Eduardo Nobile-Orazio

Eduardo Nobile-Orazio


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

46Years (1981-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 February 2010 in European Journal of Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PBP. Y. K. Van Den Bergh
P. Y. K. Van Den Bergh
RHR. D. M. Hadden
R. D. M. Hadden
PBP. Bouche
P. Bouche
DCD. R. Cornblath
D. R. Cornblath
AHA. Hahn
A. Hahn
ISI. N. Van Schaik
I. N. Van Schaik
Background:  Consensus guidelines on the definition, investigation, and treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) have been previously published in European Journal of Neurology and Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System.Objectives:  To revise these guidelines.Methods:  Disease experts, including a representative of patients, considered references retrieved from MEDLINE and Cochrane Systematic Reviews published between August 2004 and July 2009 and prepared statements that were agreed in an iterative fashion.Recommendations:  The Task Force agreed on Good Practice Points to define clinical and electrophysiological diagnostic criteria for CIDP with or without concomitant diseases and investigations to be considered. The principal treatment recommendations were: (i) intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) (Recommendation Level A) or corticosteroids (Recommendation Level C) should be considered in sensory and motor CIDP; (ii) IVIg should be considered as the initial treatment in pure motor CIDP (Good Practice Point); (iii) if IVIg and corticosteroids are ineffective, plasma exchange (PE) should be considered (Recommendation Level A); (iv) if the response is inadequate or the maintenance doses of the initial treatment are high, combination treatments or adding an immunosuppressant or immunomodulatory drug should be considered (Good Practice Point); (v) symptomatic treatment and multidisciplinary management should be considered (Good Practice Point).


30 July 2001 in Annals of Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RHRichard Hughes
Richard Hughes
SBSiân Bensa
Siân Bensa
HWHugh Willison
Hugh Willison
PBPeter Van Den Bergh
Peter Van Den Bergh
GCGiancarlo Comi
Giancarlo Comi
IGInflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) Group
Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) Group

10 October 2023 in European Journal of Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDPieter A. van Doorn
Pieter A. van Doorn
PBPeter Y. K. Van Den Bergh
Peter Y. K. Van Den Bergh
RHRobert D. M. Hadden
Robert D. M. Hadden
BABert Avau
Bert Avau
PVPatrick Vankrunkelsven
Patrick Vankrunkelsven
HWHugh Willison
Hugh Willison
Guillain–Barré syndrome (GBS) is an acute polyradiculoneuropathy. Symptoms may vary greatly in presentation and severity. Besides weakness and sensory disturbances, patients may have cranial nerve involvement, respiratory insufficiency, autonomic dysfunction and pain. To develop an evidence‐based guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of GBS, using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology a Task Force (TF) of the European Academy of Neurology (EAN) and the Peripheral Nerve Society (PNS) constructed 14 Population/Intervention/Comparison/Outcome questions (PICOs) covering diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of GBS, which guided the literature search. Data were extracted and summarised in GRADE Summaries of Findings (for treatment PICOs) or Evidence Tables (for diagnostic and prognostic PICOs). Statements were prepared according to GRADE Evidence‐to‐Decision (EtD) frameworks. For the six intervention PICOs, evidence‐based recommendations are made. For other PICOs, good practice points (GPPs) are formulated. For diagnosis, the principal GPPs are: GBS is more likely if there is a history of recent diarrhoea or respiratory infection; CSF examination is valuable, particularly when the diagnosis is less certain; electrodiagnostic testing is advised to support the diagnosis; testing for anti‐ganglioside antibodies is of limited clinical value in most patients with typical motor‐sensory GBS, but anti‐GQ1b antibody testing should be considered when Miller Fisher syndrome (MFS) is suspected; nodal–paranodal antibodies should be tested when autoimmune nodopathy is suspected; MRI or ultrasound imaging should be considered in atypical cases; and changing the diagnosis to acute‐onset chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (A‐CIDP) should be considered if progression continues after 8 weeks from onset, which occurs in around 5% of patients initially diagnosed with GBS. For treatment, the TF recommends intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) 0.4 g/kg for 5 days, in patients within 2 weeks (GPP also within 2–4 weeks) after onset of weakness if unable to walk unaided, or a course of plasma exchange (PE) 12–15 L in four to five exchanges over 1–2 weeks, in patients within 4 weeks after onset of weakness if unable to walk unaided. The TF recommends against a second IVIg course in GBS patients with a poor prognosis; recommends against using oral corticosteroids, and weakly recommends against using IV corticosteroids; does not recommend PE followed immediately by IVIg; weakly recommends gabapentinoids, tricyclic antidepressants or carbamazepine for treatment of pain; does not recommend a specific treatment for fatigue. To estimate the prognosis of individual patients, the TF advises using the modified Erasmus GBS outcome score (mEGOS) to assess outcome, and the modified Erasmus GBS Respiratory Insufficiency Score (mEGRIS) to assess the risk of requiring artificial ventilation. Based on the PICOs, available literature and additional discussions, we provide flow charts to assist making clinical decisions on diagnosis, treatment and the need for intensive care unit admission.

1 September 1994 in Annals of Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ENEduardo Nobile-Orazio
Eduardo Nobile-Orazio
EME. Manfredini
E. Manfredini
MCM. Carpo
M. Carpo
NMN. Meucci
N. Meucci
SMSalvatore Monaco
Salvatore Monaco
GSG. Scarlato
G. Scarlato

21 April 2006 in European Journal of Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RHR. A. C. Hughes
R. A. C. Hughes
PBP. Bouche
P. Bouche
DCD. R. Cornblath
D. R. Cornblath
EEE. Evers
E. Evers
RHR. D. M. Hadden
R. D. M. Hadden
ISI. N. Van Schaik
I. N. Van Schaik
Numerous sets of diagnostic criteria have sought to define chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and randomized trials and systematic reviews of treatment have been published. The objective is to prepare consensus guidelines on the definition, investigation and treatment of CIDP. Disease experts and a patient representative considered references retrieved from MEDLINE and Cochrane Systematic Reviews in May 2004 and prepared statements which were agreed in an iterative fashion. The Task Force agreed on good practice points to define clinical and electrophysiological diagnostic criteria for CIDP with or without concomitant diseases and investigations to be considered. The principal treatment recommendations were: (1) intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) or corticosteroids should be considered in sensory and motor CIDP (level B recommendation); (2) IVIg should be considered as the initial treatment in pure motor CIDP (Good Practice Point); (3) if IVIg and corticosteroids are ineffective plasma exchange (PE) should be considered (level A recommendation); (4) If the response is inadequate or the maintenance doses of the initial treatment are high, combination treatments or adding an immunosuppressant or immunomodulatory drug should be considered (Good Practice Point); (5) Symptomatic treatment and multidisciplinary management should be considered (Good Practice Point).