Nicola Masini

Prof. Dr. Nicola Masini

CNR-ISPC
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2019 in Remote Sensing of Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LLLei Luo
Lei Luo
XWXinyuan Wang
Xinyuan Wang
HGHuadong Guo
Huadong Guo
Rosa LasaponaraRosa Lasaponara
Rosa Lasaponara
XZXin Zong
Xin Zong
YYYa Yao
Ya Yao

1 February 2007 in Journal of Archaeological Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Rosa LasaponaraRosa Lasaponara
Rosa Lasaponara
Nicola MasiniNicola Masini
Nicola Masini

1 September 2011 in Journal of Archaeological Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Rosa LasaponaraRosa Lasaponara
Rosa Lasaponara
Nicola MasiniNicola Masini
Nicola Masini


28 September 2018 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LLLei Luo
Lei Luo
XWXinyuan Wang
Xinyuan Wang
HGHuadong Guo
Huadong Guo
Rosa LasaponaraRosa Lasaponara
Rosa Lasaponara
PSPilong SHI
Pilong SHI
NHNingke Hu
Ningke Hu
Google Earth (GE), a large Earth-observation data-based geographical information computer application, is an intuitive three-dimensional virtual globe. It enables archaeologists around the world to communicate and share their multisource data and research findings. Different from traditional geographical information systems (GIS), GE is free and easy to use in data collection, exploration, and visualization. In the past decade, many peer-reviewed articles on the use of GE in the archaeological cultural heritage (ACH) research field have been published. Most of these concern specific ACH investigations with a wide spatial coverage. GE can often be used to survey and document ACH so that both skilled archaeologists and the public can more easily and intuitively understand the results. Based on geographical tools and multi-temporal very high-resolution (VHR) satellite imagery, GE has been shown to provide spatio-temporal change information that has a bearing on the physical, environmental, and geographical character of ACH. In this review, in order to discuss the huge potential of GE, a comprehensive review of GE and its applications to ACH in the published scientific literature is first presented; case studies in five main research fields demonstrating how GE can be deployed as a key tool for studying ACH are then described. The selected case studies illustrate how GE can be used effectively to investigate ACH at multiple scales, discover new archaeological sites in remote regions, monitor historical sites, and assess damage in areas of conflict, and promote virtual tourism. These examples form the basis for highlighting current trends in remote sensing archaeology based on the GE platform, which could provide access to a low-cost and easy-to-use tool for communicating and sharing ACH geospatial data more effectively to the general public in the era of Digital Earth. Finally, a discussion of the merits and limitations of GE is presented along with conclusions and remaining challenges.

15 December 2014 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Francesca CignaFrancesca Cigna
Francesca Cigna
Rosa LasaponaraRosa Lasaponara
Rosa Lasaponara
Nicola MasiniNicola Masini
Nicola Masini
Pietro MililloPietro Milillo
Pietro Milillo
Deodato TapeteDeodato Tapete
Deodato Tapete
We processed X-band COSMO-SkyMed 3-m resolution StripMap HIMAGE time series (March 2011–June 2013) with the Stanford Method for Persistent Scatterers (StaMPS), to retrieve an updated picture of the condition and structural health of the historic centre of Rome, Italy, and neighbouring quarters. Taking advantage of an average target density of over 2800 PS/km2, we analysed the spatial distribution of more than 310,000 radar targets against: (1) land cover; (2) the location of archaeological ruins and restoration activities; and (3) the size, orientation and morphology of historical buildings. Radar interpretation was addressed from the perspective of conservators, and the deformation estimates were correlated to local geohazards and triggering factors of structural collapse. In the context of overall stability, deformation was identified at the single-monument scale, e.g., for the Roman cistern and exedra in the Oppian Hill. Comparative assessment against InSAR processing of C-band imagery (1992–2010) published in the literature confirms the persistence of ground motions affecting monuments and subsidence in southern residential quarters adjacent to the Tiber River, due to the consolidation of compressible deposits. Vertical velocity estimated from COSMO-SkyMed PS exceeds −7.0 mm/y in areas of recent urbanization.