Johannes Duvekot

Dr. Johannes Duvekot


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

37Years (1990-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PWPensee Wu
Pensee Wu
CBCaroline Van Den Berg
Caroline Van Den Berg
ZAZarko Alfirevic
Zarko Alfirevic
SOShaughn O’brien
Shaughn O’brien
MRMaria Röthlisberger
Maria Röthlisberger
JDJohannes Duvekot
Johannes Duvekot
Pre-eclampsia (PE) complicates 2%–8% of all pregnancies and is an important cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality worldwide. In order to reduce these complications and to develop possible treatment modalities, it is important to identify women at risk of developing PE. The use of biomarkers in early pregnancy would allow appropriate stratification into high and low risk pregnancies for the purpose of defining surveillance in pregnancy and to administer interventions. We used formal methods for a systematic review and meta-analyses to assess the accuracy of all biomarkers that have been evaluated so far during the first and early second trimester of pregnancy to predict PE. We found low predictive values using individual biomarkers which included a disintegrin and metalloprotease 12 (ADAM-12), inhibin-A, pregnancy associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A), placental growth factor (PlGF) and placental protein 13 (PP-13). The pooled sensitivity of all single biomarkers was 0.40 (95% CI 0.39–0.41) at a false positive rate of 10%. The area under the Summary of Receiver Operating Characteristics Curve (SROC) was 0.786 (SE 0.02). When a combination model was used, the predictive value improved to an area under the SROC of 0.893 (SE 0.03). In conclusion, although there are multiple potential biomarkers for PE their efficacy has been inconsistent and comparisons are difficult because of heterogeneity between different studies. Therefore, there is an urgent need for high quality, large-scale multicentre research in biomarkers for PE so that the best predictive marker(s) can be identified in order to improve the management of women destined to develop PE.

10 January 2014 in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BPBw Prick
Bw Prick
AJAjg Jansen
Ajg Jansen
ESEap Steegers
Eap Steegers
WHWcj Hop
Wcj Hop
MEMl Essink‐Bot
Ml Essink‐Bot
JDJohannes Duvekot
Johannes Duvekot
Objective: To assess the effect of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion on quality of life in acutely anaemic women after postpartum haemorrhage.Design: Randomised non‐inferiority trial.Setting: Thirty‐seven Dutch university and general hospitals.Population: Women with acute anaemia (haemoglobin 4.8–7.9 g/dl [3.0–4.9 mmol/l] 12–24 hours postpartum) without severe anaemic symptoms or severe comorbidities.Methods: Women were allocated to RBC transfusion or non‐intervention.Main outcome measures: Primary outcome was physical fatigue 3 days postpartum (Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory, scale 4–20; 20 represents maximal fatigue). Non‐inferiority was demonstrated if the physical fatigue difference between study arms was maximal 1.3. Secondary outcomes were health‐related quality of life and physical complications. Health‐related quality of life questionnaires were completed at five time‐points until 6 weeks postpartum.Results: In all, 521 women were randomised to non‐intervention (n = 262) or RBC transfusion (n = 259). Mean physical fatigue score at day 3 postpartum, adjusted for baseline and mode of delivery, was 0.8 lower in the RBC transfusion arm (95% confidence interval: 0.1–1.5, P = 0.02) and at 1 week postpartum was 1.06 lower (95% confidence interval: 0.3–1.8, P = 0.01). A median of two RBC units was transfused in the RBC transfusion arm. In the non‐intervention arm, 33 women received RBC transfusion, mainly because of anaemic symptoms. Physical complications were comparable.Conclusions: Statistically, non‐inferiority could not be demonstrated as the confidence interval crossed the non‐inferiority boundary. Nevertheless, with only a small difference in physical fatigue and no differences in secondary outcomes, implementation of restrictive management seems clinically justified.

1 January 2020 in Pregnancy Hypertension
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ABAnisha R. Bouter
Anisha R. Bouter
JDJohannes Duvekot
Johannes Duvekot

1 February 2015 in European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BPBabette W. Prick
Babette W. Prick
DBDenise Bijlenga
Denise Bijlenga
AJA.J. Gerard Jansen
A.J. Gerard Jansen
KBKim E. Boers
Kim E. Boers
SSSicco A. Scherjon
Sicco A. Scherjon
JDJohannes Duvekot
Johannes Duvekot

21 August 2023 in Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
GMGillian M. Maher
Gillian M. Maher
Liam J. WardLiam J. Ward
Liam J. Ward
LHLeah Hernandez
Leah Hernandez
MKMarius Kublickas
Marius Kublickas
JDJohannes Duvekot
Johannes Duvekot
KKKarolina Kublickiene
Karolina Kublickiene
Introduction: Previous evidence examining the association between socioeconomic status and pregnancy complications are conflicted and often limited to using area‐based measures of socioeconomic status. In this study, we aimed to examine the association between individual‐level socioeconomic factors and a wide range of adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes using data from the IMPROvED birth cohort conducted in Sweden, the Netherlands and Republic of Ireland.Material and methods: The study cohort consisted of women who participated in the IMPROvED birth cohort between 2013 and 2017. Data on socioeconomic factors were self‐reported and obtained at 15 weeks' gestation, and included level of education, employment status, relationship status, and income. Data on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes included gestational hypertension, pre‐eclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus, emergency cesarean section, preterm birth, post term delivery, small for gestational age and Apgar score at 1 min. These data were obtained within 72 h following delivery and confirmed using medical records. Multivariable logistic regression examined the association between each socioeconomic variable and each outcome separately adjusting for maternal age, maternal body mass index, maternal smoking, maternal alcohol consumption and cohort center. We also examined the effect of exposure to any ≥2 risk factors compared to none.Results: A total of 2879 participants were included. Adjusted results suggested that those with less than third level of education had an increased odds of gestational hypertension (OR: 1.74, 95% CI: 1.23–2.46), while those on a middle level of income had a reduced odds of emergency cesarean section (OR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.42–0.84). No significant associations were observed between socioeconomic variables and neonatal outcomes. Exposure to any ≥2 socioeconomic risk factors was associated with an increased risk of preterm birth (OR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.06–2.89).Conclusions: We did not find strong evidence of associations between individual‐level socioeconomic factors and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in high‐income settings overall, with only few significant associations observed among pregnancy outcomes.

5 November 2020 in Blood
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FLFrank W. G. Leebeek
Frank W. G. Leebeek
JDJohannes Duvekot
Johannes Duvekot
MKMarieke Kruip
Marieke Kruip
Women with inherited bleeding disorders, including carriers of hemophilia A and B, or with von Willebrand disease, have an increased risk of bleeding during pregnancy and delivery. The unborn child may also be affected by the bleeding disorder for which specific measures have to be considered. This requires a multidisciplinary approach, with a team that includes a hematologist, a pediatric hematologist, a clinical geneticist, an obstetrician-perinatologist, and an anesthesiologist. An optimal approach includes prepregnancy genetic counseling, prenatal diagnostic procedures, and a treatment plan for delivery for both the mother and child. Recent retrospective studies show that even if strict guidelines are followed, these women are still at risk of postpartum bleeding. This occurs even if coagulation factor levels are normalized, either due to the pregnancy-induced rise of factor levels or by infusion of coagulation factor concentrates at the time of delivery. In this article, we describe our current diagnostic and clinical management of pregnancy and delivery in women with inherited bleeding disorders. We also briefly discuss possible interventions to improve the outcome of current strategies by increasing target factor levels during and after delivery.