Thermodynamic parameters for prediction of RNA duplex stability are reported. One parameter for duplex initiation and 10 parameters for helix propagation are derived from enthalpy and free-energy changes for helix formation by 45 RNA oligonucleotide duplexes. The oligomer sequences were chosen to maximize reliability of secondary structure predictions. Each of the 10 nearest-neighbor sequences is well-represented among the 45 oligonucleotides, and the sequences were chosen to minimize experimental errors in delta GO at 37 degrees C. These parameters predict melting temperatures of most oligonucleotide duplexes within 5 degrees C. This is about as good as can be expected from the nearest-neighbor model. Free-energy changes for helix propagation at dangling ends, terminal mismatches, and internal G X U mismatches, and free-energy changes for helix initiation at hairpin loops, internal loops, or internal bulges are also tabulated.

Thermodynamic data are reported revealing that pseudouridine (Ψ) can stabilize RNA duplexes when replacing U and forming Ψ-A, Ψ-G, Ψ-U and Ψ-C pairs. Stabilization is dependent on type of base pair, position of Ψ within the RNA duplex, and type and orientation of adjacent Watson–Crick pairs. NMR spectra demonstrate that for internal Ψ-A, Ψ-G and Ψ-U pairs, the N3 imino proton is hydrogen bonded to the opposite strand nucleotide and the N1 imino proton may also be hydrogen bonded. CD spectra show that general A-helix structure is preserved, but there is some shifting of peaks and changing of intensities. Ψ has two hydrogen donors (N1 and N3 imino protons) and two hydrogen bond acceptors because the glycosidic bond is C-C rather than C-N as in uridine. This greater structural potential may allow Ψ to behave as a kind of structurally driven universal base because it can enhance stability relative to U when paired with A, G, U or C inside a double helix. These structural and thermodynamic properties may contribute to the biological functions of Ψ.

The N⁶‐alkyladenosines and 2‐methylthio‐N⁶‐alkyladenosines make up over half of the population of all naturally modified adenosines and they are present in the transfer ribonucleic acids (tRNA) at position 37. We measured effects of N⁶‐alkyladenosines and 2‐methylthio‐N⁶‐alkyladenosines on the thermodynamic stability of RNA duplexes containing a U‐A^Mod base pair at internal and terminal duplex positions, as well as containing modified adenosines as a 3′‐terminal unpaired nucleotide. Beside naturally modified adenosines such as N⁶‐isopentenyladenosine (i⁶A), N⁶‐methyladenosine (m⁶A), 2‐methylthio‐N⁶‐isopentenyladenosine (ms²i⁶A) and 2‐methylthio‐N⁶‐methyladenosine (ms²m⁶A), we studied several artificial modifications to evaluate the steric and electronic effects of N⁶‐alkyl substituents. Moreover, some N⁶‐alkyladenosines and 2‐methylthio‐N⁶‐alkyladenosines were placed in hairpins at positions corresponding to nucleotide 37 of the tRNA anticodon arm, and the thermodynamic stability of those hairpins was studied. The stability of the modified RNA hairpins was measured in standard melting buffer containing 1 M sodium chloride as well as in physiological buffer containing 10 mM magnesium chloride and 150 mM potassium chloride. The results obtained indicate that the nature of the adenosine modification and the position of U‐A^Mod base pairs within the duplex influence the thermodynamic stability of RNA duplexes. For most of the modification, the destabilization of duplexes was observed. Moreover, we found that the buffer composition and the structure of the modified adenosine very significantly affect the thermodynamic stability of RNA.

Oligonucleotide microarrays are widely used in various biological studies. In this review, application of oligonucleotide microarrays for identifying binding sites and probing structure of RNAs is described. Deep sequencing allows fast determination of DNA and RNA sequence. High-throughput methods for determination of secondary structures of RNAs have also been developed. Those methods, however, do not reveal binding sites for oligonucleotides. In contrast, microarrays directly determine binding sites while also providing structural insights. Microarray mapping can be used over a wide range of experimental conditions, including temperature, pH, various cations at different concentrations and the presence of other molecules. Moreover, it is possible to make universal microarrays suitable for investigations of many different RNAs, and readout of results is rapid. Thus, microarrays are used to provide insight into oligonucleotide sequences potentially able to interfere with biological function. Better understanding of structure–function relationships of RNA can be facilitated by using microarrays to find RNA regions capable to bind oligonucleotides. That information is extremely important to design optimal sequences for antisense oligonucleotides and siRNA because both bind to single-stranded regions of target RNAs.