Although glutamate is one of the most important excitatory neurotransmitters of the central nervous system, its excessive extracellular concentration leads to uncontrolled continuous depolarization of neurons, a toxic process called, excitotoxicity. In excitotoxicity glutamate triggers the rise of intracellular Ca²⁺ levels, followed by up regulation of nNOS, dysfunction of mitochondria, ROS production, ER stress, and release of lysosomal enzymes. Excessive calcium concentration is the key mediator of glutamate toxicity through over activation of ionotropic and metabotropic receptors. In addition, glutamate accumulation can also inhibit cystine (CySS) uptake by reversing the action of the CySS/glutamate antiporter. Reversal of the antiporter action reinforces the aforementioned events by depleting neurons of cysteine and eventually glutathione’s reducing potential. Various cell lines have been employed in the pursuit to understand the mechanism(s) by which excitotoxicity affects the cells leading them ultimately to their demise. In some cell lines glutamate toxicity is exerted mainly through over activation of NMDA, AMPA, or kainate receptors whereas in other cell lines lacking such receptors, the toxicity is due to glutamate induced oxidative stress. However, in the greatest majority of the cell lines ionotropic glutamate receptors are present, co-existing to CySS/glutamate antiporters and metabotropic glutamate receptors, supporting the assumption that excitotoxicity effect in these cells is accumulative. Different cell lines differ in their responses when exposed to glutamate. In this review article the responses of PC12, SH-SY5Y, HT-22, NT-2, OLCs, C6, primary rat cortical neurons, RGC-5, and SCN2.2 cell systems are systematically collected and analyzed.

Development of clinical-grade cell preparations is central to meeting the regulatory requirements for cellular therapies under good manufacturing practice-compliant (cGMP) conditions. Since addition of animal serum in culture media may compromise safe and efficient expansion of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) for clinical use, this study aimed to investigate the potential of two serum/xeno-free, cGMP culture systems to maintain long-term “stemness” of oral MSCs (dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) and alveolar bone marrow MSCs (aBMMSCs)), compared to conventional serum-based expansion. DPSC and aBMMSC cultures (n = 6/cell type) were established from pulp and alveolar osseous biopsies respectively. Three culture systems were used: StemPro_MSC/SFM_XenoFree (Life Technologies); StemMacs_MSC/XF (Miltenyi Biotek); and α-MEM (Life Technologies) with 15% fetal bovine serum. Growth (population doublings (PDs)), immunophenotypic (flow cytometric analysis of MSC markers) and senescence (β-galactosidase (SA-β-gal) activity; telomere length) characteristics were determined during prolonged expansion. Gene expression patterns of osteogenic (ALP, BMP-2), adipogenic (LPL, PPAR-γ) and chondrogenic (ACAN, SOX-9) markers and maintenance of multilineage differentiation potential were determined by real-time PCR. Similar isolation efficiency and stable growth dynamics up to passage 10 were observed for DPSCs under all expansion conditions. aBMMSCs showed lower cumulative PDs compared to DPSCs, and when StemMacs was used substantial delays in cell proliferation were noted after passages 6–7. Serum/xeno-free expansion produced cultures with homogeneous spindle-shaped phenotypes, while serum-based expansion preserved differential heterogeneous characteristics of each MSC population. Prolonged expansion of both MSC types but in particular the serum/xeno-free-expanded aBMMSCs was associated with downregulation of CD146, CD105, Stro-1, SSEA-1 and SSEA-4, but not CD90, CD73 and CD49f, in parallel with an increase of SA-gal-positive cells, cell size and granularity and a decrease in telomere length. Expansion under both serum-free systems resulted in “osteogenic pre-disposition”, evidenced by upregulation of osteogenic markers and elimination of chondrogenic and adipogenic markers, while serum-based expansion produced only minor changes. DPSCs retained a diminishing (CCM, StemPro) or increasing (StemMacs) mineralization potential with passaging, while aBMMSCs lost this potential after passages 6–7 under all expansion conditions. These findings indicate there is still a vacant role for development of qualified protocols for clinical-grade expansion of oral MSCs; a key milestone achievement for translation of research from the bench to clinics.

Stem cells from the apical papilla (SCAP) of human adult teeth are considered an accessible source of cells with angiogenic properties. The aims of this study were to investigate the endothelial transdifferentiation of SCAP, the secretion of pro- and antiangiogenic factors from SCAP, and the paracrine effects of SCAP when exposed to environmental stress to stimulate tissue damage. SCAP were exposed to serum deprivation (SD), glucose deprivation (GD), and oxygen deprivation/hypoxia (OD) conditions, individually or in combination. Endothelial transdifferentiation was evaluated by in vitro capillary-like formation assays, real-time polymerase chain reaction, western blot, and flow cytometric analyses of angiogenesis-related markers; secretome by antibody arrays and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA); and paracrine impact on human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) by in vitro transwell migration and capillary-like formation assays. The short-term exposure of SCAP to glucose/oxygen deprivation (GOD) in the presence, but mainly in deprivation, of serum (SGOD) elicited a proangiogenesis effect indicated by expression of angiogenesis-related genes involved in vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)/VEGFR and angiopoietins/Tie pathways. This effect was unachievable under SD in normoxia, suggesting that the critical microenvironmental condition inducing rapid endothelial shift of SCAP is the combination of SGOD. Interestingly, SCAP showed high adaptability to these adverse conditions, retaining cell viability and acquiring a capillary-forming phenotype. SCAP secreted higher numbers and amounts of pro- (angiogenin, IGFBP-3, VEGF) and lower amounts of antiangiogenic factors (serpin-E1, TIMP-1, TSP-1) under SGOD compared with SOD or SD alone. Finally, secretome obtained under SGOD was most effective in inducing migration and capillary-like formation by HUVECs. These data provide new evidence on the microenvironmental factors favoring endothelial transdifferentiation of SCAP, uncovering the molecular mechanisms regulating their fate. They also validate the angiogenic properties of their secretome giving insights into preconditioning strategies enhancing their therapeutic potential.

The present review summarizes recent advances in the transcriptional regulation of the human apolipoprotein genes, focusing mostly, but not exclusively, on in-vivo studies and signaling mechanisms that affect apolipoprotein gene transcription. An attempt is made to explain how interactions of transcription factors that bind to proximal promoters and distal enhancers may bring about gene transcription. The experimental approaches used and the transcriptional regulatory mechanisms that emerge from these studies may also be applicable in other gene systems that are associated with human disease. Understanding extracellular stimuli and the specific mechanisms that underlie apolipoprotein gene transcription may in the long run allow us to selectively switch on antiatherogenic genes, and switch off proatherogenic genes. This may have beneficial effects and may confer protection from atherosclerosis to humans.

This review provides experiments and putative mechanisms which underlie the transcription of the human apolipoprotein genes in vitro and in vivo. Summarized below are the key findings for individual genes and gene clusters. ApoA-II. 1- The -911/+29 promoter is sufficient to direct expression of a reporter gene exclusively in the liver and thus represents a liver-specific promoter. 2- Important factors for the activity of this promoter are hormone nuclear receptors and the ubiquitous factor USF. 3. SREBP-1 and SREBP-2 bind to five and four sites respectively and transactivate the apoA-II promoter. Their role in the in vivo transcription of the apoA-II gene has not been established. ApoB. 1. Regulatory sequence extending 5 Kb upstream and 1.5 Kb downstream of the apoB promoter are sufficient to direct hepatic expression of the apoB gene. The intestinal expression of the apoB gene requires in addition a 315 bp intestinal enhancer located 56 Kb upstream of the apoB gene. 2. Important factors for apoB gene transcription appear to be C/EBP, HNF-3, HNF-4 and other nuclear receptors which bind both on the proximal promoter and the intestinal enhancer. ApoE/ApoCI/ApoCIV/ApoCII Cluster. 1. The expression of the genes of the apoE/apoCI/apoCII/apoE cluster are controlled by two homologous hepatic control regions designated HCR-1 and HCR-2 of approximately 600 bp located 15 and 27 Kb 3? of the apoE gene. Either region is sufficient to direct gene expression in vivo, although HCR-1 appears to have a dominant effect on apoE and apoCI and HCR-2 has a dominant effect on apoCIV and apoCII gene expression. 2. Two other homologous regulatory regions designated ME-1 and ME-2 located 3.3 and 15.9 Kb downstream of the apoE gene can direct independently the expression of the apoE gene in macrophages and adipocytes. 3. Important factors for apoE gene regulation appear to be SP1 on the proximal promoter, and possibly HNF-3, C/EBP and hormone nuclear receptors on the enhancers. 4. Important factors for apoCII gene transcription appear to be HNF-4 and RXR-alpha/T3R-beta which binds to a thyroid response element of the proximal promoter. ApoA-I/ApoCIII/ApoA-IV Gene Cluster. 1. The transcription of the apoA-I/apoCIII/apoA-IV gene cluster is controlled by a common enhancer located 590 to 790 nucleotides upstream of the apoCIII gene. 2. Important factors for the activity of the enhancer are SP1, HNF-4 and possibly other nuclear receptors. Important factors for the activity of the proximal promoters are HNF-4, and possibly other nuclear receptors. 3. The HNF-4 binding site of the apoCIII enhancer is required for the intestinal expression of apoA-I and apoCIII gene and enhances synergistically the hepatic transcription of the two genes and possibly of apoA-IV in vivo. The three SP1 sites of the enhancer are also required for the intestinal expression of apoA-I and apoCIII genes in vivo and for the enhancement of the hepatic transcription. 4. Pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-alpha and IL-1 repress, and TGF-beta stimulates the apoCIII promoter activity. The TGF-beta pathway activates SMAD3/4 proteins which interact with HNF-4 bound to the apoCIII promoter and enhancer and increase its activity. 5. It appears that other factors activated by different signaling pathways (NF-kappa-B, Jun and others) interact with HNF-4 bound to the enhancer and thus repress the activity of apoCIII promoter. Understanding the transcriptional regulatory mechanism of the apolipoprotein genes may allow, in the long run, selective increase of anti-atherogenic lipoproteins and thus reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease.