Peter Webley

Dr. Peter Webley

Geophysical Institute, 903 Koyukuk Drive, University of Alaska Fairbanks, AK 99775-7320, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2009 in Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LML.G. Mastin
L.G. Mastin
MGM. Guffanti
M. Guffanti
RSR. Servranckx
R. Servranckx
Peter WebleyPeter Webley
Peter Webley
SBS. Barsotti
S. Barsotti
CWC.F. Waythomas
C.F. Waythomas

5 October 2010 in Geophysical Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RHRoberta C. Hamme
Roberta C. Hamme
Peter WebleyPeter Webley
Peter Webley
WCWilliam R. Crawford
William R. Crawford
FWFrank A. Whitney
Frank A. Whitney
MDMichael David DeGrandpre
Michael David DeGrandpre
DLDeirdre Lockwood
Deirdre Lockwood

3 October 2002 in Geophysical Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GWG. Wadge
G. Wadge
Peter WebleyPeter Webley
Peter Webley
IJI. N. James
I. N. James
RBR. Bingley
R. Bingley
ADA. Dodson
A. Dodson
PCPeter Clarke
Peter Clarke
Dynamic models of atmospheric movement over the Mount Etna volcano are used to calculate the path delays affecting radar caused by variable water vapour in the troposphere. We compare these model results with the equivalent differential radar interferogram generated by two ERS‐2 SAR images taken 35 days apart and the water vapour delay retrievals from a network of fourteen GPS stations distributed over the volcano. The atmospheric model delay field agrees well with the long‐wavelength spatial differences measured by InSAR and those measured by GPS.

1 June 2013 in Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
TLTaryn Lopez
Taryn Lopez
SCSimon Carn
Simon Carn
CWCynthia Werner
Cynthia Werner
DFDavid Fee
David Fee
PKPeter Kelly
Peter Kelly
DSDavid Schneider
David Schneider
The 2009 eruption of Redoubt Volcano, Alaska, provided a rare opportunity to compare satellite measurements of sulfur dioxide (SO2) by the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) with airborne SO2 measurements by the Alaska Volcano Observatory (AVO). Herein we: (1) compare OMI and airborne SO2 column density values for Redoubt's tropospheric plume, (2) calculate daily SO2 masses from Mount Redoubt for the first three months of the eruption, (3) develop simple methods to convert daily measured SO2 masses into emission rates to allow satellite data to be directly integrated with the airborne SO2 emissions dataset, (4) calculate cumulative SO2 emissions from the eruption, and (5) evaluate OMI as a monitoring tool for high-latitude degassing volcanoes. A linear correlation (R2~0.75) is observed between OMI and airborne SO2 column densities. OMI daily SO2 masses for the sample period ranged from ~60.1kt on 24 March to below detection limit, with an average daily SO2 mass of ~6.7kt. The highest SO2 emissions were observed during the initial part of the explosive phase and the emissions exhibited an overall decreasing trend with time. OMI SO2 emission rates were derived using three methods and compared to airborne measurements. This comparison yields a linear correlation (R2~0.82) with OMI-derived emission rates consistently lower than airborne measurements. The comparison results suggest that OMI's detection limit for high latitude, springtime conditions varies from ~2000 to 4000t/d. Cumulative SO2 masses calculated from daily OMI data for the sample period are estimated to range from 542 to 615kt, with approximately half of this SO2 produced during the explosive phase of the eruption. These cumulative masses are similar in magnitude to those estimated for the 1989–90 Redoubt eruption. Strong correlations between daily OMI SO2 mass and both tephra mass and acoustic energy during the explosive phase of the eruption suggest that OMI data may be used to infer relative eruption size and explosivity. Further, when used in conjunction with complementary datasets, OMI daily SO2 masses may be used to help distinguish explosive from effusive activity and identify changes in lava extrusion rates. The results of this study suggest that OMI is a useful volcano monitoring tool to complement airborne measurements, capture explosive SO2 emissions, and provide high temporal resolution SO2 emissions data that can be used with interdisciplinary datasets to illuminate volcanic processes

1 January 2002 in Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Peter WebleyPeter Webley
Peter Webley
RBR.M. Bingley
R.M. Bingley
ADA.H. Dodson
A.H. Dodson
GWG. Wadge
G. Wadge
SWS.J. Waugh
S.J. Waugh
IJI.N. James
I.N. James

19 May 2009 in Eos
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JLJessica Larsen
Jessica Larsen
CNChristina Neal
Christina Neal
Peter WebleyPeter Webley
Peter Webley
JFJeff Freymueller
Jeff Freymueller
MHMatthew Haney
Matthew Haney
RWRick Wessels
Rick Wessels