Simo Saarakkala

Prof. Simo Saarakkala

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
27 December 2019 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ATAleksei Tiulpin
Aleksei Tiulpin
SKStefan Klein
Stefan Klein
SBSita M. A. Bierma-Zeinstra
Sita M. A. Bierma-Zeinstra
JTJérôme Thevenot
Jérôme Thevenot
EREsa Rahtu
Esa Rahtu
SSSimo Saarakkala
Simo Saarakkala
Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common musculoskeletal disease without a cure, and current treatment options are limited to symptomatic relief. Prediction of OA progression is a very challenging and timely issue, and it could, if resolved, accelerate the disease modifying drug development and ultimately help to prevent millions of total joint replacement surgeries performed annually. Here, we present a multi-modal machine learning-based OA progression prediction model that utilises raw radiographic data, clinical examination results and previous medical history of the patient. We validated this approach on an independent test set of 3,918 knee images from 2,129 subjects. Our method yielded area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.79 (0.78–0.81) and Average Precision (AP) of 0.68 (0.66–0.70). In contrast, a reference approach, based on logistic regression, yielded AUC of 0.75 (0.74–0.77) and AP of 0.62 (0.60–0.64). The proposed method could significantly improve the subject selection process for OA drug-development trials and help the development of personalised therapeutic plans.

1 January 2010 in Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SSSimo Saarakkala
Simo Saarakkala
Petro JulkunenPetro Julkunen
Petro Julkunen
PKP. Kiviranta
P. Kiviranta
JMJ. Mäkitalo
J. Mäkitalo
JJJ.S. Jurvelin
J.S. Jurvelin
RKR.K. Korhonen
R.K. Korhonen

1 May 2012 in Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LRL. Rieppo
L. Rieppo
SSSimo Saarakkala
Simo Saarakkala
TNT. Närhi
T. Närhi
HHH.J. Helminen
H.J. Helminen
JJJ.S. Jurvelin
J.S. Jurvelin
JRJ. Rieppo
J. Rieppo

1 July 2020 in Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Frank RoemerFrank Roemer
Frank Roemer
SDShadpour Demehri
Shadpour Demehri
POPatrick Omoumi
Patrick Omoumi
TLThomas M. Link
Thomas M. Link
RKRichard Kijowski
Richard Kijowski
AGAli Guermazi
Ali Guermazi
Imaging in osteoarthritis has developed rapidly in the last decade and, despite the lack of effective therapies, there is hope that imaging might help drive a therapeutic breakthrough in the near f... Osteoarthritis (OA) is a highly prevalent chronic condition with marked implications for affected individuals and public health care. There are available treatments to manage pain and symptoms but ...

10 November 2020 in Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ATAleksei Tiulpin
Aleksei Tiulpin
SSSimo Saarakkala
Simo Saarakkala
Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common musculoskeletal disease in the world. In primary healthcare, knee OA is diagnosed using clinical examination and radiographic assessment. Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) atlas of OA radiographic features allows performing independent assessment of knee osteophytes, joint space narrowing and other knee features. This provides a fine-grained OA severity assessment of the knee, compared to the gold standard and most commonly used Kellgren–Lawrence (KL) composite score. In this study, we developed an automatic method to predict KL and OARSI grades from knee radiographs. Our method is based on Deep Learning and leverages an ensemble of residual networks with 50 layers. We used transfer learning from ImageNet with a fine-tuning on the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) dataset. An independent testing of our model was performed on the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study (MOST) dataset. Our method yielded Cohen’s kappa coefficients of 0.82 for KL-grade and 0.79, 0.84, 0.94, 0.83, 0.84 and 0.90 for femoral osteophytes, tibial osteophytes and joint space narrowing for lateral and medial compartments, respectively. Furthermore, our method yielded area under the ROC curve of 0.98 and average precision of 0.98 for detecting the presence of radiographic OA, which is better than the current state-of-the-art.

1 December 2006 in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JKJ M Koski
J M Koski
SSSimo Saarakkala
Simo Saarakkala
MHM Helle
M Helle
UHU Hakulinen
U Hakulinen
JHJ O Heikkinen
J O Heikkinen
HHH Hermunen
H Hermunen
To examine the validity of power Doppler ultrasound imaging to identify synovitis, using histopathology as gold standard, and to assess the performance of ultrasound equipments. 44 synovial sites in small and large joints, bursae and tendon sheaths were depicted with ultrasound. A synovial biopsy was performed on the site depicted and a synovial sample was taken for histopathological evaluation. The performance of three ultrasound devices was tested using flow phantoms. A positive Doppler signal was detected in 29 of 35 (83%) of the patients with active histological inflammation. In eight additional samples, histological examination showed other pathological synovial findings and a Doppler signal was detected in five of them. No significant correlation was found between the amount of Doppler signal and histological synovitis score (r = 0.239, p = NS). The amount of subsynovial infiltration of polymorphonuclear leucocytes and surface fibrin correlated significantly with the amount of power Doppler signal: r = 0.397 (p<0.01) and 0.328 (p<0.05), respectively. The ultrasound devices differed in showing the smallest detectable flow. A negative Doppler signal does not exclude the possibility of synovitis. A positive Doppler signal in the synovium is an indicator of an active synovial inflammation in patients. A Doppler signal does not correlate with the extent of the inflammation and it can also be seen in other synovial reactions. It is important that the quality measurements of ultrasound devices are reported, because the results should be evaluated against the quality of the device used.