John McLennan

Prof. John McLennan

University of Utah
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 August 2017 in Resources
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YSYork Smith
York Smith
PKPankaj Kumar
Pankaj Kumar
John McLennanJohn McLennan
John McLennan
The availability of rare earth elements from primary resources has come into question in the last two decades. This has sparked various government and industry initiatives to examine potential rare earth element resources apart from virgin ore bodies. Geothermal fluids are potentially significant sources of valuable minerals and metals, while co-recovery with geothermal energy production would be an attractive sustainable system. In this work, we give a brief survey of data collected on rare earth element concentrations in geothermal fluids. A survey of methods and technologies for extracting rare earth elements from geothermal is discussed along with the feasibility of recovering rare earth elements from geothermal brines. Based on the findings of this study, rare earth element extraction from geothermal fluids is technically possible, but neither economically viable nor strategically significant at this time.

1 July 2021 in Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
OOOluwafemi John Omotilewa
Oluwafemi John Omotilewa
PPPalash Panja
Palash Panja
CVCarlos Vega-Ortiz
Carlos Vega-Ortiz
John McLennanJohn McLennan
John McLennan

1 September 2015 in Geothermics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
John McLennanJohn McLennan
John McLennan
IWI. Walton
I. Walton
JMJ. Moore
J. Moore
DBD. Brinton
D. Brinton
JLJ. Lund
J. Lund

9 November 2020 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PXPengju Xing
Pengju Xing
John McLennanJohn McLennan
John McLennan
JMJoseph Moore
Joseph Moore
A scientific injection campaign was conducted at the Utah Frontier Observatory for Research in Geothermal Energy (FORGE) site in 2017 and 2019. The testing included pump-in/shut-in, pump-in/flowback, and step rate tests. Various methods have been employed to interpret the in-situ stress from the test dataset. This study focuses on methods to interpret the minimum in-situ stress from step rate, pump-in/extended shut-in tests data obtained during the stimulation of two zones in Well 58-32. This well was drilled in low-permeability granitoid. A temperature of 199 °C was recorded at the well’s total depth of 2297 m relative to the rotary Kelly bushing (RKB). The lower zone (Zone 1) consisted of 46 m of the openhole at the toe of the well. Fractures in the upper zone (Zone 2) were stimulated between 2123–2126 m measured depths (MD) behind the casing. The closure stress gradient variation depended on the depth and the injection chronology. The closure stress was found to increase with the pumping rate/volume. This stress variation could indicate that poroelastic effects (“back stress”) and the presence of adjacent natural fractures may play an important role in the interpretation of fracture closure stress. Further, progressively increasing local total stresses may, consequently, have practical applications when moderate volumes of fluid are injected in a naturally fractured or high-temperature reservoir. The alternative techniques that use pump-in/flowback tests and temperature signatures provide a valuable perspective view of the in-situ stress measurements.

1 September 2018 in Geothermics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PAPranay Asai
Pranay Asai
PPPalash Panja
Palash Panja
RVRaul Velasco
Raul Velasco
John McLennanJohn McLennan
John McLennan
JMJoseph Moore
Joseph Moore

1 November 2018 in Fuel
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HZHaiyan Zhu
Haiyan Zhu
XTXuanhe Tang
Xuanhe Tang
QLQingyou Liu
Qingyou Liu
SLShujie Liu
Shujie Liu
BZBinhai Zhang
Binhai Zhang
John McLennanJohn McLennan
John McLennan