Ben Hayes

Prof. Ben Hayes


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2009 in Journal of Dairy Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BHBen Hayes
Ben Hayes
PBP.J. Bowman
P.J. Bowman
ACA.J. Chamberlain
A.J. Chamberlain
MGMichael Goddard
Michael Goddard
A new technology called genomic selection is revolutionizing dairy cattle breeding. Genomic selection refers to selection decisions based on genomic breeding values (GEBV). The GEBV are calculated as the sum of the effects of dense genetic markers, or haplotypes of these markers, across the entire genome, thereby potentially capturing all the quantitative trait loci (QTL) that contribute to variation in a trait. The QTL effects, inferred from either haplotypes or individual single nucleotide polymorphism markers, are first estimated in a large reference population with phenotypic information. In subsequent generations, only marker information is required to calculate GEBV. The reliability of GEBV predicted in this way has already been evaluated in experiments in the United States, New Zealand, Australia, and the Netherlands. These experiments used reference populations of between 650 and 4,500 progeny-tested Holstein-Friesian bulls, genotyped for approximately 50,000 genome-wide markers. Reliabilities of GEBV for young bulls without progeny test results in the reference population were between 20 and 67%. The reliability achieved depended on the heritability of the trait evaluated, the number of bulls in the reference population, the statistical method used to estimate the single nucleotide polymorphism effects in the reference population, and the method used to calculate the reliability. A common finding in 3 countries (United States, New Zealand, and Australia) was that a straightforward BLUP method for estimating the marker effects gave reliabilities of GEBV almost as high as more complex methods. The BLUP method is attractive because the only prior information required is the additive genetic variance of the trait. All countries included a polygenic effect (parent average breeding value) in their GEBV calculation. This inclusion is recommended to capture any genetic variance not associated with the markers, and to put some selection pressure on low-frequency QTL that may not be captured by the markers. The reliabilities of GEBV achieved were significantly greater than the reliability of parental average breeding values, the current criteria for selection of bull calves to enter progeny test teams. The increase in reliability is sufficiently high that at least 2 dairy breeding companies are already marketing bull teams for commercial use based on their GEBV only, at 2 yr of age. This strategy should at least double the rate of genetic gain in the dairy industry. Many challenges with genomic selection and its implementation remain, including increasing the accuracy of GEBV, integrating genomic information into national and international genetic evaluations, and managing long-term genetic gain.

17 June 2019 in Nature Biotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Lee HickeyLee Hickey
Lee Hickey
AHAmber N. Hafeez
Amber N. Hafeez
HRHannah Robinson
Hannah Robinson
SJScott A. Jackson
Scott A. Jackson
SLSoraya C. M. Leal-Bertioli
Soraya C. M. Leal-Bertioli
BWBrande Wulff
Brande Wulff

1 June 2009 in Nature Reviews Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MGMichael Goddard
Michael Goddard
BHBen Hayes
Ben Hayes

7 February 2012 in PLOS Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JKJames W Kijas
James W Kijas
JLJohannes A. Lenstra
Johannes A. Lenstra
BHBen Hayes
Ben Hayes
SBSimon Boitard
Simon Boitard
LNLaercio R Porto Neto
Laercio R Porto Neto
IMInternational Sheep Genomics Consortium Members
International Sheep Genomics Consortium Members
Through their domestication and subsequent selection, sheep have been adapted to thrive in a diverse range of environments. To characterise the genetic consequence of both domestication and selection, we genotyped 49,034 SNP in 2,819 animals from a diverse collection of 74 sheep breeds. We find the majority of sheep populations contain high SNP diversity and have retained an effective population size much higher than most cattle or dog breeds, suggesting domestication occurred from a broad genetic base. Extensive haplotype sharing and generally low divergence time between breeds reveal frequent genetic exchange has occurred during the development of modern breeds. A scan of the genome for selection signals revealed 31 regions containing genes for coat pigmentation, skeletal morphology, body size, growth, and reproduction. We demonstrate the strongest selection signal has occurred in response to breeding for the absence of horns. The high density map of genetic variability provides an in-depth view of the genetic history for this important livestock species. During the process of domestication, mankind recruited animals from the wild into a captive environment, changing their morphology, behaviour, and genetics. In the case of sheep, domestication and subsequent selection by their animal handlers over thousands of years has produced a spectrum of breeds specialised for the production of wool, milk, and meat. We sought to use this population history to search for the genes that directly underpin phenotypic variation. We collected DNA from 2,819 sheep, belonging to 74 breeds sampled from around the world, and assessed the genotype of each animal at nearly 50,000 locations across the genome. Our results show that sheep breeds have maintained high levels of genetic diversity, in contrast to other domestic animals such as dogs. We also show that particular regions of the genome contain strong evidence for accelerated change in response to artificial selection. The most prominent example was identified in response to breeding for the absence of horns, a trait now common across many modern breeds. Furthermore, we demonstrate that other genomic regions under selection in sheep contain genes controlling pigmentation, reproduction, and body size.

13 July 2014 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HDHans Daetwyler
Hans Daetwyler
ACAurélien Capitan
Aurélien Capitan
HPHubert Pausch
Hubert Pausch
PSPaul Stothard
Paul Stothard
RBRianne van Binsbergen
Rianne van Binsbergen
BHBen Hayes
Ben Hayes

18 June 2013 in Nature Reviews Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NWNaomi R. Wray
Naomi R. Wray
JYJian Yang
Jian Yang
BHBen Hayes
Ben Hayes
APAlkes L. Price
Alkes L. Price
MGMichael Goddard
Michael Goddard
PVPeter M. Visscher
Peter M. Visscher