Douglas A. Burns

Dr. Douglas A. Burns

United States Geological Survey, Reston, United States

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

46Years (1981-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
31 March 2010 in Jawra Journal of the American Water Resources Association
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PVPhilippe Vidon
Philippe Vidon
CACraig Allan
Craig Allan
DBDouglas A. Burns
Douglas A. Burns
TDTim P. Duval
Tim P. Duval
NGNoel Gurwick
Noel Gurwick
SSStephen D Sebestyen
Stephen D Sebestyen

1 June 2007 in Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GLGary M. Lovett
Gary M. Lovett
DBDouglas A. Burns
Douglas A. Burns
CDCharles T. Driscoll
Charles T. Driscoll
JJJennifer C. Jenkins
Jennifer C. Jenkins
MMMyron J. Mitchell
Myron J. Mitchell
RHRichard Haeuber
Richard Haeuber
Environmental monitoring is often criticized as being unscientific, too expensive, and wasteful. While some monitoring studies do suffer from these problems, there are also many highly successful long‐term monitoring programs that have provided important scientific advances and crucial information for environmental policy. Here, we discuss the characteristics of effective monitoring programs, and contend that monitoring should be considered a fundamental component of environmental science and policy. We urge scientists who develop monitoring programs to plan in advance to ensure high data quality, accessibility, and cost‐effectiveness, and we urge government agencies and other funding institutions to make greater commitments to increasing the amount and long‐term stability of funding for environmental monitoring programs.

4 December 2002 in Water Resources Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JFJim Freer
Jim Freer
JMJeffrey McDonnell
Jeffrey McDonnell
KBK. J. Beven
K. J. Beven
NPN. E. Peters
N. E. Peters
DBDouglas A. Burns
Douglas A. Burns
CKC. Kendall
C. Kendall
We conducted a detailed study of subsurface flow and water table response coupled with digital terrain analysis (DTA) of surface and subsurface features at the hillslope scale in Panola Mountain Research Watershed (PMRW), Georgia. Subsurface storm flow contributions of macropore and matrix flow in different sections along an artificial trench face were highly variable in terms of timing, peak flow, recession characteristics, and total flow volume. The trench flow characteristics showed linkages with the spatial tensiometer response defining water table development upslope. DTA of the ground surface did not capture the observed spatial patterns of trench flow or tensiometric response. However, bedrock surface topographic indices significantly improved the estimation of spatial variation of flow at the trench. Point‐scale tensiometric data were also more highly correlated with the bedrock surface‐based indices. These relationships were further assessed for temporal changes throughout a rainstorm. Linkages between the bedrock indices and the trench flow and spatial water table responses improved during the wetter periods of the rainstorm, when the hillslope became more hydrologically connected. Our results clearly demonstrate that in developing a conceptual framework for understanding the mechanisms of runoff generation, local bedrock topography may be highly significant at the hillslope scale in some catchments where the bedrock surface acts as a relatively impermeable boundary.

11 July 2001 in Hydrological Processes
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DBDouglas A. Burns
Douglas A. Burns
JMJeffrey McDonnell
Jeffrey McDonnell
RHRichard P. Hooper
Richard P. Hooper
NPNorman E. Peters
Norman E. Peters
JFJames E. Freer
James E. Freer
KBKeith Beven
Keith Beven

20 October 2007 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EEE. M. Elliott
E. M. Elliott
CKC. Kendall
C. Kendall
SWS. D. Wankel
S. D. Wankel
DBDouglas A. Burns
Douglas A. Burns
EBElizabeth W. Boyer
Elizabeth W. Boyer
TBT. J. Butler
T. J. Butler

1 August 2015 in Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ICIrena Creed
Irena Creed
DMDiane M. McKnight
Diane M. McKnight
BPBrian A. Pellerin
Brian A. Pellerin
MGMark B. Green
Mark B. Green
BBBrian Bergamaschi
Brian Bergamaschi
SSSarah M. Stackpoole
Sarah M. Stackpoole
A better understanding is needed of how hydrological and biogeochemical processes control dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations and dissolved organic matter (DOM) composition from headwaters downstream to large rivers. We examined a large DOM dataset from the National Water Information System of the US Geological Survey, which represents approximately 100 000 measurements of DOC concentration and DOM composition at many sites along rivers across the United States. Application of quantile regression revealed a tendency towards downstream spatial and temporal homogenization of DOC concentrations and a shift from dominance of aromatic DOM in headwaters to more aliphatic DOM downstream. The DOC concentration–discharge (C-Q) relationships at each site revealed a downstream tendency towards a slope of zero. We propose that despite complexities in river networks that have driven many revisions to the River Continuum Concept, rivers show a tendency towards chemostasis (C-Q slope of zero) because of a downstream shift from a dominance of hydrologic drivers that connect terrestrial DOM sources to streams in the headwaters towards a dominance of instream and near-stream biogeochemical processes that result in preferential losses of aromatic DOM and preferential gains of aliphatic DOM.