Purpose National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Study BR.21 established erlotinib as a standard of care in patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after failure of first- or second-line chemotherapy. The current study analyzes the influence of age on outcomes in BR.21. Patients and Methods BR.21 was a double-blind phase III trial that randomly assigned 731 patients to erlotinib 150 mg daily or placebo. End points included progression-free survival and overall survival (OS), response, quality of life (QOL), drug exposure, and toxicity, which are analyzed in this retrospective study by the following two age groups: ≥ 70 years (elderly) or less than 70 years (young). Results There were 163 elderly patients (112 on erlotinib, 51 on placebo) and 568 young patients (376 on erlotinib, 192 on placebo). There was no significant difference between age groups randomly assigned to erlotinib or placebo in progression-free survival (elderly: 3.0 v 2.1 months; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.63; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.90; P = .009; young: 2.1 v 1.8 months; HR = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.76; P < .0001; interaction, P = .77) or OS (elderly: 7.6 v 5.0 months; HR = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.64 to 1.34; P = .67; young: 6.4 v 4.7 months; HR = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.89; P = .0014; interaction, P = .31). Response rates were similar between age groups. Elderly patients, compared with young patients, had significantly more overall and severe (grade 3 and 4) toxicity (35% v 18%; P < .001), were more likely to discontinue treatment as a result of treatment-related toxicity (12% v 3%; P < .0001), and had lower relative dose-intensity (64% v 82% received > 90% planned dose; P < .001). Conclusion Elderly patients treated with erlotinib gain similar survival and QOL benefits as younger patients but experience greater toxicity.

Background: Some non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) surgical series have indicated that the positive prognostic effect of female sex is limited to patients with adenocarcinoma. We carried out a retrospective analysis to investigate the role of sex and histology on efficacy, toxicity, and dose delivery after chemotherapy.

Bone metastases (BM) are common in NSCLC patients. Despite some potential positive effects of bone-targeted therapies, their use in NSCLC is infrequent, which may relate to the overall poor prognosis of advanced lung cancer. We reviewed the literature to evaluate the incidence, consequences and use of bone-targeting agents in lung cancer patients with BM in both the trial and non-trial clinical setting. Published prospective and retrospective papers investigating lung cancer and BM, in trial and non-trial settings, were identified and are discussed in this review. BM are common in patients with advanced lung cancer and often present symptomatically with pain and skeletal related events (SREs). Patients with high bone turnover marker levels, multiple BM, and history of pathological fractures have shorter overall survival. In randomized studies bone-targeted therapies reduced the risk of SREs and prolonged the time to first SRE. The use of bone-targeted agents may also be associated with a survival benefit. BM are a common problem in advanced lung cancer. While the benefits of bone-targeted therapies have been demonstrated, their use is limited in non-trial populations. If better predictive markers of individual risk were available this might increase the appropriate use of bone-targeted agents.

Purpose: In malignant mesothelioma (MM), radiologic assessment of disease status is difficult. Both soluble mesothelin-related peptide (SMRP) and osteopontin (OP) have utility in distinguishing MM from benign pleural disease. We evaluated whether SMRP and OP also correlated with the disease course of MM. Patients and Methods: Serial plasma samples from patients with MM were prospectively collected, and SMRP and OP levels were measured. Radiologic tests across time periods showing disease progression, stability, or shrinkage were compared with corresponding changes in SMRP/OP levels. Results: From 41 patients, 165 samples were collected (range, 2 to 10; median 4). At study entry, 37 of 41 patients had measurable disease, of whom 92% (34 of 37) had elevated baseline SMRP levels; four of 41 patients had no evidence of recurrence and each had normal baseline SMRP levels. In 21 patients receiving systemic therapy, percentage change in SMRP more than 10% correlated with the radiologic assessment by a trained thoracic radiologist (P < .001), by formal Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST; P = .008), or by modified RECIST (P < .001). All seven patients who underwent surgical resection with negative margins had elevated preoperative SMRP levels that fell to normal postoperatively. Rising SMRP was observed in all patients with radiologic disease progression. No associations were found with OP. Conclusion: Percentage changes in SMRP levels, but not changes in OP levels, are a potentially useful marker of disease course. These findings should be validated prospectively for a role as an objective adjunctive measure of disease course in both clinical trials and clinical practice.