William Pardridge

Prof. William Pardridge

University of California
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

54Years (1973-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 August 2012 in Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
William PardridgeWilliam Pardridge
William Pardridge
The blood–brain barrier (BBB) prevents the brain uptake of most pharmaceuticals. This property arises from the epithelial-like tight junctions within the brain capillary endothelium. The BBB is anatomically and functionally distinct from the blood–cerebrospinal fluid barrier at the choroid plexus. Certain small molecule drugs may cross the BBB via lipid-mediated free diffusion, providing the drug has a molecular weight <400 Da and forms <8 hydrogen bonds. These chemical properties are lacking in the majority of small molecule drugs, and all large molecule drugs. Nevertheless, drugs can be reengineered for BBB transport, based on the knowledge of the endogenous transport systems within the BBB. Small molecule drugs can be synthesized that access carrier-mediated transport (CMT) systems within the BBB. Large molecule drugs can be reengineered with molecular Trojan horse delivery systems to access receptor-mediated transport (RMT) systems within the BBB. Peptide and antisense radiopharmaceuticals are made brain-penetrating with the combined use of RMT-based delivery systems and avidin–biotin technology. Knowledge on the endogenous CMT and RMT systems expressed at the BBB enable new solutions to the problem of BBB drug transport.

1 January 2007 in Drug Discovery Today
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
William PardridgeWilliam Pardridge
William Pardridge

1 October 1983 in Physiological Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
William PardridgeWilliam Pardridge
William Pardridge

1 March 2003 in Molecular Interventions
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
William PardridgeWilliam Pardridge
William Pardridge
As human longevity increases, the likelihood of the onset of diseases of the brain (and other organs) also increases. Clinical therapeutics offer useful long-term treatments, if not cures, if drugs can be delivered appropriately and effectively. Unfortunately, research in drug transport to the brain has not advanced very far. Through better characterization of the transport systems utilized within the blood-brain barrier, a greater understanding of how to exploit these systems will lead to effective treatments for brain disorders. Pardridge reviews the functions of the various known transport systems in the brain and discusses how the development of BBB drug-targeting programs in pharmaceutical and academic settings may lead to more efficacious treatments.

26 November 1996 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JHJoerg Huwyler
Joerg Huwyler
DWDafang Wu
Dafang Wu
William PardridgeWilliam Pardridge
William Pardridge
Immunoliposomes (antibody-directed liposomes) were used in the present study for delivery of the antineoplastic agent daunomycin to the rat brain. A coupling procedure was introduced, which allows conjugation of a thiolated antibody to maleimide-grafted 85-nm liposomes sterically stabilized with PEG. Antibody was thereby coupled to the terminal end of a PEG-conjugated linker lipid. No brain uptake of PEG-conjugated liposomes carrying [ 3 H]daunomycin was observed. However, brain targeting of immunoliposomes carrying [ 3 H]daunomycin was mediated by the OX26 monoclonal antibody to the rat transferrin receptor, which is selectively enriched at the brain microvascular endothelium that comprises the blood–brain barrier in vivo . Coupling of 30 OX26 antibodies per liposome resulted in optimal brain delivery. Saturation of delivery was observed at higher antibody densities. Determination of brain levels of immunoliposomes over 24 h revealed that immunoliposomes accumulate in brain tissue. Brain targeting of immunoliposomes was not observed in immunoliposomes conjugated with a mouse IgG 2a isotype control. In addition, coinjection of free OX26 saturated plasma clearance of immunoliposomes. Since a single liposome may carry ≥10,000 drug molecules, the use of PEG-conjugated immunoliposomes increases the drug carrying capacity of the monoclonal antibody by up to 4 logarithmic orders in magnitude. In summary, specific OX26-mediated targeting of daunomycin to the rat brain was achieved by the use of an immunoliposome-based drug delivery system.

1 October 1990 in Journal of Biological Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
William PardridgeWilliam Pardridge
William Pardridge
RBR J Boado
R J Boado
CFC R Farrell
C R Farrell
The hypothesis that the GLUT-1 glucose transporter isoform is expressed selectively in brain at the capillary endothelium, i.e. the blood-brain barrier (BBB), was tested by using quantitative Western blotting, cytochalasin B binding, and in situ hybridization in bovine brain cortex. Purified human red cell glucose transporter was used as the standard for quantitative Western blots, because the mobility of the human erythrocyte and BBB glucose transporters in electrophoretic gels was identical. The concentration of immunoreactive glucose transporter in bovine BBB plasma membranes was 10.8 +/- 0.9 pmol/mgp (mean +/- S.E., n = 6). This value was not statistically different from the estimate of the maximal binding sites of D-glucose-displaceable [3H]cytochalasin B binding in the BBB membrane preparations, 11.7 +/- 3.5 pmol/mgp. In situ hybridization experiments using 35S-labeled antisense and sense riboprobes corresponding to nucleotides 385-932 of the GLUT-1 cDNA showed prominent hybridization of the antisense probe over brain microvascular endothelium, but no hybridization over neuropil greater than that found with the 35S-labeled sense probe. These studies are consistent with the following conclusion: (a) essentially 100% of the glucose transporter binding sites at the BBB can be accounted for by the GLUT-1 isoform; (b) in situ hybridization studies confirm previous Northern blot analysis and indicate the GLUT-1 gene is expressed selectively in microvascular endothelium in brain with minimal, if any, expression of this gene in neurons or glial cells in vivo.