Eilis Hennessy

Prof. Eilis Hennessy

University College Dublin, Ireland
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

38Years (1989-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Finiki NearchouFiniki Nearchou
Finiki Nearchou
Clodagh FlinnClodagh Flinn
Clodagh Flinn
RNRachel Niland
Rachel Niland
SSSheena Siva Subramaniam
Sheena Siva Subramaniam
Eilis HennessyEilis Hennessy
Eilis Hennessy
The psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has been widely discussed during the past few months, with scholars expressing concern about its potential debilitating consequences on youth mental health. Hence, this research aimed to provide a systematic review of the evidence on the COVID-19 pandemic’s impact on youth mental health. We conducted a mixed methods integrated review to identify any empirical study that focused on young people ≤ 18 years old. Eight databases were systematically searched to identify studies of any type of research design. The selection procedure followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The protocol of this systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (protocol ID: CRD4202019375). Twelve studies deemed eligible for data extraction (n = 12,262). The findings show that COVID-19 has an impact on youth mental health and is particularly associated with depression and anxiety in adolescent cohorts. The quality appraisal indicated that all studies were of low or moderate methodological quality. The COVID-19 pandemic is affecting young people’s lives, and thus generating robust research evidence to inform policy decisions is essential. Hence, the methodological quality of future research should be drastically improved.

1 January 2002 in Journal of Pediatric Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CHCaroline M. Heary
Caroline M. Heary
Eilis HennessyEilis Hennessy
Eilis Hennessy
Objective: To review and synethize the research material on focus groups with children and adolescents and to provide guidelines for future development. Methods: Psychlit, Medline, and Cinahl electronic databases, as well as the reference lists of those articles consulted, were reviewed for information regarding focus groups with participants under the age of 18 years. Both empirical and methodological articles were part of this review. Results: We review the utility of focus groups for exploratory research, program evaluation, program development, and questionnaire construction or adaptation. Based on previous research, we provide guidelines for focus groups with children and adolescents and outline suggestions for future development. Conclusions: There is evidence to suggest that focus groups are a valuable means of eliciting children's views on health-related matters, given an appropriate research question. However, empirical research is required in order to investigate systematically the effect of different processes and variables on the final outcome of focus group interviews.

1 November 1989 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AGAdrian Grant
Adrian Grant
MJMarie-Therese Joy
Marie-Therese Joy
NONiall O'BRien
Niall O'BRien
Eilis HennessyEilis Hennessy
Eilis Hennessy
DMDermot Macdonald
Dermot Macdonald

23 May 2018 in Journal of Adolescence
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Finiki NearchouFiniki Nearchou
Finiki Nearchou
NBNiamh Bird
Niamh Bird
ACAudrey Costello
Audrey Costello
SDSophie Duggan
Sophie Duggan
JGJessica Gilroy
Jessica Gilroy
Eilis HennessyEilis Hennessy
Eilis Hennessy

1 September 2002 in European Journal of Psychology of Education
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SGSuzanne Guerin
Suzanne Guerin
Eilis HennessyEilis Hennessy
Eilis Hennessy

24 July 2012 in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
COClaire O’dRiscoll
Claire O’dRiscoll
CHCaroline Heary
Caroline Heary
Eilis HennessyEilis Hennessy
Eilis Hennessy
LMLynn McKeague
Lynn McKeague