Peng Chen

Dr. Peng Chen

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 July 2016 in GPS Solutions
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PCPeng Chen
Peng Chen
YYYibin Yao
Yibin Yao
WYWanqiang Yao
Wanqiang Yao

1 January 2020 in Advances In Space Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PCPeng Chen
Peng Chen
Hang LiuHang Liu
Hang Liu
YMYongchao Ma
Yongchao Ma
NZNaiquan Zheng
Naiquan Zheng

20 April 2020 in Earth and Space Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PCPeng Chen
Peng Chen
YMYongchao Ma
Yongchao Ma
Hang LiuHang Liu
Hang Liu
NZNaiquan Zheng
Naiquan Zheng
Tropospheric delay error is independent of the signal's frequency and has strong spatiotemporal variation. It is one of the most severe error sources of satellite navigation and spatial measurement. In view of the limitation of global zenith tropospheric delay (GZTD) model considering the altitude coefficient β as a constant and ignoring its spatiotemporal variation, this paper analyzes the spatiotemporal distribution of zenith tropospheric delay (ZTD) with altitude variation coefficient β based on the meteorological reanalysis data provided by the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasting from 2011 to 2015. The global altitude coefficient β model is established by using the trigonometric function and seventh‐order spherical harmonics function model, and then the global tropospheric delay model R_GZTD (reconstruction GZTD) is reconstructed by using Gbeta (Global beta β) model. The R_GZTD model gives high‐accuracy global distribution of tropospheric delays without meteorological parameters. The results show that the internal accuracy of the R_GZTD model is 3.22 cm, which has a good fitting effect. This paper uses the tropospheric delay products in 2016–2017 provided by the International GNSS Service, the tropospheric delay calculated by the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasting reanalysis data, and the radiosonde ZTD data in 2016–2017 as external compliance check data. The results show that the accuracy of the R_GZTD model is better than that of the GZTD model, UNB3m model, and the global pressure and temperature 2 wet model in the global and regional scope. Especially in areas with a higher altitude, the correction effect of the R_GZTD model is more significant. The root‐mean‐square error is 8.5% smaller than that of the GZTD model in the range of 0–500 m, 14.6% smaller in the range of 500–1,000 m, 12.5% smaller in the range of 1,000–2,000 m, and 16.8% smaller in the range above 2,000 m. The accuracy with the increasement of height is due to the fact that the R_GZTD model takes account of the spatiotemporal variation of β.

1 February 2021 in Advances In Space Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZLZheng Li
Zheng Li
PCPeng Chen
Peng Chen
NZNaiquan Zheng
Naiquan Zheng
Hang LiuHang Liu
Hang Liu

1 August 2021 in Advances In Space Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NZNaiquan Zheng
Naiquan Zheng
PCPeng Chen
Peng Chen
ZLZheng Li
Zheng Li

21 July 2014 in Geophysical Journal International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PCPeng Chen
Peng Chen
WYWanqiang Yao
Wanqiang Yao
XZXuejun Zhu
Xuejun Zhu
Considering the drawback of existing global weighted mean temperature model, this paper uses 2006–2012 NCEP reanalysis data to establish global empirical model for mapping zenith wet delays onto precipitable water—GTm_N, takes the influence of half-year periodicity of Tm into account when modelling and estimate the initial phase of each cycle. In order to evaluate the precision of GTm_N, we use three different Tm data sets from the NCEP during 2013, 650 radiosonde stations and COSMIC occultation in 2011 to test this model. The results show that GTm_N has higher precision in both ocean and continental area in every moment of every day. The accuracy of GTm_N is higher than Bevis formulas and GTm_II models. In addition, the actual surface temperature is not required in GTm_N model, and it will have wide application in GPS meteorology.