Fieke Froeling

Dr. Fieke Froeling

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2021 in Gastroenterology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SDStephan B Dreyer
Stephan B Dreyer
RURosie Upstill-Goddard
Rosie Upstill-Goddard
VPViola Paulus-Hock
Viola Paulus-Hock
CPClara Paris
Clara Paris
ELEirini-Maria Lampraki
Eirini-Maria Lampraki
DCDavid K Chang
David K Chang
Background & Aims Continuing recalcitrance to therapy cements pancreatic cancer (PC) as the most lethal malignancy, which is set to become the second leading cause of cancer death in our society. The study aim was to investigate the association between DNA damage response (DDR), replication stress, and novel therapeutic response in PC to develop a biomarker-driven therapeutic strategy targeting DDR and replication stress in PC. Methods We interrogated the transcriptome, genome, proteome, and functional characteristics of 61 novel PC patient–derived cell lines to define novel therapeutic strategies targeting DDR and replication stress. Validation was done in patient-derived xenografts and human PC organoids. Results Patient-derived cell lines faithfully recapitulate the epithelial component of pancreatic tumors, including previously described molecular subtypes. Biomarkers of DDR deficiency, including a novel signature of homologous recombination deficiency, cosegregates with response to platinum (P < .001) and PARP inhibitor therapy (P < .001) in vitro and in vivo. We generated a novel signature of replication stress that predicts response to ATR (P < .018) and WEE1 inhibitor (P < .029) treatment in both cell lines and human PC organoids. Replication stress was enriched in the squamous subtype of PC (P < .001) but was not associated with DDR deficiency. Conclusions Replication stress and DDR deficiency are independent of each other, creating opportunities for therapy in DDR-proficient PC and after platinum therapy.

1 November 2025 in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JKJennifer J Knox
Jennifer J Knox
GOGrainne O'KAne
Grainne O'KAne
DKDaniel King
Daniel King
DLDaniel Laheru
Daniel Laheru
AHAmber N Habowski
Amber N Habowski
EJElizabeth M. Jaffee
Elizabeth M. Jaffee
PURPOSE: To assess modified folinic acid/leucovorin, fluorouracil, irinotecan, oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX [mFFX]) versus gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (GnP) in de novo metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and explore predictive biomarkers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to mFFX or GnP with exclusion of germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2 or PALB2 . The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) between arms with 0.3 significance. The per-protocol (PP) population included patients who received one dose of chemotherapy. Pretreatment biopsies underwent whole-genome/transcriptome sequencing and patient-derived organoid (PDO) development, providing correlate recommendations at a molecular tumor board and outcomes assessed according to RNA signatures (basal-like v classical). RESULTS: Of 160 patients randomly assigned (80 mFFX, 80 GnP), 140 patients were in the PP population (71 mFFX, 69 GnP), with median follow-up of 8.3 months. The median PFS was 4.0 months for mFFX versus 5.3 months for GnP (hazard ratio [HR], 1.37 [95% CI, 0.97 to 1.92]; P = .069) in intention-to-treat. Median overall survival (OS) was 8.5 months with mFFX and 9.7 months with GnP (HR, 1.57 [95% CI, 1.08 to 2.28]; P = .017). Genomic data were generated in 94%, transcriptomes in 74%, and PDOs in 50%. The median PFS for those with basal-like was 3.0 (mFFX) and 5.5 (GnP) months ( P = .17), and classical PDAC was 6.3 (mFFX) versus 5.4 (GnP) months ( P = .36). The median OS in basal-like was 7.5 (mFFX) and 8.9 (GnP) months ( P = .75) versus in classical OS was 9.7 (mFFX) and 13.9 (GnP) months ( P = .047). Overall, 75 (54%) of patients received second-line treatment, 33/75 (44%) correlate-guided. The median time on second-line treatment was only 2.1 months with a median OS of 5.4 months for a correlate-guided choice versus 4.4 months on a standard chemotherapy approach ( P = .45). CONCLUSION: In the phase II Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Signature Stratification for Treatment-01 (PASS-01) trial population, PFS was similar between GnP and mFFX; however, OS and safety trends favored GnP. The second-line setting appears inadequate to offer precision choices, given the short survival observed.

4 January 2021 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FFFieke Froeling
Fieke Froeling
RCRaffaella Casolino
Raffaella Casolino
APAntonio Pea
Antonio Pea
ABAndrew V. Biankin
Andrew V. Biankin
DCDavid K Chang
David K Chang
OPOn Behalf Of Precision-Panc
On Behalf Of Precision-Panc
Substantial progress in recent years has dramatically increased our knowledge of the molecular basis of cancer, revealing new potential therapeutic targets and paving the way for effective personalised medicine for the treatment of many tumour types. However, pancreatic cancer has been lagging behind in this success and continues to be one of the most lethal solid malignancies. Its molecular heterogeneity and the unselected design of the majority of clinical trials to date can in part explain the reason for our failure to make a significant change in the survival outcomes for patients with pancreatic cancer. A changing paradigm in drug development is required to validate the new molecular taxonomy and to rapidly translate preclinical discovery into clinical trials. Here, we review the molecular subtyping of pancreatic cancer, the challenges in identifying effective treatment regimens according to defined low-prevalence molecular subgroups and we illustrate a new model of translational therapeutic development that was established in the U.K. (Precision-Panc) as a potentially effective solution to improve outcomes for patients with pancreatic cancer.

1 June 2021 in ESMO Open
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RCR. Cortés-Charry
R. Cortés-Charry
LHL. Hennah
L. Hennah
FFFieke Froeling
Fieke Froeling
DSD. Short
D. Short
XAX. Aguiar
X. Aguiar
MSM.J. Seckl
M.J. Seckl
A human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) cut-off of ≤300 IU/l for starting actinomycin D (ActD) in post-molar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) patients developing methotrexate resistance (MTX-R) reduced the number of women needing toxic multi-agent chemotherapy (etoposide, MTX and ActD alternating weekly with cyclophosphamide and vincristine; EMA/CO) without affecting survival. Here we assess whether an increased hCG cut-off of ≤1000 IU/l spares more women EMA/CO. All post-molar GTN patients treated with first-line methotrexate and folinic acid (MTX/FA) were identified in a national cohort between 2009 and 2016. Data collected included age, FIGO score, the hCG levels at MTX-R, and treatment outcomes. In total, 609 GTN patients commenced treatment with MTX/FA achieving a complete response in 57% (348/609). Resistance developed in 25.1% (153/609) at an hCG ≤ 1000 IU/l and switching to ActD achieved remission in 92.8% without any major toxicity with the remaining 7.2% remitting on EMA/CO. Comparative analysis of patients switching at an hCG <100 versus 100-300 versus 300-1000 IU/l revealed a significant fall in the cure rate with second-line ActD from 97% (93/96) to 87% (34/39) to 78% (14/18), respectively, P = 0.009. However, by increasing the hCG cut-off from ≤300 to ≤1000 IU/l, 14 patients were spared EMA/CO chemotherapy. Moreover, in the present series, all post-molar GTN remain in remission. This study demonstrates that increasing the hCG cut-off from ≤300 to ≤1000 IU/l for choosing patients for ActD following MTX-R spares more women with GTN from the greater toxicity of EMA/CO without compromising 100% survival outcomes.

20 January 2025 in BMC Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Hemant M KocherHemant M Kocher
Hemant M Kocher
PSPeter Sasieni
Peter Sasieni
PCPippa Corrie
Pippa Corrie
MMMairead Mcnamara
Mairead Mcnamara
DSDebashis Sarker
Debashis Sarker
DCDavid K Chang
David K Chang
Background: Pancreatic cancer (PDAC: pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, the commonest form), a lethal disease, is best treated with surgical excision but is feasible in less than a fifth of patients. Around a third of patients presentlocally advanced, inoperable, non-metastatic (laPDAC), whose stadrd of care is palliative chemotherapy; a small minority are down-sized sufficiently to enable surgical excision. We propose a phase II clinical trial to test whether a combination of standard chemotherapy (gemcitabine & nab-Paclitaxel: GEM-NABP) and repurposing All Trans Retinoic Acid (ATRA) to target the stroma may extend progression-free survival and enable successful surgical resection for patients with laPDAC, since data from phase IB clinical trial demonstrate safety of GEM-NABP-ATRA combination to patients with advanced PDAC with potential therapeutic benefit. Methods: Patients with laPDAC will receive at least six cycles of GEM-NABP with 1:1 randomisation to receive this with or without ATRA to assess response, until progression or intolerance. Those with stable/responding disease may undergo surgical resection. Primary endpoint is progression free survival (PFS) defined as the time from the date of randomisation to the date of first documented tumour progression (response evaluation criteria in solid tumours [RECIST] v1.1) or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. Secondary endpoints include objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), safety and tolerability, surgical resection rate, R0 surgical resection rate and patient reported outcome measures (PROMS) as measured by questionnaire EQ-5D-5L. Exploratory endpoints include a decrease or increase in CA19-9 and serum Vitamin A over time correlated with ORR, PFS, and OS. Discussion: STARPAC2 aims to assess the role of stromal targeting in laPDAC. Trial registration: EudraCT: 2019–004231-23; NCT04241276; ISRCTN11503604.

29 May 2025 in British Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KHKatharine J. Herbert
Katharine J. Herbert
RURosie Upstill-Goddard
Rosie Upstill-Goddard
SDStephan B. Dreyer
Stephan B. Dreyer
SRSelma Rebus
Selma Rebus
CPChristian Pilarsky
Christian Pilarsky
DCDavid K Chang
David K Chang
Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains the most lethal cancer. While DNA damaging agents such as platinum and PARP inhibitors have derived clinical benefits, acquired resistance invariably develops. Hence there is an urgent need for novel therapeutic strategies to overcome acquired resistance. Methods: Clinically relevant resistance in PDAC patient-derived cell lines was achieved by extended exposure to chemotherapy agents. Synergy scoring, clonogenicity, flow cytometry, immunofluorescence, and transcriptomic analysis were used to investigate the efficacy of ATR (ceralasertib) and PARP (olaparib) inhibitors in overcoming acquired resistance. Results: Acquired resistance was associated with transcriptomic shifts in cell cycle checkpoint regulation, metabolic control, DNA damage response (DDR), programmed cell death, and the replication stress response. Combination treatment with ceralasertib, and olaparib was synergistic in all models of acquired resistance. Sequential use of ceralasertib prior to olaparib was highly effective at low dose for DDR proficient models, whereas DDR deficient models responded better with olaparib treatment first. Conclusions: We provide in vitro evidence of a novel therapeutic strategy to overcome acquired resistance to PARP inhibitor and platinum in PDAC, using sequential exposure to ceralasertib and olaparib. A sequential regimen should be investigated clinically to circumvent dose limiting toxicity seen in concurrent combinations.