Gemma Sáez

Dr. Gemma Sáez

Faculty Education Building, Department of Psychology and Anthropology, University of Extremadura, 06006 Badajoz, Spain
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 August 2019 in British Journal of Social Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SGSarah J. Gervais
Sarah J. Gervais
Gemma SáezGemma Sáez
Gemma Sáez
ARAbigail R. Riemer
Abigail R. Riemer
OKOlivier Klein
Olivier Klein

29 May 2020 in Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Gemma SáezGemma Sáez
Gemma Sáez
ARAbigail R. Riemer
Abigail R. Riemer
RBRebecca L. Brock
Rebecca L. Brock
SGSarah J. Gervais
Sarah J. Gervais
Sexual objectification is a subtle manifestation of sexist discrimination and violence against women that involves seeing and treating women as sex objects of male sexual desire. The primary aim of this research was to connect sexual objectification experiences with heterosexual intimate partner violence. This set of studies examined the impact of sexual objectification on intimate partner violence for both the female victim (Study 1) and the male perpetrator (Study 2). Female (Study 1) and male (Study 2) participants were asked to rate the extent they are victims or perpetrators of sexual objectification experiences and intimate partner violence. Moreover, women’s self-silencing and men’s ascriptions of humanity and empathy (through empathic concern and perspective taking) toward their partner was assessed. The results of the first study (including 154 heterosexual women) showed that general sexual objectification victimization indirectly leads to higher psychological and physical violence through the internalization of self-silence schemas. The second study (including 165 heterosexual men) demonstrated a link between general sexual objectification perpetration and psychological and physical intimate partner violence. Moreover, the relation between men’s perpetration of objectification and intimate partner violence was mediated by ascriptions of humanity and empathic concern toward their female partner (but not through perspective taking toward her). Results of both studies demonstrate the effect of sexual objectification (as target or perpetrator) on global intimate partner violence and explain the different psychological mechanisms through which it takes place depending on the gendered perspective. Theoretical implications and practical considerations for interventions on intimate partner violence are discussed.

27 April 2016 in Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Gemma SáezGemma Sáez
Gemma Sáez
IVInmaculada Valor-Segura
Inmaculada Valor-Segura
FEFrancisca Expósito
Francisca Expósito
Sexual objectification as a form of sexist discrimination accounts for the higher prevalence of psychological problems among women. More specifically, sexual objectification manifests itself in different ways with different intensities, in turn affecting women’s psychological well-being differently. On one hand, experiences of body evaluation are more subtle and work by perpetuating sexist attitudes among women themselves. On the other hand, more explicit forms of sexual objectification (unwanted explicit sexual advances) are linked to higher levels of anxiety and lower levels of self-esteem. The first study, on a sample of 343 Spanish women, aims to analyze the consequences of different forms of sexual objectification on women’s psychological well-being and the effect of sexism and enjoyment of objectification on these consequences. The second study, on a sample of 144 Spanish women, focuses on analyzing the ideological variables that have an effect on response to acts of sexist discrimination. Both studies reveal the significance of the more subtle experiences of sexual objectification as a mechanism that plays a part in keeping women in a subordinate position, where they end up feeling that this process is positive or pleasing.

5 January 2019 in Sex Roles
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Gemma SáezGemma Sáez
Gemma Sáez
ARAbigail R. Riemer
Abigail R. Riemer
RBRebecca Brock
Rebecca Brock
SGSarah J. Gervais
Sarah J. Gervais


1 December 2021 in Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Manuel Ruiz MuñozManuel Ruiz Muñoz
Manuel Ruiz Muñoz
Gemma SáezGemma Sáez
Gemma Sáez
LVLaura Villanueva-Moya
Laura Villanueva-Moya
Francisca ExpósitoFrancisca Expósito
Francisca Expósito
The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between body shame and participation in sexting among adolescents by examining the mediational roles of social physique anxiety and misuse of social networking sites (SNSs). Four hundred thirty-nine adolescents completed self-report measures for assessing their levels of body shame, social physique anxiety, SNS addiction symptoms, and sexting participation. Female adolescents reported higher scores in body shame, social physique anxiety, and SNS addiction symptoms, whereas male adolescents reported higher participation in sexting behaviors. In addition, gender did not moderate the relationship between body shame and higher sexting behaviors. Finally, the results showed an indirect (but not a direct) association between body shame and sexting behaviors through social physique anxiety and SNS addiction symptoms. These findings provide empirical evidence for the development of sexting prevention programs that are focused on body acceptance with the aim of reducing body shame, social physique anxiety, and SNS addiction.