Gijs de Boer

Gijs de Boer


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
11 December 2011 in Nature Geoscience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HMHugh Morrison
Hugh Morrison
GBGijs de Boer
Gijs de Boer
GFGraham Feingold
Graham Feingold
JHJerry Harrington
Jerry Harrington
MSMatthew D. Shupe
Matthew D. Shupe
KSKara Sulia
Kara Sulia

7 February 2022 in Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MSMatthew D. Shupe
Matthew D. Shupe
MRMarkus Rex
Markus Rex
BBByron Blomquist
Byron Blomquist
PPP. Ola G. Persson
P. Ola G. Persson
JSJulia Schmale
Julia Schmale
FYFange Yue
Fange Yue
With the Arctic rapidly changing, the needs to observe, understand, and model the changes are essential. To support these needs, an annual cycle of observations of atmospheric properties, processes, and interactions were made while drifting with the sea ice across the central Arctic during the Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) expedition from October 2019 to September 2020. An international team designed and implemented the comprehensive program to document and characterize all aspects of the Arctic atmospheric system in unprecedented detail, using a variety of approaches, and across multiple scales. These measurements were coordinated with other observational teams to explore cross-cutting and coupled interactions with the Arctic Ocean, sea ice, and ecosystem through a variety of physical and biogeochemical processes. This overview outlines the breadth and complexity of the atmospheric research program, which was organized into 4 subgroups: atmospheric state, clouds and precipitation, gases and aerosols, and energy budgets. Atmospheric variability over the annual cycle revealed important influences from a persistent large-scale winter circulation pattern, leading to some storms with pressure and winds that were outside the interquartile range of past conditions suggested by long-term reanalysis. Similarly, the MOSAiC location was warmer and wetter in summer than the reanalysis climatology, in part due to its close proximity to the sea ice edge. The comprehensiveness of the observational program for characterizing and analyzing atmospheric phenomena is demonstrated via a winter case study examining air mass transitions and a summer case study examining vertical atmospheric evolution. Overall, the MOSAiC atmospheric program successfully met its objectives and was the most comprehensive atmospheric measurement program to date conducted over the Arctic sea ice. The obtained data will support a broad range of coupled-system scientific research and provide an important foundation for advancing multiscale modeling capabilities in the Arctic.

7 February 2022 in Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MNMarcel Nicolaus
Marcel Nicolaus
DPDonald K. Perovich
Donald K. Perovich
GSGunnar Spreen
Gunnar Spreen
MGMats A. Granskog
Mats A. Granskog
LALuisa von Albedyll
Luisa von Albedyll
MWManfred Wendisch
Manfred Wendisch
Year-round observations of the physical snow and ice properties and processes that govern the ice pack evolution and its interaction with the atmosphere and the ocean were conducted during the Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) expedition of the research vessel Polarstern in the Arctic Ocean from October 2019 to September 2020. This work was embedded into the interdisciplinary design of the 5 MOSAiC teams, studying the atmosphere, the sea ice, the ocean, the ecosystem, and biogeochemical processes. The overall aim of the snow and sea ice observations during MOSAiC was to characterize the physical properties of the snow and ice cover comprehensively in the central Arctic over an entire annual cycle. This objective was achieved by detailed observations of physical properties and of energy and mass balance of snow and ice. By studying snow and sea ice dynamics over nested spatial scales from centimeters to tens of kilometers, the variability across scales can be considered. On-ice observations of in situ and remote sensing properties of the different surface types over all seasons will help to improve numerical process and climate models and to establish and validate novel satellite remote sensing methods; the linkages to accompanying airborne measurements, satellite observations, and results of numerical models are discussed. We found large spatial variabilities of snow metamorphism and thermal regimes impacting sea ice growth. We conclude that the highly variable snow cover needs to be considered in more detail (in observations, remote sensing, and models) to better understand snow-related feedback processes. The ice pack revealed rapid transformations and motions along the drift in all seasons. The number of coupled ice–ocean interface processes observed in detail are expected to guide upcoming research with respect to the changing Arctic sea ice.

1 April 2009 in Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SKStephen A. Klein
Stephen A. Klein
RMRenata B. McCoy
Renata B. McCoy
HMHugh Morrison
Hugh Morrison
AAAndrew S. Ackerman
Andrew S. Ackerman
AAAlexander Avramov
Alexander Avramov
GZGong Zhang
Gong Zhang
Results are presented from an intercomparison of single‐column and cloud‐resolving model simulations of a cold‐air outbreak mixed‐phase stratocumulus cloud observed during the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) programme's Mixed‐Phase Arctic Cloud Experiment. The observed cloud occurred in a well‐mixed boundary layer with a cloud‐top temperature of − 15 °C. The average liquid water path of around 160 g m−2was about two‐thirds of the adiabatic value and far greater than the average mass of ice which when integrated from the surface to cloud top was around 15 g m−2.Simulations of 17 single‐column models (SCMs) and 9 cloud‐resolving models (CRMs) are compared. While the simulated ice water path is generally consistent with observed values, the median SCM and CRM liquid water path is a factor‐of‐three smaller than observed. Results from a sensitivity study in which models removed ice microphysics suggest that in many models the interaction between liquid and ice‐phase microphysics is responsible for the large model underestimate of liquid water path.Despite this underestimate, the simulated liquid and ice water paths of several models are consistent with observed values. Furthermore, models with more sophisticated microphysics simulate liquid and ice water paths that are in better agreement with the observed values, although considerable scatter exists. Although no single factor guarantees a good simulation, these results emphasize the need for improvement in the model representation of mixed‐phase microphysics. Copyright © 2009 Royal Meteorological Society

19 October 2012 in Geophysical Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GCG. Cesana
G. Cesana
JKJ. E. Kay
J. E. Kay
HCH. Chepfer
H. Chepfer
JEJ. M. English
J. M. English
GBGijs de Boer
Gijs de Boer

6 January 2011 in Geophysical Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GBGijs de Boer
Gijs de Boer
HMH. Morrison
H. Morrison
MSM. D. Shupe
M. D. Shupe
RHR. Hildner
R. Hildner