Ika Hesti Agustin

Mrs. Ika Hesti Agustin


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 November 2017 in Far East Journal of Mathematical Sciences (FJMS)
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
IAIka Hesti Agustin
Ika Hesti Agustin
MHMoh. Hasan
Moh. Hasan
DADafik
Dafik
RARidho Alfarisi
Ridho Alfarisi
RPR. M. Prihandini
R. M. Prihandini

1 August 2019 in Journal of Physics: Conference Series
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
PDF file
RARidho Alfarisi
Ridho Alfarisi
DDDafik Dafik
Dafik Dafik
RPR.M. Prihandini
R.M. Prihandini
RAR. Adawiyah
R. Adawiyah
EAE. R. Albirri
E. R. Albirri
IAIka Hesti Agustin
Ika Hesti Agustin

22 November 2017 in Far East Journal of Mathematical Sciences (FJMS)
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DDDafik Dafik
Dafik Dafik
IAIka Hesti Agustin
Ika Hesti Agustin
SUSurahmat
Surahmat
RARidho Alfarisi
Ridho Alfarisi
SSSyafrizal Sy
Syafrizal Sy

7 June 2017 in Journal of Physics: Conference Series
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
PDF file
AGA.W. Gembong
A.W. Gembong
SSSlamin Slamin
Slamin Slamin
DDDafik Dafik
Dafik Dafik
IAIka Hesti Agustin
Ika Hesti Agustin
Let G = (V, E) be a simple, nontrivial, finite, connected and undirected graph. For an integer 1 ≤ k ≤ diam(G), a distance k-dominating set of a connected graph G is a set S of vertices of G such that every vertex of V (G)\S is at distance at most k from some vertex of S. The k-domination number, denoted by γ k (G), of G is the minimum cardinality of a k-dominating set of G. In this paper, we improve the lower bound on the distance domination number of G regarding to the diameter and minimum degree as well as the upper bound regarding to the order and minimum k distance neighbourhood. In addition, we determine the bound of distance domination number of edge comb product graph.

27 April 2018 in Journal of Physics: Conference Series
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
PDF file
IAIka Hesti Agustin
Ika Hesti Agustin
MHMoh. Hasan
Moh. Hasan
DDDafik Dafik
Dafik Dafik
RARidho Alfarisi
Ridho Alfarisi
AKArika Indah Kristiana
Arika Indah Kristiana
RPR. M. Prihandini
R. M. Prihandini

21 September 2018
Verified
Conference Paper
Closed access
PDF file
EKElsa Yuli Kurniawati
Elsa Yuli Kurniawati
IAIka Hesti Agustin
Ika Hesti Agustin
DADafik
Dafik
RARidho Alfarisi
Ridho Alfarisi
MAMarsidi
Marsidi
A total labeling of simple and connected graph G(V, E) is said to be local antimagic total edge labeling if a bijection f : V(G) ∪ E(G) → {1, 2, 3, …, |V(G)| + |E(G)|}, wt (e1) ≠ wt (e2) for any two adjacent edges e1 and e2, where for e = uv ∈ G, wt (e) = f (u) + f (uv) + f (v). The local antimagic total edge labeling induces a proper edge coloring of G if each edge e is assigned the color wt(e). The minimum number of local antimagic total edge chromatic number of G denoted by γleat(G), is the distinct induced by edge labels over all local antimagic total labeling of G. In this paper we study the existence of local edge antimagic total chromatic number of amalgamation of some special graphs namely amal(Pn, v, m), amal(Cn, v, m),amal(Fn, v, m) and amal(S n, v, m).