Zhiming Fang

Prof. Zhiming Fang

State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China;
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 October 2020 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Shaicheng ShenShaicheng Shen
Shaicheng Shen
ZFZhiming Fang
Zhiming Fang
XLXiaochun Li
Xiaochun Li
The relative permeability of coal to gas and water is an essential parameter for characterizing coalbed methane (CBM) reservoirs and predicting coal seam gas production, particularly in numerical simulations. Although a variety of studies related to the relative permeability of coals have been conducted, the results hardly meet the needs of practical engineering applications. To track the dynamic development of relative permeability measurements in the laboratory, discover the deficiencies, and discuss further work in this field, this paper investigates the relative permeability measurement preparation work and laboratory methods and summarizes the development of techniques used to determine the water saturation during experimentation. The previously determined relative permeability curves are also assembled and classified according to coal rank and the absolute permeability. It is found that the general operations in the relative permeability measurement process are still not standardized. The techniques applied to determine the water saturation of coal in experiments have been refined to some extent, but no optimal technique has been recognized yet. New techniques, such as the incorporation of high-precision differential pressure gauges, can be used to determine the water production during relative permeability measurement. In addition, the existing relative permeability data are limited, and no study has focused on supercritical carbon dioxide-water and mixed gas (methane and carbon dioxide)-water relative permeability measurements. To meet the requirements of actual projects, further research on this topic must be conducted.

29 November 2022 in Measurement Science and Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Shaicheng ShenShaicheng Shen
Shaicheng Shen
ZFZhiming Fang
Zhiming Fang
XLXiaochun Li
Xiaochun Li
Relative permeability is essential for understanding porous media’s gas and water seepage characteristics and establishing production schedules in practical engineering applications. However, the movable water is too small to be detected in ultra-lowpermeability rocks, and it is difficult to determine the water saturation in the relative permeability measurement accurately. In this study, a differential pressure transducer (DPT) was applied to self-developed apparatus to quantify displaced water precisely. The results indicate that: (a) both the permeability and the relative permeability measurement results show high stability in repeatability tests with the application of DPT. (b) The final cumulative water flow data measured by the DPT is reliable; the relative error of the electronic balance and DPT value was less than 4%. (c) This self-developed instrument can obtain the relative permeability curve for ultra-low permeability rocks, such as tight sandstone and anthracite coal. Although there are limitations, this technique provides an economical and reliable pathway for studying the seepage characteristics of gas and water in ultra-low permeability rocks.

10 October 2025 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZFZhiming Fang
Zhiming Fang
CYChenlong Yang
Chenlong Yang
Shaicheng ShenShaicheng Shen
Shaicheng Shen
The influence of stress on gas sorption behavior and sorption-induced swelling in coal is critical for the success of CO2-enhanced coalbed methane recovery (CO2-ECBM) and geological carbon sequestration—a key strategy for mitigating climate change and promoting clean energy transitions. However, this influence remains insufficiently understood, largely due to experimental limitations (e.g., overreliance on powdered coal samples) and conflicting theoretical frameworks in existing studies. To address this gap, this study systematically investigates the effects of two distinct stress constraints—constant confining pressure and constant volume—on CO2 adsorption capacity, adsorption kinetics, and associated swelling deformation of intact anthracite coal cores. An integrated experimental apparatus was custom-designed for this study, combining volumetric sorption measurement with high-resolution strain monitoring via the confining fluid displacement (CFD) method and the confining pressure response (CPR) method. This setup enables the quantification of CO2–coal interactions under precisely controlled stress environments. Key findings reveal that stress conditions exert a regulatory role in shaping CO2–coal behavior: constant confining pressure conditions enhance CO2 adsorption capacity and sustain adsorption kinetics by accommodating matrix swelling, thereby preserving pore accessibility for continuous gas uptake. In contrast, constant volume constraints lead to rapid internal stress buildup, which inhibits further gas adsorption and accelerates the attainment of kinetic saturation. Sorption-induced swelling exhibits clear dependence on both pressure and constraint conditions. Elevated CO2 pressure leads to increased strain, while constant confining pressure facilitates more gradual, sustained expansion. This is particularly evident at higher pressures, where adsorption-induced swelling prevails over mechanical constraints. These results help resolve key discrepancies in the existing literature by clarifying the dual role of stress in modulating both pore accessibility (for gas transport) and mechanical response (for matrix deformation). These insights provide essential guidance for optimizing CO2 injection strategies and improving the long-term performance and sustainability of CO2-ECBM and geological carbon storage projects, ultimately supporting global efforts in carbon emission reduction and sustainable energy resource utilization.

2 October 2020 in Geofluids
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Shaicheng ShenShaicheng Shen
Shaicheng Shen
XLXiaochun Li
Xiaochun Li
ZFZhiming Fang
Zhiming Fang
NSNao Shen
Nao Shen
The permeability of coal is an indispensable parameter for predicting the coalbed methane (CBM) and enhanced CBM (ECBM) production. Considering the low permeability characteristics of coal, the permeability is usually measured by the transient technique in the laboratory. Normally, it is assumed that the calculated permeability will not greatly vary if the pulse pressure applied in the experiment is small (less than 10 of pore pressure) and previous studies have not focused on the effect of the pulse pressure on the measurement permeability. However, for sorptive rock, such as coals and shales, the sorption effect may cause different measurement results under different pulse pressures. In this study, both nonadsorbing gas (helium) and adsorbing gas (carbon dioxide) were used to investigate the adsorption effect on the gas permeability of coal measurement with the pulse-decay technique. A series of experiments under different pore pressures and pulse pressures was performed, and the carbon dioxide permeability was calculated by both Cui et al.s and Jones methods. The results show that the carbon dioxide permeability calculated by Jones method was underestimated because the adsorption effect was not considered. In addition, by comparing the helium and carbon dioxide permeabilities under different pulse pressures, we found that the carbon dioxide permeability of coal was more sensitive to the pulse pressure due to the adsorption effect. Thus, to obtain the accurate permeability of coal, the effect of adsorption should be considered when measuring the permeability of adsorptive media with adsorbing gas by the transient technique, and more effort is required to eliminate the effect of the pulse pressure on the measured permeability.

11 November 2025 in Separations
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CYChenlong Yang
Chenlong Yang
ZFZhiming Fang
Zhiming Fang
Shaicheng ShenShaicheng Shen
Shaicheng Shen
HWHaibin Wang
Haibin Wang
Coalbed methane (CBM) is a vital clean energy resource, yet its extraction efficiency is often hindered by rapid production decline and low production rates in medium-shallow reservoirs. This study investigates the potential of CO2 huff-and-puff technology to enhance CBM recovery and achieve CO2 storage in low-productivity wells. A comprehensive model, constructed based on the geological conditions of the Qinshui Basin, was developed. Numerical simulations revealed that CO2 huff-and-puff significantly improves CH4 production by displacing adsorbed CH4 and maintaining reservoir pressure. Key findings indicate that higher CO2 injection volumes yield substantial increases in both peak CH4 production and cumulative production compared with conventional extraction. Optimal soaking times balance recovery efficiency and operational costs. Sensitivity analysis identified gas diffusion coefficients, initial permeability, and Langmuir volume constants as critical geological parameters influencing the performance. This study preliminarily demonstrates the feasibility of large-scale CO2 huff-and-puff for enhancing production in low-productivity CBM wells and provides theoretical insights for revitalizing China’s underperforming CBM wells while advancing carbon neutrality goals, although further experimental validation is still required.

31 May 2026 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CYChenlong Yang
Chenlong Yang
ZFZhiming Fang
Zhiming Fang
CO2 enhanced coalbed methane recovery (CO2-ECBM) using huff-and-puff technology has attracted increasing attention as a promising approach to enhance the productivity of low-productivity coalbed methane (CBM) wells while simultaneously enabling CO2 storage. However, the economic feasibility of this method and the optimal soaking time remains unclear. In this study, an economic evaluation model for CO2 huff-and-puff CBM projects was developed based on the discounted cash flow method, incorporating key factors such as CBM price, government subsidies, carbon trading price, CH4 separation cost, and CO2 purchase and injection costs. Three representative scenarios were designed to evaluate the impacts of policy support and market conditions. The effects of CO2 injection volume and soaking time on net cash flow (NCF), net present value (NPV), and dynamic payback period (DPP) were systematically investigated. The results indicate that CO2 huff-and-puff is economically viable for enhancing CBM recovery. Increasing CO2 injection volume markedly improves CH4 production and project revenue, but also leads to higher initial investment and a longer payback period. The economic performance exhibits a non-monotonic dependence on soaking time, with an optimal range that maximizes NPV. Specifically, the optimal soaking time ranges from 30 to 60 days for injection volumes up to 2000 t, and from 60 to 90 days for higher injection volumes. External economic factors exert a strong influence on project performance: higher carbon trading prices and lower CO2 purchase costs markedly improve profitability, while government subsidies effectively increase net returns and shorten the payback period. In the absence of subsidies, higher injection volumes are required to maintain economic viability. Overall, this study provides a comprehensive economic evaluation framework for CO2 huff-and-puff CBM projects, identifies key operational and economic parameters for optimizing project performance, and offers theoretical support for field-scale applications. Nevertheless, the economic evaluation is based on deterministic numerical simulation results and simplified market assumptions. Long-term operational risks and geological heterogeneity are not explicitly considered, which may limit the applicability of the results under field conditions.