Patrick M. Finnegan

Dr. Patrick M. Finnegan

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

41Years (1986-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 June 2012 in New Phytologist
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EVErik J. Veneklaas
Erik J. Veneklaas
HLHans Lambers
Hans Lambers
JBJason Bragg
Jason Bragg
PFPatrick M. Finnegan
Patrick M. Finnegan
CLCatherine Lovelock
Catherine Lovelock
JRJohn A. Raven
John A. Raven

1 January 2012 in Frontiers in Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PFPatrick M. Finnegan
Patrick M. Finnegan
WCWeihua Chen
Weihua Chen
The two forms of inorganic arsenic, arsenate (AsV) and arsenite (AsIII), are easily taken up by the cells of the plant root. Once in the cell, AsV can be readily converted to AsIII, the more toxic of the two forms. AsV and AsIII both disrupt plant metabolism, but through distinct mechanisms. AsV is a chemical analog of phosphate that can disrupt at least some phosphate-dependent aspects of metabolism. AsV can be translocated across cellular membranes by phosphate transport proteins, leading to imbalances in phosphate supply. It can compete with phosphate during phosphorylation reactions, leading to the formation of AsV adducts that are often unstable and short-lived. As an example, the formation and rapid autohydrolysis of AsV-ADP sets in place a futile cycle that uncouples photophosphorylation and oxidative phosphorylation, decreasing the ability of cells to produce ATP and carry out normal metabolism. AsIII is a dithiol reactive compound that binds to and potentially inactivates enzymes containing closely spaced cysteine residues or dithiol co-factors. Arsenic exposure generally induces the production of reactive oxygen species that can lead to the production of antioxidant metabolites and numerous enzymes involved in antioxidant defense. Oxidative carbon metabolism, amino acid and protein relationships, and nitrogen and sulfur assimilation pathways are also impacted by As exposure. Readjustment of several metabolic pathways, such as glutathione production, has been shown to lead to increased arsenic tolerance in plants. Species- and cultivar-dependent variation in arsenic sensitivity and the remodeling of metabolite pools that occurs in response to As exposure gives hope that additional metabolic pathways associated with As tolerance will be identified.

26 August 2005 in Plant Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MRMiquel Ribas-Carbo
Miquel Ribas-Carbo
NTNicolas L. Taylor
Nicolas L. Taylor
LGLarry Giles
Larry Giles
SRSilvia Busquets Rius
Silvia Busquets Rius
PFPatrick M. Finnegan
Patrick M. Finnegan
JFJaume Flexas Flexas
Jaume Flexas Flexas
The effect of water stress on respiration and mitochondrial electron transport has been studied in soybean (Glycine max) leaves, using the oxygen-isotope-fractionation technique. Treatments with three levels of water stress were applied by irrigation to replace 100%, 50%, and 0% of daily water use by transpiration. The levels of water stress were characterized in terms of light-saturated stomatal conductance (gs): well irrigated (gs > 0.2 mol H2O m−2 s−1), mildly water stressed (gs between 0.1 and 0.2 mol H2O m−2 s−1), and severely water stressed (gs < 0.1 mol H2O m−2 s−1). Although net photosynthesis decreased by 40% and 70% under mild and severe water stress, respectively, the total respiratory oxygen uptake (Vt) was not significantly different at any water-stress level. However, severe water stress caused a significant shift of electrons from the cytochrome to the alternative pathway. The electron partitioning through the alternative pathway increased from 10% to 12% under well-watered or mild water-stress conditions to near 40% under severe water stress. Consequently, the calculated rate of mitochondrial ATP synthesis decreased by 32% under severe water stress. Unlike many other stresses, water stress did not affect the levels of mitochondrial alternative oxidase protein. This suggests a biochemical regulation (other than protein synthesis) that causes this mitochondrial electron shift.

15 April 2011 in Plant Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HLHans Lambers
Hans Lambers
PFPatrick M. Finnegan
Patrick M. Finnegan
ÉLÉtienne Laliberté
Étienne Laliberté
SPStuart J. Pearse
Stuart J. Pearse
MRMegan H. Ryan
Megan H. Ryan
EVErik J. Veneklaas
Erik J. Veneklaas

4 August 2015 in Nature Plants
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HLH. Lambers
H. Lambers
PFPatrick M. Finnegan
Patrick M. Finnegan
RJRicarda Jost
Ricarda Jost
WPWilliam | William Plaxton
William | William Plaxton
MSM.W. Shane
M.W. Shane
MSM. Stitt
M. Stitt

24 February 2010 in Annals of Botany
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XYXiao Juan Yang
Xiao Juan Yang
PFPatrick M. Finnegan
Patrick M. Finnegan
Phosphorus (P) is often a limiting mineral nutrient for plant growth. Many soils worldwide are deficient in soluble inorganic phosphate (Pi), the form of P most readily absorbed and utilized by plants. A network of elaborate developmental and biochemical adaptations has evolved in plants to enhance Pi acquisition and avoid starvation. Controlling the deployment of adaptations used by plants to avoid Pi starvation requires a sophisticated sensing and regulatory system that can integrate external and internal information regarding Pi availability. In this review, the current knowledge of the regulatory mechanisms that control Pi starvation responses and the local and long-distance signals that may trigger Pi starvation responses are discussed. Uncharacterized mutants that have Pi-related phenotypes and their potential to give us additional insights into regulatory pathways and Pi starvation-induced signalling are also highlighted and assessed. An impressive list of factors that regulate Pi starvation responses is now available, as is a good deal of knowledge regarding the local and long-distance signals that allow a plant to sense and respond to Pi availability. However, we are only beginning to understand how these factors and signals are integrated with one another in a regulatory web able to control the range of responses demonstrated by plants grown in low Pi environments. Much more knowledge is needed in this agronomically important area before real gains can be made in improving Pi acquisition in crop plants.