promoters in gene bodies, and a surprisingly minor role in 5′ promoters. The methylation of DNA in 5′ promoter regions suppresses gene expression, but what is the role of DNA methylation in the bodies of genes? Here, a map of DNA methylation is generated from human brain tissue; it is found that most methylated CpG islands are within intragenic and intergenic regions, rather than within promoters. It is proposed that intragenic methylation regulates the expression of alternative gene transcripts in different tissues and cell types. Although it is known that the methylation of DNA in 5′ promoters suppresses gene expression, the role of DNA methylation in gene bodies is unclear1,2,3,4,5. In mammals, tissue- and cell type-specific methylation is present in a small percentage of 5′ CpG island (CGI) promoters, whereas a far greater proportion occurs across gene bodies, coinciding with highly conserved sequences5,6,7,8,9,10. Tissue-specific intragenic methylation might reduce3, or, paradoxically, enhance transcription elongation efficiency1,2,4,5. Capped analysis of gene expression (CAGE) experiments also indicate that transcription commonly initiates within and between genes11,12,13,14,15. To investigate the role of intragenic methylation, we generated a map of DNA methylation from the human brain encompassing 24.7 million of the 28 million CpG sites. From the dense, high-resolution coverage of CpG islands, the majority of methylated CpG islands were shown to be in intragenic and intergenic regions, whereas less than 3% of CpG islands in 5′ promoters were methylated. The CpG islands in all three locations overlapped with RNA markers of transcription initiation, and unmethylated CpG islands also overlapped significantly with trimethylation of H3K4, a histone modification enriched at promoters16. The general and CpG-island-specific patterns of methylation are conserved in mouse tissues. An in-depth investigation of the human SHANK3 locus17,18 and its mouse homologue demonstrated that this tissue-specific DNA methylation regulates intragenic promoter activity in vitro and in vivo. These methylation-regulated, alternative transcripts are expressed in a tissue- and cell type-specific manner, and are expressed differentially within a single cell type from distinct brain regions. These results support a major role for intragenic methylation in regulating cell context-specific alternative promoters in gene bodies.

1 May 2019 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ECeQTLGen Consortium
eQTLGen Consortium
ESEli A. Stahl
Eli A. Stahl
BCBIOS Consortium
BIOS Consortium
TCthe Bipolar Disorder Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium
the Bipolar Disorder Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium
GBGerome Breen
Gerome Breen
PSPamela Sklar
Pamela Sklar
Bipolar disorder is a highly heritable psychiatric disorder. We performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) including 20,352 cases and 31,358 controls of European descent, with follow-up analysis of 822 variants with P < 1 × 10−4 in an additional 9,412 cases and 137,760 controls. Eight of the 19 variants that were genome-wide significant (P < 5 × 10−8) in the discovery GWAS were not genome-wide significant in the combined analysis, consistent with small effect sizes and limited power but also with genetic heterogeneity. In the combined analysis, 30 loci were genome-wide significant, including 20 newly identified loci. The significant loci contain genes encoding ion channels, neurotransmitter transporters and synaptic components. Pathway analysis revealed nine significantly enriched gene sets, including regulation of insulin secretion and endocannabinoid signaling. Bipolar I disorder is strongly genetically correlated with schizophrenia, driven by psychosis, whereas bipolar II disorder is more strongly correlated with major depressive disorder. These findings address key clinical questions and provide potential biological mechanisms for bipolar disorder.

22 June 2018 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TCThe Brainstorm Consortium
The Brainstorm Consortium
VAVerneri Anttila
Verneri Anttila
BBBrendan Bulik-Sullivan
Brendan Bulik-Sullivan
HFHilary K. Finucane
Hilary K. Finucane
RWRaymond K. Walters
Raymond K. Walters
BNBenjamin M. Neale
Benjamin M. Neale
Brainstorming diseases: Consistent classification of neuropsychiatric diseases is problematic because it can lead to misunderstanding of etiology. The Brainstorm Consortium examined multiple genome-wide association studies drawn from more than 200,000 patients for 25 brain-associated disorders and 17 phenotypes. Broadly, it appears that psychiatric and neurologic disorders share relatively little common genetic risk. However, different and independent pathways can result in similar clinical manifestations (e.g., psychosis, which occurs in both schizophrenia and Alzheimer's disease). Schizophrenia correlated with many psychiatric disorders, whereas the immunopathological affliction Crohn's disease did not, and posttraumatic stress syndrome was also largely independent of underlying traits. Essentially, the earlier the onset of a disorder, the more inheritable it appeared to be. Science , this issue p. eaap8757

24 October 2019 in Nature Reviews Disease Primers
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GTGustavo Turecki
Gustavo Turecki
DBDavid A. Brent
David A. Brent
DGDavid Gunnell
David Gunnell
RORory C. O’connor
Rory C. O’connor
MOMaria A. Oquendo
Maria A. Oquendo
BSBarbara H. Stanley
Barbara H. Stanley