Aims and Objectives: To investigate nurses’ intention in accepting COVID‐19 vaccination and the factors affecting their decision.Background: COVID‐19 vaccination has started in most European countries with healthcare personnel being the first group receiving the vaccine shots. Their attitude towards vaccination is of paramount significant as their role in the frontline could help in the awareness of general population.Methods: A study was conducted in Albania, Cyprus, Greece, Spain and Kosovo with the use of an online questionnaire. The Fear of COVID‐19 Scale was used. The STROBE checklist was followed for this cross‐sectional study.Results: Study population consisted of 1135 nurses. Mean age of the participants was 38.3 years, while most of them were female gender (84.7%) and married (53.1%). Acceptance of a safe and effective COVID‐19 vaccine was higher among Greek (79.2%) and Spanish (71.6%) nurses, followed by Cypriot (54%), Albanian (46.3%) and Kosovo (46.2%) nurses. Key factors for willingness to get vaccinated were male gender, living in a country with a high mortality rate in comparison with low mortality, being not infected with COVID‐19, having high level of knowledge about COVID‐19 vaccines and having been vaccinated for influenza in the last 2 years. Moreover, trusting the government and doctors regarding the information about the COVID‐19 and having high level of fear about this virus were key factors for willingness to get vaccinated.Conclusion: Vaccination of healthcare personnel is a crucial issue not only for their own safety but also for their patients’. Healthcare acceptance to get vaccinated can work as a role model for general population.Relevance to clinical practice: Gender, country, mortality rate, trust in government and health professionals and the level of fear were key factors that should be managed in clinical practice.

Diabetes self-management education helps to improve health outcomes and qualities of life for diabetic patients. This systematic review examines the effectiveness of several types of diabetes self-management education for patients at the early stages of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). A review of studies that have researched the use and impacts of health education on diabetic patients with T2DM was conducted using the electronic databases PubMed, Elsevier, JSTORE, Walters Kluwer, and the Cochrane Library between January 2017 and November 2022. We found 789 studies, and after selecting the PRISMA flowchart, we selected 19 studies, including those of 2512 adult patients diagnosed with T2DM. Biomedical results presented the pooled effect of a glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) of −0.64% and a fasting blood glucose (FBG) of −0.32. Emotional and social results and behavioral effects were evaluated in 10 and nine studies, respectively. The education and support of diabetic patients at the early stages of the disease impact various aspects, including the biomedical profile, lifestyle, emotional and social well-being, and anthropometric parameters. Among the factors that have been identified to enhance the effectiveness of educational interventions are the following: conducting individualized sessions (or at least in small groups of patients), extending the duration of interventions by at least 12 months, adopting a combined approach that includes both face-to-face and online components, and ensuring the involvement of a multidisciplinary healthcare team.

Background: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a chronic disease that significantly impacts individuals’ quality of life, affecting their physical, psychological, social, and environmental well-being. Objectives: This study investigates how self-care habits influence quality of life and key health indicators, such as glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), blood sugar levels, and body mass index (BMI), among newly diagnosed diabetic individuals in Vlore, Albania. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 332 individuals recently diagnosed with diabetes were surveyed between April and July 2024. Data were collected using the World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL-BREF) and the Summary Diabetes Self-Care Activity (SDSCA) surveys. Sociodemographic and clinical information, including age, education, occupation, duration of diabetes, HbA1c, and BMI, were collected through structured interviews and medical records. Descriptive and multivariate analyses were conducted to examine the relationships between self-care behaviors, sociodemographic factors, and quality of life. Results: The findings reveal a low quality of life, with a mean quality of life (QoL) score of 35.33 ± 8.25. Environmental domains were most affected, registering a low QoL score of 30.93 ± 9.04. Significant relationships between QoL, self-care practices, and sociodemographic factors and pathologic factors were found. The analysis indicated that distinct factors influenced various domains of quality of life. Physical health was associated with residence, comorbidities, BMI, and HbA1c, follow-up visits, dietary self-care and physical activity self-care. Psychological health correlated with residence, educational level, BMI, and HbA1c, follow-up visits, dietary, physical activity and foot self-care. Age, occupation, BMI, and physical activity self-care were linked to social relationships. Finally, environmental well-being was influenced by gender, residence, BMI, HbA1c, follow-up visits, and dietary and physical activity self-care. Conclusions: This study emphasizes the impact of sociodemographic and clinical factors on the quality of life of patients with T2D. Older age, lower education levels, comorbidities, increase in BMI and HbA1c levels, and inadequate self-care were associated with reduced quality of life. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions and policies that promote self-care and support for at-risk groups.

The number of people living with chronic conditions is increasing worldwide with most of these people receiving the needed healthcare services in primary healthcare (PHC) settings. The objective of this study was to explore the main challenges and barriers that PHC providers confront while treating multimorbid patients. This is a qualitative study utilising semi‐structured individual in‐depth interviews. The study took place in Vlora City, which is the biggest city located in south Albania. Τhe two biggest PHC centres of the city were enrolled. Purposive sampling method was used to recruit PHC practitioners. Main criteria of participation in the study were being fully employed at the enrolled primary care centres, having worked for at least 1 year and to deal with multimorbid patients in daily practice. Data collection took place from September 2019 to January 2020. In total, 36 semi‐structured interviews took place with 23 (63.9%) nurses and 12 (33.3%) physicians (general practitioners/family doctors). Communication problems and disputes, lack of materials/equipment and the inappropriate infrastructure, miscommunication and problems in doctor–nurse relationships, coordination problems, lack of protocols and problems in the referral system were reported as the main challenges and barriers that the PHC personnel confront. The findings of this study are critical in understanding challenges that PHC personnel face when dealing with multimorbid patients in PHC settings. The emerged knowledge contributes significantly in a better understanding of the actual situation and to inform health policy makers on how to deal with the existing problems.