Venky Soundararajan

Dr. Venky Soundararajan

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 August 2021 in medRxiv
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
APArjun Puranik
Arjun Puranik
PLPatrick Lenehan
Patrick Lenehan
ESEli Silvert
Eli Silvert
MNMichiel J.M. Niesen
Michiel J.M. Niesen
JCJuan Corchado-Garcia
Juan Corchado-Garcia
VSVenky Soundararajan
Venky Soundararajan
Although clinical trials and real-world studies have affirmed the effectiveness and safety of the FDA-authorized COVID-19 vaccines, reports of breakthrough infections and persistent emergence of new variants highlight the need to vigilantly monitor the effectiveness of these vaccines. Here we compare the effectiveness of two full-length Spike protein-encoding mRNA vaccines from Moderna (mRNA-1273) and Pfizer/BioNTech (BNT162b2) in the Mayo Clinic Health System over time from January to July 2021, during which either the Alpha or Delta variant was highly prevalent. We defined cohorts of vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals from Minnesota (n = 25,589 each) matched on age, sex, race, history of prior SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing, and date of full vaccination. Both vaccines were highly effective during this study period against SARS-CoV-2 infection (mRNA-1273: 86%, 95%CI: 81-90.6%; BNT162b2: 76%, 95%CI: 69-81%) and COVID-19 associated hospitalization (mRNA-1273: 91.6%, 95% CI: 81-97%; BNT162b2: 85%, 95% CI: 73-93%). In July, vaccine effectiveness against hospitalization has remained high (mRNA-1273: 81%, 95% CI: 33-96.3%; BNT162b2: 75%, 95% CI: 24-93.9%), but effectiveness against infection was lower for both vaccines (mRNA-1273: 76%, 95% CI: 58-87%; BNT162b2: 42%, 95% CI: 13-62%), with a more pronounced reduction for BNT162b2. Notably, the Delta variant prevalence in Minnesota increased from 0.7% in May to over 70% in July whereas the Alpha variant prevalence decreased from 85% to 13% over the same time period. Comparing rates of infection between matched individuals fully vaccinated with mRNA-1273 versus BNT162b2 across Mayo Clinic Health System sites in multiple states (Minnesota, Wisconsin, Arizona, Florida, and Iowa), mRNA-1273 conferred a two-fold risk reduction against breakthrough infection compared to BNT162b2 (IRR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.39-0.64). In Florida, which is currently experiencing its largest COVID-19 surge to date, the risk of infection in July after full vaccination with mRNA-1273 was about 60% lower than after full vaccination with BNT162b2 (IRR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.24-0.62). Our observational study highlights that while both mRNA COVID-19 vaccines strongly protect against infection and severe disease, further evaluation of mechanisms underlying differences in their effectiveness such as dosing regimens and vaccine composition are warranted.

7 July 2020 in eLife
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
TWTyler Wagner
Tyler Wagner
FSFNU Shweta
FNU Shweta
KMKarthik Murugadoss
Karthik Murugadoss
SASamir Awasthi
Samir Awasthi
AVAj Venkatakrishnan
Aj Venkatakrishnan
VSVenky Soundararajan
Venky Soundararajan
Understanding temporal dynamics of COVID-19 symptoms could provide fine-grained resolution to guide clinical decision-making. Here, we use deep neural networks over an institution-wide platform for the augmented curation of clinical notes from 77,167 patients subjected to COVID-19 PCR testing. By contrasting Electronic Health Record (EHR)-derived symptoms of COVID-19-positive (COVIDpos; n = 2,317) versus COVID-19-negative (COVIDneg; n = 74,850) patients for the week preceding the PCR testing date, we identify anosmia/dysgeusia (27.1-fold), fever/chills (2.6-fold), respiratory difficulty (2.2-fold), cough (2.2-fold), myalgia/arthralgia (2-fold), and diarrhea (1.4-fold) as significantly amplified in COVIDpos over COVIDneg patients. The combination of cough and fever/chills has 4.2-fold amplification in COVIDpos patients during the week prior to PCR testing, in addition to anosmia/dysgeusia, constitutes the earliest EHR-derived signature of COVID-19. This study introduces an Augmented Intelligence platform for the real-time synthesis of institutional biomedical knowledge. The platform holds tremendous potential for scaling up curation throughput, thus enabling EHR-powered early disease diagnosis.

26 May 2020 in eLife
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PAPraveen Anand
Praveen Anand
APArjun Puranik
Arjun Puranik
MAMurali Aravamudan
Murali Aravamudan
AVAj Venkatakrishnan
Aj Venkatakrishnan
VSVenky Soundararajan
Venky Soundararajan
Molecular mimicry is an evolutionary strategy adopted by viruses to exploit the host cellular machinery. We report that SARS-CoV-2 has evolved a unique S1/S2 cleavage site, absent in any previous coronavirus sequenced, resulting in the striking mimicry of an identical FURIN-cleavable peptide on the human epithelial sodium channel α-subunit (ENaC-α). Genetic alteration of ENaC-α causes aldosterone dysregulation in patients, highlighting that the FURIN site is critical for activation of ENaC. Single cell RNA-seq from 66 studies shows significant overlap between expression of ENaC-α and the viral receptor ACE2 in cell types linked to the cardiovascular-renal-pulmonary pathophysiology of COVID-19. Triangulating this cellular characterization with cleavage signatures of 178 proteases highlights proteolytic degeneracy wired into the SARS-CoV-2 lifecycle. Evolution of SARS-CoV-2 into a global pandemic may be driven in part by its targeted mimicry of ENaC-α, a protein critical for the homeostasis of airway surface liquid, whose misregulation is associated with respiratory conditions.

1 June 2021 in Patterns
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KMKarthik Murugadoss
Karthik Murugadoss
ARAjit Rajasekharan
Ajit Rajasekharan
BMBradley Malin
Bradley Malin
VAVineet Agarwal
Vineet Agarwal
SBSairam Bade
Sairam Bade
SASankar Ardhanari
Sankar Ardhanari
The presence of personally identifiable information (PII) in natural language portions of electronic health records (EHRs) constrains their broad reuse. Despite continuous improvements in automated detection of PII, residual identifiers require manual validation and correction. Here, we describe an automated de-identification system that employs an ensemble architecture, incorporating attention-based deep-learning models and rule-based methods, supported by heuristics for detecting PII in EHR data. Detected identifiers are then transformed into plausible, though fictional, surrogates to further obfuscate any leaked identifier. Our approach outperforms existing tools, with a recall of 0.992 and precision of 0.979 on the i2b2 2014 dataset and a recall of 0.994 and precision of 0.967 on a dataset of 10,000 notes from the Mayo Clinic. The de-identification system presented here enables the generation of de-identified patient data at the scale required for modern machine-learning applications to help accelerate medical discoveries.

26 February 2021 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CPColin Pawlowski
Colin Pawlowski
APArjun Puranik
Arjun Puranik
HBHari Bandi
Hari Bandi
AVA. J. Venkatakrishnan
A. J. Venkatakrishnan
VAVineet Agarwal
Vineet Agarwal
VSVenky Soundararajan
Venky Soundararajan
Clinical studies are ongoing to assess whether existing vaccines may afford protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection through trained immunity. In this exploratory study, we analyze immunization records from 137,037 individuals who received SARS-CoV-2 PCR tests. We find that polio, Haemophilus influenzae type-B (HIB), measles-mumps-rubella (MMR), Varicella, pneumococcal conjugate (PCV13), Geriatric Flu, and hepatitis A/hepatitis B (HepA–HepB) vaccines administered in the past 1, 2, and 5 years are associated with decreased SARS-CoV-2 infection rates, even after adjusting for geographic SARS-CoV-2 incidence and testing rates, demographics, comorbidities, and number of other vaccinations. Furthermore, age, race/ethnicity, and blood group stratified analyses reveal significantly lower SARS-CoV-2 rate among black individuals who have taken the PCV13 vaccine, with relative risk of 0.45 at the 5 year time horizon (n: 653, 95% CI (0.32, 0.64), p-value: 6.9e−05). Overall, this study identifies existing approved vaccines which can be promising candidates for pre-clinical research and Randomized Clinical Trials towards combating COVID-19.

2 November 2021 in JAMA Network Open
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JCJuan Corchado-Garcia
Juan Corchado-Garcia
DZDavid Zemmour
David Zemmour
THTravis Hughes
Travis Hughes
HBHari Bandi
Hari Bandi
TCTudor Cristea-Platon
Tudor Cristea-Platon
VSVenky Soundararajan
Venky Soundararajan
As of April 2021, there have been more than 195 million cases of COVID-19 worldwide, with more than 4 million associated deaths.1 After the emergency use authorizations issued by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on February 27, 2021, more than 21 million doses of the Ad26.COV2.S COVID-19 vaccine (from Johnson & Johnson and Janssen) have been administered in the United States.2 This vaccine consists of a single-dose injection of a recombinant, replication-incompetent, human adenovirus type 26 vector encoding the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. A recent phase 3 trial has demonstrated the effectiveness (66.9% [95% CI, 59.0%-73.4%]) and safety profile of this vaccine.3 Self-resolving, mild to moderate adverse effects were common in participants who received the vaccine, and serious adverse effects occurred rarely, with a frequency comparable to that of placebo.