Jeffrey Hubbard

Dr. Jeffrey Hubbard

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 June 2020 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JHJeffrey Hubbard
Jeffrey Hubbard
TGThomas Gent
Thomas Gent
MHMarieke M. B. Hoekstra
Marieke M. B. Hoekstra
YEYann Emmenegger
Yann Emmenegger
Valerie MongrainValerie Mongrain
Valerie Mongrain
Paul FrankenPaul Franken
Paul Franken
Sleep-wake driven changes in non-rapid-eye-movement sleep (NREM) sleep (NREMS) EEG delta (δ-)power are widely used as proxy for a sleep homeostatic process. Here, we noted frequency increases in δ-waves in sleep-deprived mice, prompting us to re-evaluate how slow-wave characteristics relate to prior sleep-wake history. We identified two classes of δ-waves; one responding to sleep deprivation with high initial power and fast, discontinuous decay during recovery sleep (δ2) and another unrelated to time-spent-awake with slow, linear decay (δ1). Reanalysis of previously published datasets demonstrates that δ-band heterogeneity after sleep deprivation is also present in human subjects. Similar to sleep deprivation, silencing of centromedial thalamus neurons boosted subsequent δ2-waves, specifically. δ2-dynamics paralleled that of temperature, muscle tone, heart rate, and neuronal ON-/OFF-state lengths, all reverting to characteristic NREMS levels within the first recovery hour. Thus, prolonged waking seems to necessitate a physiological recalibration before typical NREMS can be reinstated.

27 November 2019 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CHCharlotte N. Hor
Charlotte N. Hor
JYJake Yeung
Jake Yeung
MJMaxime Jan
Maxime Jan
YEYann Emmenegger
Yann Emmenegger
JHJeffrey Hubbard
Jeffrey Hubbard
Paul FrankenPaul Franken
Paul Franken
The timing and duration of sleep results from the interaction between a homeostatic sleep–wake-driven process and a periodic circadian process, and involves changes in gene regulation and expression. Unraveling the contributions of both processes and their interaction to transcriptional and epigenomic regulatory dynamics requires sampling over time under conditions of unperturbed and perturbed sleep. We profiled mRNA expression and chromatin accessibility in the cerebral cortex of mice over a 3-d period, including a 6-h sleep deprivation (SD) on day 2. We used mathematical modeling to integrate time series of mRNA expression data with sleep–wake history, which established that a large proportion of rhythmic genes are governed by the homeostatic process with varying degrees of interaction with the circadian process, sometimes working in opposition. Remarkably, SD caused long-term effects on gene-expression dynamics, outlasting phenotypic recovery, most strikingly illustrated by a damped oscillation of most core clock genes, includingArntl/Bmal1, suggesting that enforced wakefulness directly impacts the molecular clock machinery. Chromatin accessibility proved highly plastic and dynamically affected by SD. Dynamics in distal regions, rather than promoters, correlated with mRNA expression, implying that changes in expression result from constitutively accessible promoters under the influence of enhancers or repressors. Serum response factor (SRF) was predicted as a transcriptional regulator driving immediate response, suggesting that SRF activity mirrors the build-up and release of sleep pressure. Our results demonstrate that a single, short SD has long-term aftereffects at the genomic regulatory level and highlights the importance of the sleep–wake distribution to diurnal rhythmicity and circadian processes.

1 February 2019 in Current Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KKKonstantinos Kompotis
Konstantinos Kompotis
JHJeffrey Hubbard
Jeffrey Hubbard
YEYann Emmenegger
Yann Emmenegger
APAurore Perrault
Aurore Perrault
MMMichel Mühlethaler
Michel Mühlethaler
Paul FrankenPaul Franken
Paul Franken
Rocking has long been known to promote sleep in infants and, more recently, also in adults, increasing NREM sleep stage N2 and enhancing EEG slow waves and spindles. Nevertheless, whether rocking also promotes sleep in other species, and what the underlying mechanisms are, has yet to be explored. In the current study, C57BL/6J mice equipped with EEG and EMG electrodes were rocked laterally during their main sleep period, i.e., the 12-h light phase. We observed that rocking affected sleep in mice with a faster optimal rate than in humans (1.0 versus 0.25 Hz). Specifically, rocking mice at 1.0 Hz increased time spent in NREM sleep through the shortening of wake episodes and accelerated sleep onset. Although rocking did not increase EEG activity in the slow-wave and spindle-frequency ranges in mice, EEG theta activity (6-10 Hz) during active wakefulness shifted toward slower frequencies. To test the hypothesis that the rocking effects are mediated through the vestibular system, we used the otoconia-deficient tilted (tlt) mouse, which cannot encode linear acceleration. Mice homozygous for the tlt mutation were insensitive to rocking at 1.0 Hz, while the sleep and EEG response of their heterozygous and wild-type littermates resembled those of C57BL/6J mice. Our findings demonstrate that rocking also promotes sleep in the mouse and that this effect requires input from functional otolithic organs of the vestibule. Our observations also demonstrate that the maximum linear acceleration applied, and not the rocking rate per se, is key in mediating the effects of rocking on sleep.

1 December 2013 in Sleep Medicine Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JHJeffrey Hubbard
Jeffrey Hubbard
ERElisabeth Ruppert
Elisabeth Ruppert
CGClaire-Marie Gropp
Claire-Marie Gropp
PBPatrice Bourgin
Patrice Bourgin

5 February 2019 in eLife
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MHMarieke Mb Hoekstra
Marieke Mb Hoekstra
YEYann Emmenegger
Yann Emmenegger
JHJeffrey Hubbard
Jeffrey Hubbard
Paul FrankenPaul Franken
Paul Franken
Sleep depriving mice affects clock-gene expression, suggesting that these genes contribute to sleep homeostasis. The mechanisms linking extended wakefulness to clock-gene expression are, however, not well understood. We propose CIRBP to play a role because its rhythmic expression is i) sleep-wake driven and ii) necessary for high-amplitude clock-gene expression in vitro. We therefore expect Cirbp knock-out (KO) mice to exhibit attenuated sleep-deprivation-induced changes in clock-gene expression, and consequently to differ in their sleep homeostatic regulation. Lack of CIRBP indeed blunted the sleep-deprivation incurred changes in cortical expression of Nr1d1, whereas it amplified the changes in Per2 and Clock. Concerning sleep homeostasis, KO mice accrued only half the extra REM sleep wild-type (WT) littermates obtained during recovery. Unexpectedly, KO mice were more active during lights-off which was accompanied with faster theta oscillations compared to WT mice. Thus, CIRBP adjusts cortical clock-gene expression after sleep deprivation and expedites REM-sleep recovery.

11 October 2011 in Journal of Sleep Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JCJuliette Chambe
Juliette Chambe
SLSoumia Laib
Soumia Laib
JHJeffrey Hubbard
Jeffrey Hubbard
CEChristine Erhardt
Christine Erhardt
ERElisabeth Ruppert
Elisabeth Ruppert
PBPatrice Bourgin
Patrice Bourgin
Summary: A few investigations have raised the question of a possible relationship between obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) and floppy eyelid syndrome (FES). FES is an easily inverted floppy eyelid with papillary conjunctivis, and is a subset of the general pathology, lax eyelid syndrome. The aim of the current study is to determine whether OSAS severity is associated with FES. One hundred and 27 consecutive subjects (aged 25–75 years) referred to the Strasbourg University Sleep Clinic with suspicion of OSAS were included. All patients underwent overnight ambulatory respiratory polygraphy, comprehensive ophthalmological examination and completed standard sleep questionnaires. OSAS severity was defined based on the patient’s obstructive apnoea–hypopnoea index (AHI). As expected, age, body mass index (BMI) and the proportion of males increased with OSAS severity. FES was observed in 15.8% of the subjects without OSAS, 25.8% of the total OSAS population and the frequency was significantly increased (40%) in patients with severe OSAS (AHI > 30 h−1). A significant correlation between OSAS severity and FES was found after adjustment for age, sex and BMI, using a principal component analysis (PCA). The multivariate analysis included clinical, polygraphic and comorbidity data and was followed by logistic regressions for the main components extracted from the PCA. In summary, our findings show an association between OSAS severity and FES and suggest that severe OSAS might be an independent risk factor for FES. These two disorders may share common biological determinants, such as tissue elasticity. Finally, clinicians should be aware of this association so that underlying OSAS or FES can be detected.