Mamohale Chaisi

Dr. Mamohale Chaisi

South African National Biodiversity Institute
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 November 2020 in Microorganisms
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Agatha KoloAgatha Kolo
Agatha Kolo
NCNicola E. Collins
Nicola E. Collins
KBKelly A. Brayton
Kelly A. Brayton
MCMamohale Chaisi
Mamohale Chaisi
Lucille BlumbergLucille Blumberg
Lucille Blumberg
MOMarinda Oosthuizen
Marinda Oosthuizen
DNA samples from 74 patients with non-malarial acute febrile illness (AFI), 282 rodents, 100 cattle, 56 dogs and 160 Rhipicephalus sanguineus ticks were screened for the presence of Anaplasma phagocytophilum DNA using a quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay targeting the msp2 gene. The test detected both A. phagocytophilum and Anaplasma sp. SA/ZAM dog DNA. Microbiome sequencing confirmed the presence of low levels of A. phagocytophilum DNA in the blood of rodents, dogs and cattle, while high levels of A. platys and Anaplasma sp. SA/ZAM dog were detected in dogs. Directed sequencing of the 16S rRNA and gltA genes in selected samples revealed the presence of A. phagocytophilum DNA in humans, dogs and rodents and highlighted its importance as a possible contributing cause of AFI in South Africa. A number of recently described Anaplasma species and A. platys were also detected in the study. Phylogenetic analyses grouped Anaplasma sp. SA/ZAM dog into a distinct clade, with sufficient divergence from other Anaplasma species to warrant classification as a separate species. Until appropriate type-material can be deposited and the species is formally described, we will refer to this novel organism as Anaplasma sp. SA dog.

1 December 2011 in Veterinary Parasitology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MCMamohale Chaisi
Mamohale Chaisi
KSKgomotso Penelope Sibeko-Matjila
Kgomotso Penelope Sibeko-Matjila
NCNicola E. Collins
Nicola E. Collins
FPFred T. Potgieter
Fred T. Potgieter
MOMarinda Oosthuizen
Marinda Oosthuizen

17 October 2013 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MCMamohale Chaisi
Mamohale Chaisi
MJMichiel E. Janssens
Michiel E. Janssens
LVLieve Vermeiren
Lieve Vermeiren
MOMarinda Oosthuizen
Marinda Oosthuizen
NCNicola E. Collins
Nicola E. Collins
DGDirk Geysen
Dirk Geysen
A quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) assay based on the cox III gene was evaluated for the simultaneous detection and discrimination of Theileria species in buffalo and cattle blood samples from South Africa and Mozambique using melting curve analysis. The results obtained were compared to those of the reverse line blot (RLB) hybridization assay for the simultaneous detection and differentiation of Theileria spp. in mixed infections, and to the 18S rRNA qPCR assay results for the specific detection of Theileria parva. Theileria parva, Theileria sp. (buffalo), Theileria taurotragi, Theileria buffeli and Theileria mutans were detected by the cox III assay. Theileria velifera was not detected from any of the samples analysed. Seventeen percent of the samples had non-species specific melting peaks and 4.5% of the samples were negative or below the detection limit of the assay. The cox III assay identified more T. parva and Theileria sp. (buffalo) positive samples than the RLB assay, and also detected more T. parva infections than the 18S assay. However, only a small number of samples were positive for the benign Theileria spp. To our knowledge T. taurotragi has never been identified from the African buffalo, its identification in some samples by the qPCR assay was unexpected. Because of these discrepancies in the results, cox III qPCR products were cloned and sequenced. Sequence analysis indicated extensive inter- and intra-species variations in the probe target regions of the cox III gene sequences of the benign Theileria spp. and therefore explains their low detection. The cox III assay is specific for the detection of T. parva infections in cattle and buffalo. Sequence data generated from this study can be used for the development of a more inclusive assay for detection and differentiation of all variants of the mildly pathogenic and benign Theileria spp. of buffalo and cattle.

1 October 2016 in Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ZKZamantungwa T. H. Khumalo
Zamantungwa T. H. Khumalo
HCHelen N. Catanese
Helen N. Catanese
NLNicole Liesching
Nicole Liesching
PHPaidashe Hove
Paidashe Hove
NCNicola E. Collins
Nicola E. Collins
KBKelly A. Brayton
Kelly A. Brayton
Bovine anaplasmosis caused by the intraerythrocytic rickettsial pathogenAnaplasma marginaleis endemic in South Africa.Anaplasma marginalesubspeciescentralealso infects cattle; however, it causes a milder form of anaplasmosis and is used as a live vaccine againstA. marginale. There has been less interest in the epidemiology ofA. marginalesubsp.centrale, and, as a result, there are few reports detecting natural infections of this organism. When detected in cattle, it is often assumed that it is due to vaccination, and in most cases, it is reported as coinfection withA. marginalewithout characterization of the strain. A total of 380 blood samples from wild ruminant species and cattle collected from biobanks, national parks, and other regions of South Africa were used in duplex real-time PCR assays to simultaneously detectA. marginaleandA. marginalesubsp.centrale.PCR results indicated high occurrence ofA. marginalesubsp.centraleinfections, ranging from 25 to 100% in national parks. Samples positive forA. marginalesubsp.centralewere further characterized using themsp1aSgene, a homolog ofmsp1α ofA. marginale, which contains repeats at the 5′ ends that are useful for genotyping strains. A total of 47 Msp1aS repeats were identified, which corresponded to 32A. marginalesubsp.centralegenotypes detected in cattle, buffalo, and wildebeest. RepeatAnalyzer was used to examine strain diversity. Our results demonstrate a diversity ofA. marginalesubsp.centralestrains from cattle and wildlife hosts from South Africa and indicate the utility ofmsp1aSas a genotypic marker forA. marginalesubsp.centralestrain diversity.

1 March 2018 in Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CBCharles Byaruhanga
Charles Byaruhanga
NCNicola E. Collins
Nicola E. Collins
DKDarryn L. Knobel
Darryn L. Knobel
ZKZamantungwa T.H. Khumalo
Zamantungwa T.H. Khumalo
MCMamohale Chaisi
Mamohale Chaisi
MOMarinda Oosthuizen
Marinda Oosthuizen

3 March 2018 in Veterinary Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PHPaidashe Hove
Paidashe Hove
ZKZamantungwa T. H. Khumalo
Zamantungwa T. H. Khumalo
MCMamohale Chaisi
Mamohale Chaisi
MOMarinda Oosthuizen
Marinda Oosthuizen
KBKelly A. Brayton
Kelly A. Brayton
NCNicola E. Collins
Nicola E. Collins
Bovine anaplasmosis is endemic in South Africa and it has a negative economic impact on cattle farming. An improved understanding of Anaplasma marginale and Anaplasma marginale variety centrale (A. centrale) transmission, together with improved tools for pathogen detection and characterisation, are required to inform best management practices. Direct detection methods currently in use for A. marginale and A. centrale in South Africa are light microscopic examination of tissue and organ smears, conventional, nested, and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assays, and a reverse line blot hybridisation assay. Of these, qPCR is the most sensitive for detection of A. marginale and A. centrale in South Africa. Serological assays also feature in routine diagnostics, but cross-reactions prevent accurate species identification. Recently, genetic characterisation has confirmed that A. marginale and A. centrale are separate species. Diversity studies targeting Msp1a repeats for A. marginale and Msp1aS repeats for A. centrale have revealed high genetic variation and point to correspondingly high levels of variation in A. marginale outer membrane proteins (OMPs), which have been shown to be potential vaccine candidates in North American studies. Information on these OMPs is lacking for South African A. marginale strains and should be considered in future recombinant vaccine development studies, ultimately informing the development of regional or global vaccines.