Daniela Greto

Dr. Daniela Greto

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2015 in Radiotherapy and Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SSSilvia Scoccianti
Silvia Scoccianti
BDBeatrice Detti
Beatrice Detti
DGDavide Gadda
Davide Gadda
DGDaniela Greto
Daniela Greto
IFIlaria Furfaro
Ilaria Furfaro
LLLorenzo Livi
Lorenzo Livi

9 September 2015 in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
IMIcro Meattini
Icro Meattini
CSCalogero Saieva
Calogero Saieva
LMLivia Marrazzo
Livia Marrazzo
LBLucia Di Brina
Lucia Di Brina
SPstefania pallotta
stefania pallotta
LLLorenzo Livi
Lorenzo Livi

18 September 2013 in Journal of Neuro-Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BDBeatrice Detti
Beatrice Detti
SSSilvia Scoccianti
Silvia Scoccianti
VCVanessa Di Cataldo
Vanessa Di Cataldo
EMEleonora Monteleone
Eleonora Monteleone
SCSamantha Cipressi
Samantha Cipressi
GBGiampaolo Biti
Giampaolo Biti

25 October 2011 in Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LLLorenzo Livi
Lorenzo Livi
IMIcro Meattini
Icro Meattini
CSCalogero Saieva
Calogero Saieva
CFCiro Franzese
Ciro Franzese
VCVanessa Di Cataldo
Vanessa Di Cataldo
GBGiampaolo Biti
Giampaolo Biti
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate prognostic factors of local and distant recurrence in patients diagnosed with T1a and T1b, lymph node‐negative breast carcinoma (BC) with emphasis on human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status.METHODS: The authors reviewed 704 women with T1aT1bN0M0 BC who received treatment at the Radiation‐Oncology Center of Florence University between November 2002 and December 2008. Patients with ductal carcinoma in situ or recurrent BC at presentation and patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy were excluded from the analysis.RESULTS: In total, 75 patients had HER2‐positive BC (10.7%). At a mean follow‐up of 4.9 years (standard deviation, 2.6 years; range, 0.5‐10.8 years), 19 events were identified, including 10 distant recurrences. Patients with HER2‐positive BC had worse distant recurrence‐free survival (DRFS) than patients with HER2‐negative BC (hazard ratio, 3.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.94‐14.69; P = .045). Negative hormone receptor (HR) status was associated significantly with worse DRFS (hazard ratio, 0.26; 95% confidence interval, 0.07‐0.93; P = .026). In multivariate analysis, younger age was the only significant risk factor for an event of recurrence (hazard ratio, 0.61;95% confidence interval, 0.20‐1.82; P = .029).CONCLUSIONS: The current results indicated that patients with T1a/T1b, lymph node‐negative BC have a low risk of distant and local recurrence, but younger age is a significant risk factor for events occurrence. Young women with HER2‐positive and HR‐negative status have a significant risk of distant recurrence and should be considered for future clinical trials with anti‐HER2 adjuvant therapy. Cancer 2011. © 2011 American Cancer Society.

1 February 2016 in Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DGDaniela Greto
Daniela Greto
SSS Scoccianti
S Scoccianti
ACA Compagnucci
A Compagnucci
CAC Arilli
C Arilli
MCM Casati
M Casati
LLLorenzo Livi
Lorenzo Livi

1 October 2012 in Journal of Chemotherapy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
IMIcro Meattini
Icro Meattini
LLLorenzo Livi
Lorenzo Livi
CSCalogero Saieva
Calogero Saieva
DFDavide Franceschini
Davide Franceschini
LMLivia Marrazzo
Livia Marrazzo
GBGiampaolo Biti
Giampaolo Biti
Background: Meningeal carcinomatosis (MC) is a rare complication in breast cancer (BC) with no efficient modality of treatment yet found; overall survival (OS) generally did not exceed six months. We reviewed the experience of the University of Florence focusing on prognostic factors and MC survival. Patients and methods: We analyzed 33 patients treated for MC from BC between 2002 and 2010. Results: Mean OS from MC diagnosis was 4·9 months. At survival analysis clinical stage emerged as the only statistical significant parameter (P = 0·009) among BC diagnosis features. Among MC diagnosis parameters, more than three metastases at diagnosis (P = 0·037), multimodality treatment (P = 0·014) and poor performance status (P = 0·003) reached the statistical significance. At multivariate analysis only performance status at MC diagnosis maintained the statistical significance (P = 0·0047; HR: 3·34; CI 95% 1·45–7·73). Conclusions: Our experience confirms that performance status is probably the most important prognostic factor in these patients. Multimodality approach is probably the best option.