Tae-Woong Kim

Prof. Dr. Tae-Woong Kim

Hanyang University Erica Campus
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2003 in Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Tae-Woong KimTae-Woong Kim
Tae-Woong Kim
JVJuan B. Valdés
Juan B. Valdés
Droughts are destructive climatic extreme events that may cause significant damage both in natural environments and in human lives. Drought forecasting plays an important role in the control and management of water resources systems. In this study, a conjunction model is presented to forecast droughts. The proposed conjunction model is based on dyadic wavelet transforms and neural networks. Neural networks have shown great ability in modeling and forecasting nonlinear and nonstationary time series in a water resources engineering, and wavelet transforms provide useful decompositions of an original time series. The wavelet-transformed data aid in improving the model performance by capturing helpful information on various resolution levels. Neural networks are used to forecast decomposed subsignals in various resolution levels and reconstruct forecasted subsignals. The model was applied to forecast droughts in the Conchos River Basin in Mexico, which is the most important tributary of the Lower Rio Grande/B...

1 September 2020 in Journal of Hydrology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Muhammad JehanzaibMuhammad Jehanzaib
Muhammad Jehanzaib
Sabab Ali ShahSabab Ali Shah
Sabab Ali Shah
JYJiyoung Yoo
Jiyoung Yoo
Tae-Woong KimTae-Woong Kim
Tae-Woong Kim

16 December 2019 in Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Muhammad JehanzaibMuhammad Jehanzaib
Muhammad Jehanzaib
Muhammad Nouman SattarMuhammad Nouman Sattar
Muhammad Nouman Sattar
JLJoo-Heon Lee
Joo-Heon Lee
Tae-Woong KimTae-Woong Kim
Tae-Woong Kim

1 March 2015 in Journal of Hydro-environment Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HKHungsoo Kim
Hungsoo Kim
JPJongyong Park
Jongyong Park
JYJiyoung Yoo
Jiyoung Yoo
Tae-Woong KimTae-Woong Kim
Tae-Woong Kim

1 August 2015 in Journal of Hydrology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MWMuhammad Waseem
Muhammad Waseem
Muhammad AjmalMuhammad Ajmal
Muhammad Ajmal
Tae-Woong KimTae-Woong Kim
Tae-Woong Kim

10 October 2022 in Climate
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Muhammad JehanzaibMuhammad Jehanzaib
Muhammad Jehanzaib
Muhammad AjmalMuhammad Ajmal
Muhammad Ajmal
MAMohammed ACHITE
Mohammed ACHITE
Tae-Woong KimTae-Woong Kim
Tae-Woong Kim
Runoff plays an essential part in the hydrological cycle, as it regulates the quantity of water which flows into streams and returns surplus water into the oceans. Runoff modelling may assist in understanding, controlling, and monitoring the quality and amount of water resources. The aim of this article is to discuss various categories of rainfall–runoff models, recent developments, and challenges of rainfall–runoff models in flood prediction in the modern era. Rainfall–runoff models are classified into conceptual, empirical, and physical process-based models depending upon the framework and spatial processing of their algorithms. Well-known runoff models which belong to these categories include the Soil Conservation Service Curve Number (SCS-CN) model, Storm Water Management model (SWMM), Hydrologiska Byråns Vattenbalansavdelning (HBV) model, Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model, and the Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) model, etc. In addition, the data-driven models such as Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Deep Neural Network (DNN), and Support Vector Machine (SVM) have proven to be better performance solutions in runoff modelling and flood prediction in recent decades. The data-driven models detect the best relationship based on the input data series and the output in order to model the runoff process. Finally, the strengths and downsides of the outlined models in terms of understanding variation in runoff modelling and flood prediction were discussed. The findings of this comprehensive study suggested that hybrid models for runoff modeling and flood prediction should be developed by combining the strengths of traditional models and machine learning methods. This article suggests future research initiatives that could help with filling existing gaps in rainfall–runoff research and will also assist hydrological scientists in selecting appropriate rainfall–runoff models for flood prediction and mitigation based on their benefits and drawbacks.