Giuseppe Masucci

Prof. Dr. Giuseppe Masucci

Karolinska Insitutet, department of oncology and pathology
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2018 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FPFranck Pagès
Franck Pagès
BMBernhard Mlecnik
Bernhard Mlecnik
FMFlorence Marliot
Florence Marliot
GBGabriela Bindea
Gabriela Bindea
FOFang-Shu Ou
Fang-Shu Ou
JGJerome Galon
Jerome Galon

3 October 2013 in The Journal of Pathology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JGJerome Galon
Jerome Galon
BMBernhard Mlecnik
Bernhard Mlecnik
GBGabriela Bindea
Gabriela Bindea
HAHelen K Angell
Helen K Angell
ABAnne Berger
Anne Berger
FPFranck Pagès
Franck Pagès
The American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (AJCC/UICC) TNM staging system provides the most reliable guidelines for the routine prognostication and treatment of colorectal carcinoma. This traditional tumour staging summarizes data on tumour burden (T), the presence of cancer cells in draining and regional lymph nodes (N) and evidence for distant metastases (M). However, it is now recognized that the clinical outcome can vary significantly among patients within the same stage. The current classification provides limited prognostic information and does not predict response to therapy. Multiple ways to classify cancer and to distinguish different subtypes of colorectal cancer have been proposed, including morphology, cell origin, molecular pathways, mutation status and gene expression‐based stratification. These parameters rely on tumour‐cell characteristics. Extensive literature has investigated the host immune response against cancer and demonstrated the prognostic impact of the in situ immune cell infiltrate in tumours. A methodology named ‘Immunoscore’ has been defined to quantify the in situ immune infiltrate. In colorectal cancer, the Immunoscore may add to the significance of the current AJCC/UICC TNM classification, since it has been demonstrated to be a prognostic factor superior to the AJCC/UICC TNM classification. An international consortium has been initiated to validate and promote the Immunoscore in routine clinical settings. The results of this international consortium may result in the implementation of the Immunoscore as a new component for the classification of cancer, designated TNM‐I (TNM‐Immune). © 2013 The Authors. Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

3 October 2012 in Journal of Translational Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JGJerome Galon
Jerome Galon
FPFranck Pagès
Franck Pagès
FMFrancesco Marincola
Francesco Marincola
HAHelen K Angell
Helen K Angell
MTMagdalena Thurin
Magdalena Thurin
BFBernard A Fox
Bernard A Fox
Prediction of clinical outcome in cancer is usually achieved by histopathological evaluation of tissue samples obtained during surgical resection of the primary tumor. Traditional tumor staging (AJCC/UICC-TNM classification) summarizes data on tumor burden (T), presence of cancer cells in draining and regional lymph nodes (N) and evidence for metastases (M). However, it is now recognized that clinical outcome can significantly vary among patients within the same stage. The current classification provides limited prognostic information, and does not predict response to therapy. Recent literature has alluded to the importance of the host immune system in controlling tumor progression. Thus, evidence supports the notion to include immunological biomarkers, implemented as a tool for the prediction of prognosis and response to therapy. Accumulating data, collected from large cohorts of human cancers, has demonstrated the impact of immune-classification, which has a prognostic value that may add to the significance of the AJCC/UICC TNM-classification. It is therefore imperative to begin to incorporate the ‘Immunoscore’ into traditional classification, thus providing an essential prognostic and potentially predictive tool. Introduction of this parameter as a biomarker to classify cancers, as part of routine diagnostic and prognostic assessment of tumors, will facilitate clinical decision-making including rational stratification of patient treatment. Equally, the inherent complexity of quantitative immunohistochemistry, in conjunction with protocol variation across laboratories, analysis of different immune cell types, inconsistent region selection criteria, and variable ways to quantify immune infiltration, all underline the urgent requirement to reach assay harmonization. In an effort to promote the Immunoscore in routine clinical settings, an international task force was initiated. This review represents a follow-up of the announcement of this initiative, and of the J Transl Med. editorial from January 2012. Immunophenotyping of tumors may provide crucial novel prognostic information. The results of this international validation may result in the implementation of the Immunoscore as a new component for the classification of cancer, designated TNM-I (TNM-Immune).

18 January 1999 in International Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MMMarie Marchand
Marie Marchand
NBNicolas van Baren
Nicolas van Baren
PWPatrick Weynants
Patrick Weynants
VBVincent Brichard
Vincent Brichard
ERElaine Rankin
Elaine Rankin
EJElke Jäger
Elke Jäger
Thirty‐nine tumor‐bearing patients with metastatic melanoma were treated with 3 subcutaneous injections of the MAGE‐3.A1 peptide at monthly intervals. No significant toxicity was observed. Of the 25 patients who received the complete treatment, 7 displayed significant tumor regressions. All but one of these regressions involved cutaneous metastases. Three regressions were complete and 2 of these led to a disease‐free state, which persisted for more than 2 years after the beginning of treatment. No evidence for a cytolytic T lymphocyte (CTL) response was found in the blood of the 4 patients who were analyzed, including 2 who displayed complete tumor regression. Our results suggest that injection of the MAGE‐3.A1 peptide induced tumor regression in a significant number of the patients, even though no massive CTL response was produced. Int. J. Cancer 80:219–230, 1999.

1 June 2010 in Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IPIsabel Poschke
Isabel Poschke
DMDimitrios Mougiakakos
Dimitrios Mougiakakos
JHJohan Hansson
Johan Hansson
GMGiuseppe Masucci
Giuseppe Masucci
RKRolf Kiessling
Rolf Kiessling
Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) have emerged as key immune modulators in various tumor models and human malignancies, but their characteristics in humans remain to be unequivocally defined. In this study, we have examined circulating CD14+HLA-DR−/low MDSC in 34 advanced malignant melanoma (MM) patients. Their frequency is significantly increased and associated with disease activity. Contrary to the common notion that MDSC are a heterogeneous population of exclusively immature cells, we find the coexpression of markers associated with mature phenotype. We show for the first time the overexpression of CD80, CD83, and DC-Sign in human MDSC. Further, increased levels of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (Stat3), an important regulator in MDSC development and function, were noted in MM-MDSC. Stat3 was altered toward an active, phosphorylated state in the HLA-DR− population of CD14+ cells and was more reactive to activating stimuli in patients. Importantly, inhibition of Stat3 abolished their suppressive activity almost completely. The described MM-MDSC use arginase in conjunction with other yet undefined mechanisms to suppress CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Several observations suggest a redox imbalance in MDSC and indicate an important role of Stat3-dependent oxidative stress in MDSC-mediated T-cell suppression. These results emphasize the diversity of MDSC in human cancer and provide potential targets for therapeutic interventions. Cancer Res; 70(11); 4335–45. ©2010 AACR.

1 June 1996 in European Journal of Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KKKoji Kono
Koji Kono
FSFlavio Salazar‐Onfray
Flavio Salazar‐Onfray
MPMax Petersson
Max Petersson
JHJohan Hansson
Johan Hansson
GMGiuseppe Masucci
Giuseppe Masucci
RKRolf Kiessling
Rolf Kiessling