Eva Thorin

Prof. Eva Thorin

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2018 in Applied Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WLWanwu Li
Wanwu Li
HKHabiba Khalid
Habiba Khalid
ZZZhe Zhu
Zhe Zhu
RZRuihong Zhang
Ruihong Zhang
GLGuangqing Liu
Guangqing Liu
ETEva Thorin
Eva Thorin

1 April 2020 in Applied Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ASAubrey Shenk
Aubrey Shenk
MOMonica Odlare
Monica Odlare
ETEva Thorin
Eva Thorin
SSSebastian Schwede
Sebastian Schwede

1 June 2005 in Applied Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ETEva Thorin
Eva Thorin
HBHeike Brand
Heike Brand
CWChristoph Weber
Christoph Weber

1 August 2014 in Waste Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JLJohan Lindmark
Johan Lindmark
PEPer Eriksson
Per Eriksson
ETEva Thorin
Eva Thorin

19 April 2021 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ISIda Sylwan
Ida Sylwan
ETEva Thorin
Eva Thorin
Resource reuse has become an important aspect of wastewater management. At present, use of sludge in agriculture is one of the major reuse routes. Conventional municipal wastewater treatment does not involve any designated process for removal of heavy metals, and these distribute mainly between effluent and sludge. Enhanced removal of heavy metals during primary treatment may decrease the heavy metal concentrations in both effluent and sludge from secondary treatment and promote long-term reuse of secondary sludge. This review considers heavy metal occurrence and removal during primary settling, together with possible treatment technologies for heavy metal removal in primary settlers and their theoretical performance. The variation in total heavy metal concentrations and dissolved fraction in raw municipal wastewater points to a need for site-specific assessments of appropriate technologies for improved heavy metal removal. Studies examining the heavy metal speciation beyond dissolved/particulate are few. Missing or disparate information on process parameters such as hydraulic retention time, pH and composition of return flows makes it hard to generalize the findings from studies concerning heavy metal removal in primary settlers. Coagulation/flocculation and use of low-cost sorbents were identified as the most promising methods for enhancing heavy metal removal during primary settling. Based on the available data on heavy metal speciation and removal during primary settling, sorption technologies may be most effective for enhancing the removal of Cu and Ni, while coagulation may be efficient for Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, Zn and Hg removal (but not as efficient for Ni removal).

1 October 2018 in Applied Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ETEva Thorin
Eva Thorin
JOJesper Olsson
Jesper Olsson
SSSebastian Schwede
Sebastian Schwede
ENEmma Nehrenheim
Emma Nehrenheim