David Whitmore

Prof. Dr. David Whitmore

Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 October 2015 in Genome Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WDWayne I.L. Davies
Wayne I.L. Davies
TTT. Katherine Tamai
T. Katherine Tamai
LZLei Zheng
Lei Zheng
JFJosephine K. Fu
Josephine K. Fu
JRJason Rihel
Jason Rihel
MHMark W Hankins
Mark W Hankins
Light affects animal physiology and behavior more than simply through classical visual, image-forming pathways. Nonvisual photoreception regulates numerous biological systems, including circadian entrainment, DNA repair, metabolism, and behavior. However, for the majority of these processes, the photoreceptive molecules involved are unknown. Given the diversity of photophysiological responses, the question arises whether a single photopigment or a greater diversity of proteins within the opsin superfamily detect photic stimuli. Here, a functional genomics approach identified the full complement of photopigments in a highly light-sensitive model vertebrate, the zebrafish (Danio rerio), and characterized their tissue distribution, expression levels, and biochemical properties. The results presented here reveal the presence of 42 distinct genes encoding 10 classical visual photopigments and 32 nonvisual opsins, including 10 novel opsin genes comprising four new pigment classes. Consistent with the presence of light-entrainable circadian oscillators in zebrafish, all adult tissues examined expressed two or more opsins, including several novel opsins. Spectral and electrophysiological analyses of the new opsins demonstrate that they form functional photopigments, each with unique chromophore-binding and wavelength specificities. This study has revealed a remarkable number and diversity of photopigments in zebrafish, the largest number so far discovered for any vertebrate. Found in amphibians, reptiles, birds, and all three mammalian clades, most of these genes are not restricted to teleosts. Therefore, nonvisual light detection is far more complex than initially appreciated, which has significant biological implications in understanding photoreception in vertebrates.

11 September 2007 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TTT. Katherine Tamai
T. Katherine Tamai
LYLucy C. Young
Lucy C. Young
DWDavid Whitmore
David Whitmore
Zebrafish tissues and cells have the unusual feature of not only containing a circadian clock, but also being directly light-responsive. Several zebrafish genes are induced by light, but little is known about their role in clock resetting or the mechanism by which this might occur. Here we show that Cryptochrome 1a ( Cry1a ) plays a key role in light entrainment of the zebrafish clock. Intensity and phase response curves reveal a strong correlation between light induction of Cry1a and clock resetting. Overexpression studies show that Cry1a acts as a potent repressor of clock function and mimics the effect of constant light to “stop” the circadian oscillator. Yeast two-hybrid analysis demonstrates that the Cry1a protein interacts directly with specific regions of core clock components, CLOCK and BMAL, blocking their ability to fully dimerize and transactivate downstream targets, providing a likely mechanism for clock resetting. A comparison of entrainment of zebrafish cells to complete versus skeleton photoperiods reveals that clock phase is identical under these two conditions. However, the amplitude of the core clock oscillation is much higher on a complete photoperiod, as are the levels of light-induced Cry1a . We believe that Cry1a acts on the core clock machinery in both a continuous and discrete fashion, leading not only to entrainment, but also to the establishment of a high-amplitude rhythm and even stopping of the clock under long photoperiods.

22 January 2014 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HMHelen A Moore
Helen A Moore
DWDavid Whitmore
David Whitmore
Traditionally, circadian clocks have been thought of as a neurobiological phenomenon. This view changed somewhat over recent years with the discovery of peripheral tissue circadian oscillators. In mammals, however, the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) in the hypothalamus still retains the critical role of a central synchronizer of biological timing. Zebrafish, in contrast, have always reflected a more highly decentralized level of clock organization, as individual cells and tissues contain directly light responsive circadian pacemakers. As a consequence, clock function in the zebrafish brain has remained largely unexplored, and the precise organization of rhythmic and light-sensitive neurons within the brain is unknown. To address this issue, we used the period3 (per3)-luciferase transgenic zebrafish to confirm that multiple brain regions contain endogenous circadian oscillators that are directly light responsive. In addition, in situ hybridization revealed localised neural expression of several rhythmic and light responsive clock genes, including per3, cryptochrome1a (cry1a) and per2. Adult brain nuclei showing significant clock gene expression include the teleost equivalent of the SCN, as well as numerous hypothalamic nuclei, the periventricular grey zone (PGZ) of the optic tectum, and granular cells of the rhombencephalon. To further investigate the light sensitive properties of neurons, expression of c-fos, a marker for neuronal activity, was examined. c-fos mRNA was upregulated in response to changing light conditions in different nuclei within the zebrafish brain. Furthermore, under constant dark (DD) conditions, c-fos shows a significant circadian oscillation. Taken together, these results show that there are numerous areas of the zebrafish central nervous system, which contain deep brain photoreceptors and directly light-entrainable circadian pacemakers. However, there are also multiple brain nuclei, which possess neither, demonstrating a degree of pacemaker complexity that was not previously appreciated.

18 September 2008 in The EMBO Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MDMarcus Ps Dekens
Marcus Ps Dekens
DWDavid Whitmore
David Whitmore
On the first day of development a circadian clock becomes functional in the zebrafish embryo. How this oscillator is set in motion remains unclear. We demonstrate that zygotic period1 transcription begins independent of light exposure. Pooled embryos maintained in darkness and under constant temperature show elevated non‐oscillating levels of period1 expression. Consequently, there is no maternal effect or developmental event that sets the phase of the circadian clock. Analysis of period1 transcription, at the cellular level in the absence of environmental stimuli, reveals oscillations in cells that are asynchronous within the embryo. Demonstrating an autonomous onset to rhythmic period1 expression. Transcription of clock1 and bmal1 is rhythmic in the adult, but constant during development in light‐entrained embryos. Transient expression of dominant‐negative ΔCLOCK blocks period1 transcription, thus showing that endogenous CLOCK is essential for the transcriptional regulation of period1 in the embryo. We demonstrate a default mechanism in the embryo that initiates the autonomous onset of the circadian clock. This embryonic clock is differentially regulated from that in the adult, the transition coinciding with the appearance of several clock output processes.

19 March 2019 in Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ISInga A. Frøland Steindal
Inga A. Frøland Steindal
DWDavid Whitmore
David Whitmore
Zebrafish represent the one alternative vertebrate, genetic model system to mice that can be easily manipulated in a laboratory setting. With the teleost Medaka (Oryzias latipes), which now has a significant following, and over 30,000 other fish species worldwide, there is great potential to study the biology of environmental adaptation using teleosts. Zebrafish are primarily used for research on developmental biology, for obvious reasons. However, fish in general have also contributed to our understanding of circadian clock biology in the broadest sense. In this review, we will discuss selected areas where this contribution seems most unique. This will include a discussion of the issue of central versus peripheral clocks, in which zebrafish played an early role; the global nature of light sensitivity; and the critical role played by light in regulating cell biology. In addition, we also discuss the importance of the clock in controlling the timing of fundamental aspects of cell biology, such as the temporal control of the cell cycle. Many of these findings are applicable to the majority of vertebrate species. However, some reflect the unique manner in which “fish” can solve biological problems, in an evolutionary context. Genome duplication events simply mean that many fish species have more gene copies to “throw at a problem”, and evolution seems to have taken advantage of this “gene abundance”. How this relates to their poor cousins, the mammals, remains to be seen.

8 April 2013 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RLRicardo Laranjeiro
Ricardo Laranjeiro
TTT. Katherine Tamai
T. Katherine Tamai
EPElodie Peyric
Elodie Peyric
PKPeter Krusche
Peter Krusche
SOSascha Ott
Sascha Ott
DWDavid Whitmore
David Whitmore
Specific stages of the cell cycle are often restricted to particular times of day because of regulation by the circadian clock. In zebrafish, both mitosis (M phase) and DNA synthesis (S phase) are clock-controlled in cell lines and during embryo development. Despite the ubiquitousness of this phenomenon, relatively little is known about the underlying mechanism linking the clock to the cell cycle. In this study, we describe an evolutionarily conserved cell-cycle regulator, cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1d (20 kDa protein, p20), which along with p21, is a strongly rhythmic gene and directly clock-controlled. Both p20 and p21 regulate the G1/S transition of the cell cycle. However, their expression patterns differ, with p20 predominant in developing brain and peak expression occurring 6 h earlier than p21 . p20 expression is also p53-independent in contrast to p21 regulation. Such differences provide a unique mechanism whereby S phase is set to different times of day in a tissue-specific manner, depending on the balance of these two inhibitors.