Charlotte E. Teunissen

Prof. Charlotte E. Teunissen

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2022 in The Lancet Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CTCharlotte E. Teunissen
Charlotte E. Teunissen
IVInge M W Verberk
Inge M W Verberk
ETElisabeth H Thijssen
Elisabeth H Thijssen
LVLisa Vermunt
Lisa Vermunt
OHOskar Hansson
Oskar Hansson
MCMarta del Campo
Marta del Campo

1 December 2009 in Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CTCharlotte E. Teunissen
Charlotte E. Teunissen
APaxel petzold
axel petzold
JBJ. L. Bennett
J. L. Bennett
FBF. S. Berven
F. S. Berven
LBL. Brundin
L. Brundin
FDF. Deisenhammer
F. Deisenhammer
There is a long history of research into body fluid biomarkers in neurodegenerative and neuroinflammatory diseases. However, only a few biomarkers in CSF are being used in clinical practice. One of the most critical factors in CSF biomarker research is the inadequate powering of studies because of the lack of sufficient samples that can be obtained in single-center studies. Therefore, collaboration between investigators is needed to establish large biobanks of well-defined samples. Standardized protocols for biobanking are a prerequisite to ensure that the statistical power gained by increasing the numbers of CSF samples is not compromised by preanalytical factors. Here, a consensus report on recommendations for CSF collection and biobanking is presented, formed by the BioMS-eu network for CSF biomarker research in multiple sclerosis. We focus on CSF collection procedures, preanalytical factors, and high-quality clinical and paraclinical information. The biobanking protocols are applicable for CSF biobanks for research targeting any neurologic disease.

9 December 2024 in Nature Reviews Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MHMichael Thomas Heneka
Michael Thomas Heneka
WFWiesje M. van der Flier
Wiesje M. van der Flier
FJFrank Jessen
Frank Jessen
JHJeroen Hoozemanns
Jeroen Hoozemanns
DTDietmar Rudolf Thal
Dietmar Rudolf Thal
SRSean-Patrick Riechers
Sean-Patrick Riechers

2 July 2021 in Brain
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JPJoana B Pereira
Joana B Pereira
SJShorena Janelidze
Shorena Janelidze
RSRuben Smith
Ruben Smith
NMNiklas Mattsson-Carlgren
Niklas Mattsson-Carlgren
SPSebastian Palmqvist
Sebastian Palmqvist
OHOskar Hansson
Oskar Hansson
Although recent clinical trials targeting amyloid-β in Alzheimer’s disease have shown promising results, there is increasing evidence suggesting that understanding alternative disease pathways that interact with amyloid-β metabolism and amyloid pathology might be important to halt the clinical deterioration. In particular, there is evidence supporting a critical role of astroglial activation and astrocytosis in Alzheimer’s disease. However, so far, no studies have assessed whether astrocytosis is independently related to either amyloid-β or tau pathology in vivo. To address this question, we determined the levels of the astrocytic marker GFAP in plasma and CSF of 217 amyloid-β-negative cognitively unimpaired individuals, 71 amyloid-β-positive cognitively unimpaired individuals, 78 amyloid-β-positive cognitively impaired individuals, 63 amyloid-β-negative cognitively impaired individuals and 75 patients with a non-Alzheimer’s disease neurodegenerative disorder from the Swedish BioFINDER-2 study. Participants underwent longitudinal amyloid-β (18F-flutemetamol) and tau (18F-RO948) PET as well as cognitive testing. We found that plasma GFAP concentration was significantly increased in all amyloid-β-positive groups compared with participants without amyloid-β pathology (P < 0.01). In addition, there were significant associations between plasma GFAP with higher amyloid-β-PET signal in all amyloid-β-positive groups, but also in cognitively normal individuals with normal amyloid-β values (P < 0.001), which remained significant after controlling for tau-PET signal. Furthermore, plasma GFAP could predict amyloid-β-PET positivity with an area under the curve of 0.76, which was greater than the performance achieved by CSF GFAP (0.69) and other glial markers (CSF YKL-40: 0.64, soluble TREM2: 0.71). Although correlations were also observed between tau-PET and plasma GFAP, these were no longer significant after controlling for amyloid-β-PET. In contrast to plasma GFAP, CSF GFAP concentration was significantly increased in non-Alzheimer’s disease patients compared to other groups (P < 0.05) and correlated with amyloid-β-PET only in amyloid-β-positive cognitively impaired individuals (P = 0.005). Finally, plasma GFAP was associated with both longitudinal amyloid-β-PET and cognitive decline, and mediated the effect of amyloid-β-PET on tau-PET burden, suggesting that astrocytosis secondary to amyloid-β aggregation might promote tau accumulation. Altogether, these findings indicate that plasma GFAP is an early marker associated with brain amyloid-β pathology but not tau aggregation, even in cognitively normal individuals with a normal amyloid-β status. This suggests that plasma GFAP should be incorporated in current hypothetical models of Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis and be used as a non-invasive and accessible tool to detect early astrocytosis secondary to amyloid-β pathology.

1 January 2017 in Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SESebastiaan Engelborghs
Sebastiaan Engelborghs
ENEllis Niemantsverdriet
Ellis Niemantsverdriet
HSHanne Struyfs
Hanne Struyfs
KBKaj Blennow
Kaj Blennow
RBRaf Brouns
Raf Brouns
CTCharlotte E. Teunissen
Charlotte E. Teunissen
Introduction: Cerebrospinal fluid collection by lumbar puncture (LP) is performed in the diagnostic workup of several neurological brain diseases. Reluctance to perform the procedure is among others due to a lack of standards and guidelines to minimize the risk of complications, such as post‐LP headache or back pain.Methods: We provide consensus guidelines for the LP procedure to minimize the risk of complications. The recommendations are based on (1) data from a large multicenter LP feasibility study (evidence level II‐2), (2) systematic literature review on LP needle characteristics and post‐LP complications (evidence level II‐2), (3) discussion of best practice within the Joint Programme Neurodegenerative Disease Research Biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's Disease and Biomarkers for Multiple Sclerosis consortia (evidence level III).Results: Our consensus guidelines address contraindications, as well as patient‐related and procedure‐related risk factors that can influence the development of post‐LP complications.Discussion: When an LP is performed correctly, the procedure is well tolerated and accepted with a low complication rate.

9 January 2024 in Nature Aging
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BTBetty Tijms
Betty Tijms
EVEllen M. Vromen
Ellen M. Vromen
OMOlav Mjaavatten
Olav Mjaavatten
HHHenne Holstege
Henne Holstege
LRLianne M. Reus
Lianne M. Reus
PVPieter Jelle Visser
Pieter Jelle Visser
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is heterogenous at the molecular level. Understanding this heterogeneity is critical for AD drug development. Here we define AD molecular subtypes using mass spectrometry proteomics in cerebrospinal fluid, based on 1,058 proteins, with different levels in individuals with AD (n = 419) compared to controls (n = 187). These AD subtypes had alterations in protein levels that were associated with distinct molecular processes: subtype 1 was characterized by proteins related to neuronal hyperplasticity; subtype 2 by innate immune activation; subtype 3 by RNA dysregulation; subtype 4 by choroid plexus dysfunction; and subtype 5 by blood–brain barrier impairment. Each subtype was related to specific AD genetic risk variants, for example, subtype 1 was enriched with TREM2 R47H. Subtypes also differed in clinical outcomes, survival times and anatomical patterns of brain atrophy. These results indicate molecular heterogeneity in AD and highlight the need for personalized medicine.