SATOSHI BABA

Dr. SATOSHI BABA

JCHO Tokyo Shinjuku Medical Center
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2012 in Spine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YOYasushi Oshima
Yasushi Oshima
ASAtsushi Seichi
Atsushi Seichi
KTKatsushi Takeshita
Katsushi Takeshita
HCHirotaka Chikuda
Hirotaka Chikuda
TOTakashi Ono
Takashi Ono
STSakae Tanaka
Sakae Tanaka
A retrospective comparative study. To investigate natural course and prognostic factors in patients with mild forms of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM), focusing on intramedullary increased signal intensity (ISI) on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Long-term natural course of mild forms of CSM, especially with ISI on magnetic resonance imaging, remains uncertain. Patients with CSM who visited our institution between 1992 and 2004 and did not undergo surgery at first visit were retrospectively reviewed. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) motor function Japanese Orthopedic Association scores of 3 or more in both upper and lower extremities and (2) cervical spinal cord compression with ISI on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. There were 45 patients, with a mean follow-up period of 78 months (range, 24-208). We investigated long-term natural history by setting the timing of conversion to surgery due to neurological deterioration as an end point. We further compared prognostic parameters between patients who converted to surgery and those who continued to be followed up nonsurgically. Sixteen patients gradually deteriorated and underwent decompression surgery, whereas 27 patients did not. Apart from these, 2 patients with acute spinal cord injury after minor trauma underwent surgery. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that 82% or 56% of patients did not require surgery 5 or 10 years after the initial treatment, respectively. As for prognostic factors, Cox proportional hazard analysis revealed that total cervical range of motion (hazard ratio: 3.25), segmental kyphosis in the maximum compression segment (hazard ratio: 4.51), and local slip (hazard ratio: 4.67) were statistically significant. Fifty-six percent of patients with clinically mild CSM with ISI had not deteriorated or undergone surgery at 10 years. Large range of motion, segmental kyphosis, and instability at the narrowest canal were considered to be adverse prognostic factors.

30 July 2015 in European Spine Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SATOSHI BABASATOSHI BABA
SATOSHI BABA
YOYasushi Oshima
Yasushi Oshima
TITomoyuki Iwahori
Tomoyuki Iwahori
YTYuichi Takano
Yuichi Takano
HIHirohiko Inanami
Hirohiko Inanami
Hisashi KogaHisashi Koga
Hisashi Koga

12 May 2014 in Journal of Neurological Surgery Part A: Central European Neurosurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KTKatsushi Takeshita
Katsushi Takeshita
HIHirohiko Inanami
Hirohiko Inanami
YTYuichi Takano
Yuichi Takano
HKHisashi Koga
Hisashi Koga
TITomoyuki Iwahori
Tomoyuki Iwahori
YOYasushi Oshima
Yasushi Oshima
Introduction Microendoscopic techniques through a unilateral paramedian approach or muscle-preserving techniques using a microscope have been reported as minimally invasive spinal decompression procedures for the cervical spine. In this study, we developed a novel technique, cervical microendoscopic interlaminar decompression (CMID) through a midline approach, for treating cervical compression myelopathy. Methods A total of 29 consecutive patients with single- or two-level cervical compression myelopathy were reviewed. For the single-level cases (e.g., C5–C6), a midline skin incision, ∼ 2 cm in length, was made at the spinal level to be decompressed (C5–C6) under fluoroscopic guidance. The nuchal ligament was longitudinally cut, and tips of the spinous processes (C5 and C6) were exposed. A 16-mm tubular retractor was inserted between the tips of the C5 and C6 spinous processes. A dome-like laminectomy of C5, partial laminectomy of the upper part of C6, and flavectomy were performed. For the two-level cases (e.g., C4–C5 and C5–C6), the decompression procedure was completed by splitting the spinous process (C5). Pre- and postoperative neurologic status was evaluated using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score. Neck and arm pain was also evaluated using a numerical rating scale (NRS). Results Overall, 10 patients underwent single-level decompression, and 19 patients underwent two-level decompression. The average age was 67 years (range: 40–83 years), and the mean follow-up period was 11 months (range: 4–14 months). The average pre- and postoperative JOA scores were 10.2 and 13.5, with a mean recovery rate of 49%. The mean preoperative and postoperative NRS scores were 3.5 and 1.5 for neck pain and 4.6 and 2.9 for arm pain, respectively. One patient showed transient mild weakness of the leg that recovered neurologically within a few weeks. No other postoperative complications were observed. Conclusion This procedure revealed good short-term surgical results. This technique has advantages including (1) a symmetrical orientation of the surgical field, (2) an intermuscular incision that minimizes blood loss and muscle trauma, and (3) the ability to safely complete the decompression procedure without retracting the cervical spinal cord compared with the unilateral approach. Although long-term surgical results are required, this technique is not only safe but also minimally invasive as a treatment for cervical compression myelopathy.

1 August 1996 in Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AKA. Kondo
A. Kondo
SATOSHI BABASATOSHI BABA
SATOSHI BABA
TIT. Iwaki
T. Iwaki
HHH. Harai
H. Harai
HKH. Koga
H. Koga
JTJ. Takamatsu
J. Takamatsu

7 November 2016 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JTJuichi Tonosu
Juichi Tonosu
HIHirohiko Inanami
Hirohiko Inanami
HOHiroyuki Oka
Hiroyuki Oka
JKJunji Katsuhira
Junji Katsuhira
YTYuichi Takano
Yuichi Takano
KMKo Matsudaira
Ko Matsudaira
To evaluate the usefulness of our original five questions in a medical interview for diagnosing discogenic low back pain (LBP), and to establish a support tool for diagnosing discogenic LBP. The degenerative disc disease (DDD) group (n = 42) comprised patients diagnosed with discogenic LBP associated with DDD, on the basis of magnetic resonance imaging findings and response to analgesic discography (discoblock). The control group (n = 30) comprised patients with LBP due to a reason other than DDD. We selected patients from those who had been diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis and had undergone decompression surgery without fusion. Of them, those whose postoperative LBP was significantly decreased were included in the control group. We asked patients in both groups whether they experienced LBP after sitting too long, while standing after sitting too long, squirming in a chair after sitting too long, while washing one’s face, and in the standing position with flexion. We analyzed the usefulness of our five questions for diagnosing discogenic LBP, and performed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to develop a diagnostic support tool. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics, except age, between the groups. There were significant differences between the groups for all five questions. In the age-adjusted analyses, the odds ratios of LBP after sitting too long, while standing after sitting too long, squirming in a chair after sitting too long, while washing one’s face, and in standing position with flexion were 10.5, 8.5, 4.0, 10.8, and 11.8, respectively. The integer scores were 11, 9, 4, 11, and 12, respectively, and the sum of the points of the five scores ranged from 0 to 47. Results of the ROC analysis were as follows: cut-off value, 31 points; area under the curve, 0.92302; sensitivity, 100%; and specificity, 71.4%. All five questions were useful for diagnosing discogenic LBP. We established the scoring system as a support tool for diagnosing discogenic LBP.

10 December 2020 in Medicina
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SATOSHI BABASATOSHI BABA
SATOSHI BABA
RSRyutaro Shiboi
Ryutaro Shiboi
JYJyunichi Yokosuka
Jyunichi Yokosuka
YOYasushi Oshima
Yasushi Oshima
YTYuichi Takano
Yuichi Takano
Hisashi KogaHisashi Koga
Hisashi Koga
Background and Objectives: Ossification of the ligamentum flavum (OLF) is a relatively common cause of thoracic myelopathy. Surgical treatment is recommended for patients with myelopathy. Generally, open posterior decompression, with or without fusion, is selected to treat OLF. We performed minimally invasive posterior decompression using a microendoscope and investigated the efficacy of this approach in treating limited type of thoracic OLF. Materials and Methods: Microendoscopic posterior decompression was performed for 19 patients (15 men and four women) with thoracic OLF with myelopathy aged between 35 to 81 years (mean age, 61.9 years). Neurological examination and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) were used to identify the location and morphology of OLF. The surgery was performed using a midline approach or a unilateral paramedian approach depending on whether the surgeon used a combination of a tubular retractor and endoscope. The numerical rating scale (NRS) and modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) scores were compared pre- and postoperatively. Perioperative complications and the presence of other spine surgeries before and after thoracic OLF surgery were also investigated. Results: Four midline and 15 unilateral paramedian approaches were performed. The average operative time per level was 99 min, with minor blood loss. Nine patients had a history of cervical or lumbar spine surgery before or after thoracic spine surgery. The mean pre- and postoperative NRS scores were 6.6 and 5.3, respectively. The mean recovery rate as per the mJOA score was 33.1% (mean follow-up period, 17.8 months), the recovery rates were significantly different between patients who underwent thoracic spine surgery alone (50.5%) and patients who underwent additional spine surgeries (13.7%). Regarding adverse events, one patient experienced dural tear, another experienced postoperative hematoma, and one other underwent reoperation for adjacent thoracic stenosis. Conclusion: Microendoscopic posterior decompression was applicable in limited type of thoracic OLF surgery including beak-shaped type and multi vertebral levels. However, whole spine evaluation is important to avoid missing other combined stenoses that may affect outcomes.