Mourad ASSIDI

Prof. Mourad ASSIDI

RI, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
orcid
Professor, Team Leader

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2016 in Asian Journal of Andrology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Ashok AgarwalAshok Agarwal
Ashok Agarwal
DDDamayanthi Durairajanayagam
Damayanthi Durairajanayagam
STSindhuja Tatagari
Sindhuja Tatagari
Sandro EstevesSandro Esteves
Sandro Esteves
AHAvi Harlev
Avi Harlev
ABAsher Bashiri
Asher Bashiri
Traditionally, the success of a researcher is assessed by the number of publications he or she publishes in peer-reviewed, indexed, high impact journals. This essential yardstick, often referred to as the impact of a specific researcher, is assessed through the use of various metrics. While researchers may be acquainted with such matrices, many do not know how to use them to enhance their careers. In addition to these metrics, a number of other factors should be taken into consideration to objectively evaluate a scientist's profile as a researcher and academician. Moreover, each metric has its own limitations that need to be considered when selecting an appropriate metric for evaluation. This paper provides a broad overview of the wide array of metrics currently in use in academia and research. Popular metrics are discussed and defined, including traditional metrics and article-level metrics, some of which are applied to researchers for a greater understanding of a particular concept, including varicocele that is the thematic area of this Special Issue of Asian Journal of Andrology. We recommend the combined use of quantitative and qualitative evaluation using judiciously selected metrics for a more objective assessment of scholarly output and research impact.

19 April 2015 in Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RSRakesh Sharma
Rakesh Sharma
Ashok AgarwalAshok Agarwal
Ashok Agarwal
VRVikram K Rohra
Vikram K Rohra
MAMourad ASSIDI
Mourad ASSIDI
MAMuhammad Abu-Elmagd
Muhammad Abu-Elmagd
RTRola F Turki
Rola F Turki
Over the last decade, there has been a significant increase in average paternal age when the first child is conceived, either due to increased life expectancy, widespread use of contraception, late marriages and other factors. While the effect of maternal ageing on fertilization and reproduction is well known and several studies have shown that women over 35 years have a higher risk of infertility, pregnancy complications, spontaneous abortion, congenital anomalies, and perinatal complications. The effect of paternal age on semen quality and reproductive function is controversial for several reasons. First, there is no universal definition for advanced paternal ageing. Secondly, the literature is full of studies with conflicting results, especially for the most common parameters tested. Advancing paternal age also has been associated with increased risk of genetic disease. Our exhaustive literature review has demonstrated negative effects on sperm quality and testicular functions with increasing paternal age. Epigenetics changes, DNA mutations along with chromosomal aneuploidies have been associated with increasing paternal age. In addition to increased risk of male infertility, paternal age has also been demonstrated to impact reproductive and fertility outcomes including a decrease in IVF/ICSI success rate and increasing rate of preterm birth. Increasing paternal age has shown to increase the incidence of different types of disorders like autism, schizophrenia, bipolar disorders, and childhood leukemia in the progeny. It is thereby essential to educate the infertile couples on the disturbing links between increased paternal age and rising disorders in their offspring, to better counsel them during their reproductive years.

1 August 2008 in Biology of Reproduction
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MAMourad ASSIDI
Mourad ASSIDI
IDIsabelle Dufort
Isabelle Dufort
AAAtef Ali
Atef Ali
MHMélanie Hamel
Mélanie Hamel
OAOmran Algriany
Omran Algriany
MSMarc Andre Sirard
Marc Andre Sirard
Oocyte competence is the ability of the oocyte to complete maturation, undergo successful fertilization, and reach the blastocyst stage. Cumulus cells are indispensable for this process. Their removal significantly affects the blastocyst rates. Moreover, the properties and functions of cumulus cells are regulated by the oocyte. They also reflect the oocyte's degree of maturation. Our study was aimed at identifying markers of oocyte competence that are expressed in bovine cumulus cells. In a previous study in our laboratory, the blastocyst yield following FSH or phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) treatment was 45%%. Therefore, we tested four sets of conditions during the first 6 h of in vitro maturation (IVM): FSH (0.1 μg/ml), PMA (0.1 μM), FSH ++ PMA, and negative control. Extracts from each IVM treatment were hybridized against the same negative control on a microarray containing a partial library of differentially expressed transcripts in the cumulus of competent oocytes collected at 6 h after LH in vivo. Common positive clones between diffentially treated cells were selected, and 15 candidates were validated by real-time PCR. Based on this, the main candidates expressed in cumulus cells and that could be valuable and indirect markers of oocyte competence are hyaluronan synthase 2 (HAS2), inhibin βA (INHBA), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), gremlin 1 (GREM1), betacellulin (BTC), CD44, tumor necrosis factor-induced protein 6 (TNFAIP6), and prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 (PTGS2). These biomarkers could be potential candidates to predict oocyte competence and to select higher-quality embryos for transfer. Additionally, these indirect predictors of oocyte competence and follicular health could improve our knowledge of gene expression patterns in the cumulus and yield insights into the molecular pathways controlling oocyte competence.

1 January 2014 in Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Ashok AgarwalAshok Agarwal
Ashok Agarwal
AMAditi Mulgund
Aditi Mulgund
SASaad Alshahrani
Saad Alshahrani
MAMourad ASSIDI
Mourad ASSIDI
AAAdel M Abuzenadah
Adel M Abuzenadah
ESEdmund Sabanegh
Edmund Sabanegh
Leukocytes contribute directly and indirectly to reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. Although leukocytospermia is defined as the presence of ≥1 × 106 white blood cells/mL (WBC/mL) in a semen sample, the presence of less than 1×106 WBC/mL (low-level leukocytospermia) can still produce a detectable amount of ROS, impairing sperm function and lowering the chances of pregnancy. Our objective was to assess the effect of low-level leukocytospermia on semen quality, ROS levels, and DNA damage in infertile men. Semen samples were examined from 472 patients and divided into 3 groups: no seminal leukocytes; group 2, men with low-level leukoctyospermia (0.1-1.0 × 106 WBC/mL); and group 3, frank leukocytospermia, (>1.0 × 106. WBC/mL). Semen analysis, leukoctyospermia, reactive oxygen species and DNA fragmentation was tested. Conventional semen parameters between the 3 groups were similar. Group 2 patients had significantly higher levels of ROS and sperm DNA fragmentation (1839.65 ± 2173.57RLU/s; DNA damage: 26.47 ± 19.64%) compared with group 1 (ROS: 1101.09 ± 5557.54 RLU/s; DNA damage: 19.89 ± 17.31%) (ROS: p = 0.002; DNA damage: p = 0.047). There was no significant difference in ROS levels between groups 2 and 3. Patients presenting with low-level leukocytospermia have seminal oxidative stress. Although these patients are not categorized as leukocytospermic by current World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines, these men may benefit by treatment with antibiotics, testing for bacterial cultures, or antioxidant supplements to reduce ROS-induced sperm DNA fragmentation and improve their chances of fertility. The WHO guidelines for leukocytospermia may need to be revised accordingly.

1 January 2014 in Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Ashok AgarwalAshok Agarwal
Ashok Agarwal
RSRakesh K Sharma
Rakesh K Sharma
RSReecha Sharma
Reecha Sharma
MAMourad ASSIDI
Mourad ASSIDI
AAAdel M Abuzenadah
Adel M Abuzenadah
ESEdmund Sabanegh
Edmund Sabanegh
A routine semen analysis is a first step in the laboratory evaluation of the infertile male. In addition, other tests such as measurement of reactive oxygen species can provide additional information regarding the etiology of male infertility. The objective of this study was to investigate the association of semen parameters with reactive oxygen species (ROS) in two groups: healthy donors of unproven and proven fertility and infertile men. In addition, we sought to establish an ROS cutoff value in seminal plasma at which a patient may be predicted to be infertile.

22 May 2022 in Cells
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MAMourad ASSIDI
Mourad ASSIDI
Male infertility is an increasing and serious medical concern, though the mechanism remains poorly understood. Impaired male reproductive function affects approximately half of infertile couples worldwide. Multiple factors related to the environment, genetics, age, and comorbidities have been associated with impaired sperm function. Present-day clinicians rely primarily on standard semen analysis to diagnose male reproductive potential and develop treatment strategies. To address sperm quality assessment bias and enhance analysis accuracy, the World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended standardized sperm testing; however, conventional diagnostic and therapeutic options for male infertility, including physical examination and semen standard analysis, remain ineffective in relieving the associated social burden. Instead, assisted reproductive techniques are becoming the primary therapeutic approach. In the post-genomic era, multiomics technologies that deeply interrogate the genome, transcriptome, proteome, and/or the epigenome, even at single-cell level, besides the breakthroughs in robotic surgery, stem cell therapy, and big data, offer promises towards solving semen quality deterioration and male factor infertility. This review highlights the complex etiology of male infertility, especially the roles of lifestyle and environmental factors, and discusses advanced technologies/methodologies used in characterizing its pathophysiology. A comprehensive combination of these innovative approaches in a global and multi-centric setting and fulfilling the suitable ethical consent could ensure optimal reproductive and developmental outcomes. These combinatorial approaches should allow for the development of diagnostic markers, molecular stratification classes, and personalized treatment strategies. Since lifestyle choices and environmental factors influence male fertility, their integration in any comprehensive approach is required for safe, proactive, cost-effective, and noninvasive precision male infertility theranostics that are affordable, accessible, and facilitate couples realizing their procreation dream.