Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains a major cause of mortality and morbidity in human liver transplant recipients. Anti-CMV therapeutics can be used to prevent or treat CMV in liver transplant recipients, but their toxicity needs to be balanced against the benefits. The choice of prevention strategy (prophylaxis or preemptive treatment) depends on the donor/recipient sero-status but may vary between institutions. We conducted a series of consultations and roundtable discussions with German liver transplant center representatives. Based on 20 out of 22 centers, we herein summarize the current approaches to CMV prevention and treatment in the context of liver transplantation in Germany. In 90% of centers, transient prophylaxis with ganciclovir or valganciclovir was standard of care in high-risk (donor CMV positive, recipient CMV naive) settings, while preemptive therapy (based on CMV viremia detected during (bi) weekly PCR testing for circulating CMV-DNA) was preferred in moderate- and low-risk settings. Duration of prophylaxis or intense surveillance was 3–6 months. In the case of CMV infection, immunosuppression was adapted. In most centers, antiviral treatment was initiated based on PCR results (median threshold value of 1000 copies/mL) with or without symptoms. Therefore, German transplant centers report similar approaches to the prevention and management of CMV infection in liver transplantation.

Improving long-term patient and graft survival after liver transplantation (LT) remains a major challenge. Compared to the early phase after LT, long-term morbidity and mortality of the recipients not only depends on complications immediately related to the graft function, infections, or rejection, but also on medical factors such as de novo malignancies, metabolic disorders (e.g., new-onset diabetes, osteoporosis), psychiatric conditions (e.g., anxiety, depression), renal failure, and cardiovascular diseases. While a comprehensive post-transplant care at the LT center and the connected regional networks may improve outcome, there is currently no generally accepted standard to the post-transplant management of LT recipients in Germany. We therefore described the structure and standards of post-LT care by conducting a survey at 12 German LT centers including transplant hepatologists and surgeons. Aftercare structures and form of cost reimbursement considerably varied between LT centers across Germany. Further discussions and studies are required to define optimal structure and content of post-LT care systems, aiming at improving the long-term outcomes of LT recipients.

The calcineurin inhibitor tacrolimus is included in most immunosuppressive protocols after liver transplantation. This retrospective, observational 24-month study investigated the tolerability of once-daily MeltDose^® prolonged-release tacrolimus (LCPT) after switching from twice-daily immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-Tac) in a real-world cohort of 150 patients with previous liver transplantation. No graft rejection or new safety signals were observed. Only 7.3% of patients discontinued LCPT due to side effects. In the overall patient population, median liver transaminases, total cholesterol, triglycerides, glucose, and HbA_1c remained constant after switching to LCPT. Total cholesterol significantly decreased (p ≤ 0.002) in patients with initially elevated levels (>200 mg/dL). A total of 71.8% of 96 patients maintained a glomerular filtration rate > 60 mL/min/1.73 m² throughout the study, while 44.7% of patients were classified as fast metabolizers and 55.3% as slow metabolizers. Median daily tacrolimus dose could be reduced by 50% in fast metabolizers and by 30% in slow metabolizers, while trough levels were maintained in the target range (4–6 ng/mL). In conclusion, our observational study confirmed previous evidence of good overall tolerability and a favorable outcome for the patients after switching from IR-Tac to LCPT after liver transplantation.

Background: Switching stable liver transplant (LT) recipients from twice-daily immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-Tac) to once-daily MeltDose^® extended-release tacrolimus (LCPT) has been proven safe and well tolerated. Moreover, the switch has been associated with enhanced treatment adherence, improvement of tremors, and preserved renal function. Here, we hypothesized that switching to LCPT early after LT may enhance long-term patient outcomes significantly. Methods: This single-center, observational study investigated the long-term safety of LCPT in a large cohort of LT recipients (n = 100). Allograft function, emerging adverse events, the incidence of rejection reactions, renal function, lipid and glucose metabolism, and treatment adherence were assessed over 24 months. Results: In 56% of patients, the switch was conducted within 4 weeks post-transplantation. Adverse events occurred in 90% of patients during the 24-month follow-up, including gastrointestinal complications (28%), neurological symptoms (28%), skin disorders (26%), metabolic disorders (22%), and fatigue (18%). Seven patients (7%) developed renal insufficiency, and five patients (5%) developed renal failure. Three episodes of chronic graft rejection reactions (3%) and a single transplant failure (1%) were observed over 24 months. LCPT was discontinued in 10 patients. Liver and renal function markers, blood lipids (cholesterol and triglycerides), and glucose levels remained stable over the 24-month follow-up. However, 58% of LT recipients had one of their liver function markers elevated at baseline (i.e., before the switch), 28% had low glomerular filtration rate (GFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m²), and 18% had high serum creatinine (>1.3 mg/dL). In these subgroups, the early switch to LCPT was associated with a significant decrease in liver enzymes (p < 0.001 for alanine transaminase; p = 0.032 for gamma-glutamyl transferase; and p < 0.001 for total bilirubin) and a significant decrease in serum creatinine levels (p < 0.001). Self-reported treatment adherence was good and consistent throughout the study. Conclusions: The early switch from IR-Tac to LCPT was safe and effective in our cohort and may be particularly beneficial for patients with suboptimal liver and renal function following LT.

Bei Erkrankungen des Gastrointestinaltraktes kann eine Rehabilitation sehr wichtig sein, um die Genesung zu unterstützen und die Lebensqualität zu verbessern. Eine fundierte Rehabilitation kann erheblich zum positiven Langzeitverlauf einer Erkrankung beitragen. Warum dabei die Wechselwirkungen zwischen biologischen, psychologischen und sozialen Faktoren zu berücksichtigen sind, wird in diesem Beitrag zusammengefasst. Article published online: 20 March 2026 © 2026. Thieme. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany