Aidan Davison

Dr. Aidan Davison


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

38Years (1989-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2012 in Landscape and Urban Planning
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JKJamie Barrie Kirkpatrick
Jamie Barrie Kirkpatrick
ADAidan Davison
Aidan Davison
GDG.D. Daniels
G.D. Daniels

1 June 2011 in Landscape and Urban Planning
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JKJamie Barrie Kirkpatrick
Jamie Barrie Kirkpatrick
GDG.D. Daniels
G.D. Daniels
ADAidan Davison
Aidan Davison

1 September 2016 in Environmental Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JBJason Byrne
Jason Byrne
CAChristopher Ambrey
Christopher Ambrey
CPChloe Portanger
Chloe Portanger
ALAlex Lo
Alex Lo
TMTony Matthews
Tony Matthews
ADAidan Davison
Aidan Davison

1 February 2018 in Landscape and Urban Planning
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JKJamie Barrie Kirkpatrick
Jamie Barrie Kirkpatrick
ADAidan Davison
Aidan Davison

1 August 2013 in Geoforum
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JKJamie Barrie Kirkpatrick
Jamie Barrie Kirkpatrick
ADAidan Davison
Aidan Davison
GDGrant D. Daniels
Grant D. Daniels

18 October 2013 in Higher Education Research & Development
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EPEmma Pharo
Emma Pharo
ADAidan Davison
Aidan Davison
HMHelen McGregor
Helen McGregor
KWKristin Warr
Kristin Warr
PBPaul Brown
Paul Brown
We report on the establishment of communities of practice at four Australian institutions and evaluate their effectiveness and durability as a means of building staff and institutional capacity for interdisciplinary teaching. A community of practice approach is a potentially valuable methodology for overcoming dynamics of fragmentation, isolation and competition within universities. The communities we established were anchored by a shared focus on the topic of climate change and they worked collaboratively to build relationships of trust and reciprocity between teachers in a wide range of disciplines. The aim of each community was to improve the teaching of climate change through enabling members to integrate diverse disciplinary perspectives, to teach collaboratively, to promote innovation through exchange and to demonstrate leadership within their institutions. The key factors that made our communities effective and durable are: (1) designation of two leadership roles, activator and facilitator, (2) provision for institutional autonomy in domesticating the model to fit local circumstances and (3) a pragmatic emphasis on opportunities for teaching innovation and leadership within existing administrative structures, teaching programs and workloads. We conclude that suitably designed and resourced communities of practice are a viable means of improving interdisciplinary teaching of complex problems by facilitating both staff development and institutional learning.