Francesca Romana Mariotti

Dr. Francesca Romana Mariotti

Tumor Immunology Unit, IRCCS Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, 00146 Rome, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 November 2020 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LQLinda Quatrini
Linda Quatrini
Francesca Romana MariottiFrancesca Romana Mariotti
Francesca Romana Mariotti
EMEnrico Munari
Enrico Munari
NTNicola Tumino
Nicola Tumino
PVPaola Vacca
Paola Vacca
Lorenzo MorettaLorenzo Moretta
Lorenzo Moretta
In the last years, immunotherapy with antibodies against programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) has shown remarkable efficacy in the treatment of different types of tumours, representing a true revolution in oncology. While its efficacy has initially been attributed only to unleashing T cell responses, responsivity to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade was observed in some tumours with low Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) I expression and increasing evidence has revealed PD-1 surface expression and inhibitory function also in natural killer (NK) cells. Thus, the contribution of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy to the recovery of NK cell anti-tumour response has recently been appreciated. Here, we summarize the studies investigating PD-1 expression and function in NK cells, together with the limitations and perspectives of immunotherapies. A better understanding of checkpoint biology is needed to design next-generation therapeutic strategies and to improve the clinical protocols of current therapies.

1 August 2018 in Journal of Thoracic Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
EMEnrico Munari
Enrico Munari
GZGiuseppe Zamboni
Giuseppe Zamboni
GLGianluigi Lunardi
Gianluigi Lunardi
LMLuigi Marchionni
Luigi Marchionni
MMMarcella Marconi
Marcella Marconi
GBGiuseppe Bogina
Giuseppe Bogina
Determination of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression defines eligibility for treatment with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced NSCLC. This study was designed to better define which value across core biopsy specimens from the same case more closely reflects the PD-L1 expression status on whole sections and how many core biopsy specimens are needed for confident classification of tumors in terms of PD-L1 expression. We built tissue microarrays as surrogates of biopsies collecting five cores per case from 268 cases and compared PD-L1 staining results obtained by using the validated clone SP263 with the results obtained by using whole tumor sections. We found an overall positivity in 39% of cases at a cutoff of 1% and in 10% of cases at a cutoff of 50%. The maximum value across cores was associated with high concordance between cores and whole sections and the lowest number of false-negative cases overall. To reach high concordance with whole sections, four and three cores are necessary at cutoffs of 1% and 50%, respectively. Importantly, with 20% as the cutoff for core biopsy specimens, fewer than three cores showed high sensitivity and specificity in identifying cases with 50% or more of tumor cells positive for PD-L1 on whole sections. Specifically, for PD-L1 expression values of 20% to 49% on cores, the probabilities of a tumor specimen expressing PD-L1 in at least 50% of cells on a whole section were 46% and 24% with one and two biopsy specimens, respectively. An accurate definition of the criteria to determine the PD-L1 status of a given tumor may greatly help in selecting those patients who could benefit from anti-programmed cell death 1/PD-L1 treatment.

29 October 2005 in Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AMAntonello Mai
Antonello Mai
SMSilvio Massa
Silvio Massa
SLSiva Lavu
Siva Lavu
RPRiccardo Pezzi
Riccardo Pezzi
SSSilvia Simeoni
Silvia Simeoni
DSDavid A. Sinclair
David A. Sinclair

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EMEnrico Munari
Enrico Munari
Francesca Romana MariottiFrancesca Romana Mariotti
Francesca Romana Mariotti
LQLinda Quatrini
Linda Quatrini
PBPietro Bertoglio
Pietro Bertoglio
NTNicola Tumino
Nicola Tumino
Lorenzo MorettaLorenzo Moretta
Lorenzo Moretta
Immune evasion is a key strategy adopted by tumor cells to escape the immune system while promoting their survival and metastatic spreading. Indeed, several mechanisms have been developed by tumors to inhibit immune responses. PD-1 is a cell surface inhibitory receptor, which plays a major physiological role in the maintenance of peripheral tolerance. In pathological conditions, activation of the PD-1/PD-Ls signaling pathway may block immune cell activation, a mechanism exploited by tumor cells to evade the antitumor immune control. Targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis has represented a major breakthrough in cancer treatment. Indeed, the success of PD-1 blockade immunotherapies represents an unprecedented success in the treatment of different cancer types. To improve the therapeutic efficacy, a deeper understanding of the mechanisms regulating PD-1 expression and signaling in the tumor context is required. We provide an overview of the current knowledge of PD-1 expression on both tumor-infiltrating T and NK cells, summarizing the recent evidence on the stimuli regulating its expression. We also highlight perspectives and limitations of the role of PD-L1 expression as a predictive marker, discuss well-established and novel potential approaches to improve patient selection and clinical outcome and summarize current indications for anti-PD1/PD-L1 immunotherapy.

30 April 2019 in Frontiers in Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TITiziano Ingegnere
Tiziano Ingegnere
Francesca Romana MariottiFrancesca Romana Mariotti
Francesca Romana Mariotti
APAndrea Pelosi
Andrea Pelosi
CQConcetta Quintarelli
Concetta Quintarelli
BABiagio De Angelis
Biagio De Angelis
Lorenzo MorettaLorenzo Moretta
Lorenzo Moretta
CAR-NK cells may represent a valuable tool, complementary to CAR-T cells, in adoptive immunotherapy of leukemia and solid tumors. However, gene transfer to human NK cells is a challenging task, particularly with non-virus-based techniques. Here, we describe a new procedure allowing efficient electroporation-based transfection of plasmid DNA, including CAR and CCR7 genes, in resting or cytokine-expanded human NK cell populations and NK-92 cell line. This procedure may offer a suitable platform for a safe and effective use of CAR-NK cells in adoptive immunotherapy of cancer.

11 March 2019 in International Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NTNicola Tumino
Nicola Tumino
SMStefania Martini
Stefania Martini
EMEnrico Munari
Enrico Munari
FSFrancesca Scordamaglia
Francesca Scordamaglia
FBFrancesca Besi
Francesca Besi
Lorenzo MorettaLorenzo Moretta
Lorenzo Moretta
The tumor microenvironment (TM) contains a wide variety of cell types and soluble factors capable of suppressing immune responses. While the presence of NK cells in pleural effusions (PE) has been documented, no information exists on the presence of other innate lymphoid cell (ILC) subsets and on the expression of programmed cell death‐1 (PD‐1) in NK and ILC. The presence of ILC was assessed in PE of 54 patients (n = 33 with mesothelioma, n = 15 with adenocarcinoma and n = 6 with inflammatory pleural diseases) by cell staining with suitable antibody combinations and cytofluorimetric analysis. The cytokine production of ILC isolated from both PE and autologous peripheral blood was analyzed upon cell stimulation and intracytoplasmic staining. We show that, in addition to NK cells, also ILC1, ILC2 and ILC3 are present in malignant PE and that the prevalent subset is ILC3. PE‐ILC subsets produced their typical sets of cytokines upon activation. In addition, we analyzed the PD‐1 expression on NK/ILC by multiparametric flow‐cytometric analysis, while the expression of PD‐1 ligand (PD‐L1) was evaluated by immunohistochemical analysis. Both NK cells and ILC3 expressed functional PD‐1, moreover, both tumor samples and malignant PE‐derived tumor cell lines were PD‐L1+ suggesting that the interaction between PD‐1+ILC and PD‐L1+tumor cells may hamper antitumor immune responses mediated by NK and ILC.