Tatiana N. Tikhomirova

Dr. Tatiana N. Tikhomirova

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 October 2020 in Behavioral Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TTTatiana N. Tikhomirova
Tatiana N. Tikhomirova
AMArtem Malykh
Artem Malykh
SMSergey Malykh
Sergey Malykh
The relationship between cognitive abilities and academic achievement across schooling from the first to the eleventh grade was analyzed. Information processing speed, visuospatial working memory, number sense, and fluid intelligence were considered predictors of general academic achievement, which was derived from grades in mathematics, language, and biology. This cross-sectional study involved 1560 pupils who were in grades 1–11 at general education schools and were aged from 6.8 to 19.1 years (50.4% were boys). Information processing speed, visuospatial working memory, and number sense were measured using the Choice Reaction Time, Corsi Block-Tapping, and Number Sense computerized tests, respectively. Fluid intelligence was measured using the paper-and-pencil version of the Standard Progressive Matrices test. Correlation analysis and structural equation modeling were carried out. It was shown that it is possible to describe the structure of the relationship between cognitive abilities and academic achievement for all levels of schooling with a single model. In this model, information processing speed is the key predictor of fluid intelligence, working memory, and number sense, which in turn contribute to individual differences in academic success. Additionally, the specificity of the relationship between individual indicators of cognitive abilities and academic achievement at each level of schooling was revealed.

27 June 2014 in Developmental Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MRMaja Rodic
Maja Rodic
XZXinlin Zhou
Xinlin Zhou
TTTatiana N. Tikhomirova
Tatiana N. Tikhomirova
WWWei Wei
Wei Wei
SMSergey Malykh
Sergey Malykh
Yulia KovasYulia Kovas
Yulia Kovas

1 July 2015 in Personality and Individual Differences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Yulia KovasYulia Kovas
Yulia Kovas
GGGabrielle Garon-Carrier
Gabrielle Garon-Carrier
MBMichel Boivin
Michel Boivin
SPStephen A. Petrill
Stephen A. Petrill
RPRobert Plomin
Robert Plomin
FVFrank Vitaro
Frank Vitaro
• Genes rather than environment contribute to family resemblance in academic motivation. • Environmental influences stemmed entirely from individual specific experiences. • Attending same vs. different classes did not affect twin similarity in motivation. • Results are similar across ages, countries and academic subjects.

1 March 2014 in Intelligence
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MTM.G. Tosto
M.G. Tosto
SPS.A. Petrill
S.A. Petrill
JHJ. Halberda
J. Halberda
MTM. Trzaskowski
M. Trzaskowski
TTTatiana N. Tikhomirova
Tatiana N. Tikhomirova
Yulia KovasYulia Kovas
Yulia Kovas
Basic intellectual abilities of quantity and numerosity estimation have been detected across animal species. Such abilities are referred to as ‘number sense’. For human species, individual differences in number sense are detectable early in life, persist in later development, and relate to general intelligence. The origins of these individual differences are unknown. To address this question, we conducted the first large-scale genetically sensitive investigation of number sense, assessing numerosity discrimination abilities in 837 pairs of monozygotic and 1422 pairs of dizygotic 16-year-old twin pairs. Univariate genetic analysis of the twin data revealed that number sense is modestly heritable (32%), with individual differences being largely explained by non-shared environmental influences (68%) and no contribution from shared environmental factors. Sex-Limitation model fitting revealed no differences between males and females in the etiology of individual differences in number sense abilities. We also carried out Genome-wide Complex Trait Analysis (GCTA) that estimates the population variance explained by additive effects of DNA differences among unrelated individuals. For 1118 unrelated individuals in our sample with genotyping information on 1.7 million DNA markers, GCTA estimated zero heritability for number sense, unlike other cognitive abilities in the same twin study where the GCTA heritability estimates were about 25%. The low heritability of number sense, observed in this study, is consistent with the directional selection explanation whereby additive genetic variance for evolutionary important traits is reduced.

20 January 2023 in Psychological Science and Education
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VBV.S. Basyuk
V.S. Basyuk
SMSergey Malykh
Sergey Malykh
TTTatiana N. Tikhomirova
Tatiana N. Tikhomirova
The concept of the development of psychological support for higher education is revealed. Scientific arguments in favor of a federal network model for organizing qualified psychological assistance to students and teaching staff of universities are presented. The results of the population study conducted by the Russian Academy of Education with the participation of 21,943 first-year students from 22 Russian universities are reported. These results indicate a high degree of severity of emotional states of increased excitability, personal anxiety and a tendency to depressive manifestations among students. The priority areas of work on the development of the federal network of psychological services of universities are presented. The implementation of these areas is designed to systematically address the issues of accessibility of psychological assistance for students and teaching staff of each university, the high quality and completeness of the spectrum of such assistance. It is reported that with a network organization with a coordinating resource center, the psychological support of higher education will be characterized by the unity of the federal space for solving the problems of emergency professional response in providing psychological assistance to students and teaching staff.

26 March 2015 in Frontiers in Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MRMaja Rodic
Maja Rodic
TTTatiana N. Tikhomirova
Tatiana N. Tikhomirova
TKTatiana Kolienko
Tatiana Kolienko
SMSergey Malykh
Sergey Malykh
OBOlga Bogdanova
Olga Bogdanova
Yulia KovasYulia Kovas
Yulia Kovas
Previous research has consistently found an association between spatial and mathematical abilities. We hypothesised that this link may partially explain the consistently observed advantage in mathematics demonstrated by Asian children. Spatial complexity of the character-based writing systems may reflect or lead to a cognitive advantage relevant to mathematics. 721 6-9 -year old children from the UK and Russia were assessed on a battery of cognitive skills and arithmetic. The Russian children were recruited from specialist linguistic schools and divided into 4 different language groups, based on the second language they were learning (i.e. English, Spanish, Chinese and Japanese). The UK children attended regular schools and were not learning any second language. The testing took place twice across the school year, once at the beginning, before the start of the second language acquisition, and once at the end of the year. The study had two aims: (1) to test whether spatial ability predicts mathematical ability in 7-9 year old children across the samples; (2) to test whether acquisition and usage of a character-based writing system leads to an advantage in performance in arithmetic and related cognitive tasks. The longitudinal link from spatial ability to mathematics was found only in the Russian sample. The effect of second language acquisition on mathematics or other cognitive skills was negligible, although some effect of Chinese language on mathematical reasoning was suggested. Overall, the findings suggest that although spatial ability is related to mathematics at this age, one academic year of exposure to spatially complex writing systems is not enough to provide a mathematical advantage. Other educational and socio-cultural factors might play a greater role in explaining individual and cross-cultural differences in arithmetic at this age.